IS NIGERIA A NORMAL COUNTRY, A ZOO, OR A JUNGLE?, BY SESUGH AKUME

download 2024 09 23T002511.032 1 jpeg

IS NIGERIA A NORMAL COUNTRY, A ZOO, OR A JUNGLE?, BY SESUGH AKUME

When last year, the Benue governor, Fr Hyacinth Alia, violated the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria 1999, by sacking democratically-elected local government officials and dissolving their executive and legislative councils, in a bid to appoint illegal, unlawful, unconditional caretaker stooges, I went to court with simple, straightforward questions, and made specific prayers. In the matter of Sesugh Akume v Governor of Benue and 4 Others (MHC/346/2023), I asked the court to do its singular most important duty, and both uphold the Constitution and prevent itsabuse.

After numerous unnecessary delays, the case just stopped. Thejudge hearing the case, Justice P T Kwahar, eventually left the Benue judiciary. For the matter to be assigned since then to another judge to hear it has become another issue altogether. Thiscase has entered voicemail because the governor is involved. The signalling is that a governor is above the law, and can do and get away with anything.

In March 2023, the military attacked my community in Sankera(Benue). I reported it to the National Human Rights Commission(NHRC), whose job is to investigate the matter, make a determination, and get the offended justice. My prayers are very clear. The evidence is irrefutable. They refused to do it because the military is involved, and in fact, the officer handling it told me so. The signalling is that if you’re the military or of the military, you can do anything and get away with it.

I took the commission, the chair of its governing council, and executive secretary to court for refusing to do their job, and exposing me to all sorts in the process, in the matter of Sesugh Akume v National Human Rights Commission and 2 Others (FHC/ABJ/CS/1135/2024). The court gave the date to begin the case. They were duly served all court processes, but on the day of the hearing they didn’t show up, filed nothing, and the judge himself refused to hear the case and returned it for reassignment, possibly to another court. If you’re a government agency, you can do anything and get away with it, is the image this casts, and the government agencies get it.

There are many other instances but I’ll stay with these few, just for illustration purposes. Many others have worse stories to tell, and it’s no news.

The dictionary defines ‘the law of the jungle’ to mean ‘might is right’. The bigger, stronger, more powerful gets away with anything and dominates all others. It’s survival of the fittest. Humans too once lived like this until they agreed that we are not beasts and should have rules to regulate our societies and relationships with one another, therefore, the ‘rule of law’ which makes everybody subject to the law, no matter who they are, and none is above it. This, in contrast to beasts of the jungle, where the mightiest is the law themself, and can do and undo.

A zoo may be composed of animals of all kinds, some even wild, but is well regulated. Each animal species is in their own habitat and taken care of. On no occasion can another animal trample onanother or invade another’s space. It simply doesn’t happen. Even the strongest animals can’t just do anything they want. That is for a zoo, and these are animals in a regulated environment, not beasts in the wild.

Each one is to objectively take their pick and determine whether Nigeria is a normal society, a zoo, or a jungle. I don’t like lying to myself and have since taken mine. Take yours. On this issue of Nigeria, this, in my opinion, is where to begin. From a point of truth, and it’s okay for each of us to have our own truths.

Sesugh Akume, a public policy analyst, writes from Abuja.

  • Dons Eze

    DONS EZE, PhD, Political Philosopher and Journalist of over four decades standing, worked in several newspaper houses across the country, and rose to the positions of Editor and General Manager. A UNESCO Fellow in Journalism, Dr. Dons Eze, a prolific writer and author of many books, attended several courses on Journalism and Communication in both Nigeria and overseas, including a Postgraduate Course on Journalism at Warsaw, Poland; Strategic Communication and Practical Communication Approach at RIPA International, London, the United Kingdom, among others.

