ENUGU GOVT VOWS TO GO TOUGH AGAINST SEX-FOR-GRADE OFFENDERS
The Enugu State government has reaffirmed its commitment to eliminate sex-for-grade menace in its tertiary institutions, warning that any offender, regardless of their position, will face severe consequences.
Speaking during a one-day meeting involving knowledge management stakeholders and leaders from tertiary education institutions, Secretary to the State Government, Prof. Chidiebere Onyia, said the state government had focused on the “state-level adoption of the model anti-sexual harassment policy convened by the state Ministry of Education.
Prof. Onyia stated that Governor Peter Mbah was resolute on this issue and intends to make an example of multiple offenders.
“His Excellency is very determined about this, and when the Hon. Commissioner informed me that we’ve progressed to policy development, I was thrilled,” he stated.
“We are prepared to hold individuals accountable in this state. Academics found guilty of harassing students or soliciting sexual favours for grades will be swiftly prosecuted. I assure you that, once the information is processed, those individuals will face immediate legal action.”
Prof. Onyia also mentioned that the state intends to engage the Independent Corrupt Practices Commission (ICPC) as a partner in this initiative, reinforcing the government’s zero tolerance for such misconduct. He noted that several sting operations have already been conducted at various institutions.
“This policy establishes the framework for our vision as a state, and I urge everyone to collaborate in this endeavor, as the Enugu State government, under His Excellency, is firmly committed.
“This policy will extend to secondary schools as well, and we will engage closely with female students. Our sting operations will capture offenders regardless of their age.”
He expressed disappointment at the absence of some Vice Chancellors at such an important meeting, stressing the necessity for their attendance in future discussions since this issue demands serious attention.
In his remarks, the state Commissioner for Education, Prof. Ndubueze Mbah, provided an overview of the policy’s formulation, noting that the “policy document is the result of extensive collaborative research, assessment, peer review, and feedback.”
Prof. Mbah explained that they are working alongside the Gender Mobile Initiative and the ICPC to implement the National Anti-sexual Harassment Policy in Tertiary Institutions. This meeting marks the second step following the gathering in Abuja in June 2024.
“This initiative is part of our commitment to creating safe campuses. We aim to foster an inclusive and respectable academic environment where students and professionals can learn without fear of threats or harassment.
“This is part of His Excellency, Barr. Peter Mbah’s mandate for ethical leadership in Enugu State, and the Gender Mobile partners have expressed satisfaction with the turnout at today’s meeting.”
He further disclosed that the Anti-sexual Harassment Policy encompasses all educational levels—basic schools, senior secondary, and tertiary institutions—but implementation will begin with tertiary education and then expand to the basic education system.
Explaining how this policy will be rolled out to the institutions, Dr. Ernest Ogezi, the Learning Measurement and Evaluation Manager at the Gender Mobile Initiative, said, “Enugu is setting the standard by developing a state-level anti-sexual harassment policy, which is commendable.”
He added that the policy will be tailored to each institution, emphasizing that “we’ll collaborate with every school to understand their unique context and integrate it into their anti-sexual harassment policy, as no two institutions share the same circumstances.”
“We begin by signing a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) with the institution. Through this MoU, we will launch the Campus Safety Initiative (CSI), which is built on four pillars.
“Next, we will establish a Technical Working Group (TWG) that will be trained by the ICPC. The state has already introduced us to various institutions, including private ones.
“We will also appoint campus ambassadors and conduct town hall meetings with students and faculty.”
He further explained that the Model Anti-Sexual Harassment Policy, adopted by the Federal Ministry of Education, was developed by the ICPC in collaboration with the Gender Mobile Initiative.
“This policy aims to promote gender equality by addressing and eradicating sexual and gender-based violence and tackling intersectional gender inequality within society through a lens of prevention.
In an interview with journalists, Kennedy Ebuhotemen, the Resident Anti-Corruption Commissioner for ICPC in Enugu and Ebonyi states, emphasized that the commission is taking decisive action to combat the alarming trend of sexual harassment, insisting there will be no sacred cows.
He also reaffirmed their commitment to partnering with the Enugu State government to “cleanse our educational institutions of sexual harassment, raise awareness, and develop comprehensive policies to guide victims on how to respond when faced with harassment.”
He added, “The ICPC will not tolerate anyone who misuses their position to gain undue advantages or facilitate activities that harm society. We are committed to prosecuting offenders within the bounds of the law.”
“We start by signing an MoU with the institution. Through this MoU, we will introduce the Campus Safety Initiative (CSI) to the school which has four Pillers.