    Related Posts

    FUBARA LOSES AS APPEAL COURT AFFIRMS PRO-WIKE LAWMAKER AS AUTHENTIC SPEAKER OF RIVERS ASSEMBLY

    FUBARA LOSES AS APPEAL COURT AFFIRMS PRO-WIKE LAWMAKER AS AUTHENTIC SPEAKER OF RIVERS ASSEMBLY The Court of Appeal sitting in Abuja, on Thursday, affirmed Hon. Martin Amaewhule as the authentic Speaker of the Rivers State Assembly. The appellate court, in a unanimous decision by a three-member panel of Justices, equally validated the Amaewhule-led members of the Assembly as bonafide lawmakers for the state. While dismissing an appeal that was lodged before it by Governor Siminalaye Fubara, the court upheld a judgement the Federal High Court delivered on January 22, which nullified the 2024 budget of Rivers State on the premise that it was not presented before members of the state assembly that were known to the law. According to the appellate court, Fubara, shot himself on the foot when he voluntarily withdrew a counter-affidavit he filed to challenge a legal action the Amaewhule-led lawmakers instituted to be recognised as valid members of the Rivers State House of Assembly. The court held that governor Fubara’s decision to present the 2024 Rivers State Appropriation Bill to only four out of 31 members of the Assembly, amounted to a gross violation of section 91 of the 1999 Constitution, as amended. It will be recalled that the Rivers State Assembly was fractionalised owing to the frosty relationship between Governor Fubara and his predecessor and Minister of the Federal Capital Territory, FCT, Nyesom Wike. In the heat of the fracas, governor Fubara sidelined the Amaewhule-led 26 members of the House that were loyal to Wike and presented the state’s N800billion 2024 budget before the four lawmakers led by Hon. Edison Ehie who had emerged as a factional Speaker of the Assembly. The Ehie-led faction, which had also declared seats of the Amaewhule-led pro-Wike lawmakers vacant for defecting to the All Progressives Congress, APC, from the Peoples Democratic Party, promptly passed the budget which was quickly assented to by Governor Fubara. Meanwhile, following the intervention of President Bola Tinubu, both Fubara and Wike signed a peace pact that included the restoration of Amaewhule as the bonafide Speaker of the State Assembly. The factional Speaker, Ehie, who had approached the court and was joined as an interested party in the suit, subsequently withdrew all the processes he filed before the court and equally rescinded both his seat and his membership of the Assembly. Whereas Governor Fubara, in line with terms of the peace deal, withdrew all the processes he filed to challenge the suit, however, the pro-Wike lawmakers only withdrew an impeachment notice they served on him while they declined to terminate their legal action. While deciding the suit, Justice James Omotosho of the high court held that the budget was invalid as it was not properly presented before the Rivers State House of Assembly as required by the law. It held that Governor Fubara acted like a tyrant when he demolished the Rivers State Assembly complex and withheld funds standing to the credit of the legislative house. The court also described as unconstitutional, the redeployment of the Clerk and Deputy Clerk of the Rivers State Assembly by Governor Fubara. Justice Omotosho stressed that the governor lacked the statutory rights to interfere with the operations of the Assembly, adding that he acted in contempt of a subsisting order that barred the parties from taking any steps to overreach the matter that was pending before the court. Besides, the court held that the National Assembly could not take over the legislative affairs of the state in the absence of the preconditions that were listed under section 11 of the 1999 Constitution, as amended. Consequently, the court, among other things, nullified all actions the Rivers Assembly took without the participation of the Amaewhule-led members of the House, among which included the presentation…

    HOUSE OF REPS BEGINS MOVE TO PROBE BUHARI GOVT

    HOUSE OF REPS BEGINS MOVE TO PROBE BUHARI GOVT The House of Representatives has unveiled plans to launch a comprehensive investigation into the Road Infrastructure Development and Refurbishment Investment Tax Credit scheme, which was initiated by former President Muhammadu Buhari in 2019. The decision follows the adoption of a motion of Urgent Public Importance brought forward by Hon. Ibrahim Aliyu during the plenary session on Wednesday. The scheme, established through Executive Order No. 007, was designed to address Nigeria’s significant infrastructure deficit by encouraging private sector participation in road development. Under the program, private companies that invest in the construction or refurbishment of eligible roads can recover their costs through tax credits against future Companies Income Tax (CIT) liabilities. However, Hon. Aliyu raised concerns about the effectiveness and accountability of the scheme, arguing that, five years after its launch, has yet to deliver clear results. In his lead debate, Hon. Aliyu emphasized the importance of ensuring public funds are used responsibly and questioned whether the scheme has truly contributed to bridging Nigeria’s infrastructure gap. He noted that the Federal Government had previously stated that Nigeria would need approximately N348 trillion over a decade to close the nation’s infrastructure deficit. Despite this massive need, the results of the Tax Credit Scheme remain uncertain. “The House observes that this Tax Credit Scheme was meant to encourage private sector participation in road infrastructure development in Nigeria. It allows companies to recover costs incurred in constructing or refurbishing eligible roads as tax credits against their future Companies Income Tax liability,” Aliyu said. Aliyu also pointed out that after five years, the scheme’s viability, efficiency, and overall cost-effectiveness of the projects completed under its umbrella have not been sufficiently evaluated. The House resolution seeks to investigate the projects completed so far, as well as the mechanisms for ensuring accountability and transparency in how the scheme has been implemented. The Tax Credit Scheme has been lauded for its innovative approach to solving Nigeria’s infrastructure problem by leveraging private sector resources. Major corporations, including Dangote Group, have participated in the program, with some high-profile road projects being undertaken under the scheme. However, critics argue that while the scheme offers short-term relief for some road projects, it may not address the long-term structural issues of underfunding and mismanagement in Nigeria’s infrastructure sector. Some stakeholders have also raised concerns that certain projects may not have been cost-effective or that the benefits of the scheme could be disproportionately favouring large corporations at the expense of smaller businesses. The House of Representatives has resolved to set up a committee to conduct a thorough investigation into the scheme. The inquiry will focus on evaluating the overall impact of the program on Nigeria’s road infrastructure, the transparency of the project selection process, and whether the projects completed under the scheme have provided value for money. “The House further observes that 5 years after its inception, the scheme’s effectiveness, which hinges on the viability and cost efficiency of projects undertaken, is yet to be ascertained,” Aliyu stressed during the debate.

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

    You Missed

    2024 RIVERS BUDGET A NULLITY – APPEAL COURT

    FUBARA LOSES AS APPEAL COURT AFFIRMS PRO-WIKE LAWMAKER AS AUTHENTIC SPEAKER OF RIVERS ASSEMBLY

    • By Dons Eze
    • October 10, 2024
    • 103 views

    I SACRIFICED MY POLITICAL CAREER IN FINLAND FOR BIAFRA’S INDEPENDENCE – SIMON EKPA

    NNAMDI KANU’S WIFE BEGS UK GOVT TO INTERVENE IN IPOB LEADER’S CASE

    FUEL PRICE HIKE: TINUBU LISTENED TO DANGOTE – IPMAN CHAIR

    ROYAL FATHERS TO FG: WE WANT DIRECT PAYMENT OF OUR 5% ALLOCATION