“We’re going to set up the Technical Working Group (TWG) which will be trained by the ICPC and the state has already introduced us to the institutions in the state including the private ones.
“We’re going to set-up campus Ambassadors and have town hall meetings with students and lecturers.”
He added that the Model Anti-sexual Harassment Policy which has been adopted by the federal ministry of education was developed by the ICPC in collaboration with Gender Mobile Initiative and they seek to enhance gender equality and “we do this by ensuring that sexual and gender based violence is removed and we’re working on eradicating intersectional gender inequality in the society and we do this through the lense of sexual and gender based violence prevention.”
Speaking with journalists, the Resident Anti-Corruption Commissioner, ICPC, Enugu and Ebonyi states, Kennedy Ebuhotemen said the commission is taking the bull by the horn in arresting the ugly trend of sexual harassment, adding that there will be no sacred cow.
He also disclosed their commitment to partnering with Enugu State government to “sanitize the educational institutions to ensure that the issue of sexual harassment becomes a thing of the past, sensitise the educational institutions and also design a comprehensive policy on this and keep them informed on what to do when they’re harassed.
He added that; “ICPC will not condone anyone who uses his position to confer undue advantage and facilitate vices that are inimical to the well-being of the society. We’re doing everything within the law to prosecute offenders.”
WHY THE NORTH OPPOSES TOTAL RESTRUCTURING OF NIGERIA
WHY THE MORTH OPPOSES TOTAL RESTRUCTURING OF NIGERIARecently, the Arewa Consultative Forum (ACF) issued a communiqué after its high-level meeting that highlighted national interest issues and focused on the incessant insecurity in the north and the entire Nigeria. ACF Board of Trustees Chairman, Alhaji Bashir Muhammad Dalhatu, went the extra mile to apologize to the northerners for the “collective failure of leaders”. Beyond that, ACF partly blamed the Federal Government for not doing enough and called for scaling up the community-driven defence models used in the North-East. This simple nation-building engagement by ACF was seized by the Nigerian Tribune Editorial and pivoted to something else. The editorial questioned the legitimacy of the meeting due to “the absence of attendance of leaders from the minority states in the North” and wondered why “throughout President Muhammadu Buhari’s eight years in office, a period that marked the deterioration of insecurity in the region, the ACF never issued this kind of statement”. Then the editorial offers the ultimate panacea to all Nigeria’s problems by insisting that the northern leaders should “embrace total restructuring of Nigeria”. The editorial is replete with misinformation and half-truths. Today, I will leave these matters for another opportunity and focus on the restructuring.Restructuring is natural in any organic entity such as Nigeria. However, there are optimum approaches to minimize costs towards desired benefits. Calls for restructuring Nigeria have been persistent, driven by dissatisfaction with the country’s political, economic, and social structures. Advocates for restructuring often argue that Nigeria’s current system is inefficient, unequal, and prone to ethnic tensions. The Nigerian Tribune editorial associated the “insecurity in Northern Nigeria” with “the fact that in the absence of restructuring, governments will only be presiding over mass bloodletting”. While there are merits to the restructuring debate, the idea of completely overhauling the nation’s structure comes with significant risks. As a history student, I would like to share lessons from other countries that have restructured. We can find cautionary tales that highlight the complexities and unintended consequences of such moves.Countries that undergo total restructuring often face challenges in maintaining national unity. A key argument for restructuring in Nigeria is the decentralization of power from the federal to state or local governments. While decentralization may allow more autonomy for regions, it can also deepen existing ethnic and religious divides. Nigeria is home to over 250 ethnic groups, and further restructuring could inflame separatist tendencies, as has happened in other countries. For instance, in Yugoslavia, the push for more autonomy and the eventual restructuring of the federation contributed to its violent disintegration in the 1990s. It broke up, at first into five countries. The ethnic and nationalist tensions that arose from the restructuring process led to civil wars, mass atrocities, and the eventual breakup of the country into smaller, ethnically defined states. Nigeria, with its own history of a civil war, must be cautious of any move that could reignite separatist movements or further fragment the country. The editorial seems to divisively highlight the issue of minority states in the North. It ignores the fact that every one of the six regions in Nigeria has minorities and each has its mistrust toward the dominant groups.One of the promises of restructuring is that it would allow regions or states to control their resources, enabling them to manage their development more effectively. However, this could also worsen economic disparities between regions. The north is generally less economically developed than the oil-rich southern regions or the Lagos State as the commercial hub of the region. A total restructuring that gives regions or states full control over their resources might lead to increased wealth for the south while leaving the north behind. The potential tension is obvious. This is similar to what happened…