EDO 2024: THE THREE HORSE RACE: HOW THE CANDIDATES STAND

download 2024 09 21T065319.973 jpeg

EDO 2024: THE THREE HORSE RACE: HOW THE CANDIDATES STAND
Eligible voters in Edo State will go to the polls on Saturday, September 21, to elect a new governor that will take over from the incumbent, Godwin Obaseki, who will complete his statutory eight-year tenure by November 12, 2024.
Campaigns for the coveted seat have been intense. Candidates from 17 political parties are in the contest. THISDAY examines the candidates and the factors that may swing victory in their favour, as well as their strengths and weaknesses in the fierce contest.
The political atmosphere in Edo State is reaching a feverish pitch. The frenzy is on, typical of elections in Nigeria, as electioneering has always been characterised by the usual carpet-crossing, alignments and realignments; horse-trading and violence. No doubt, the election is a three-horse race, but this particular contest is peculiar in several ways.
The rivalry between PDP, the governing party in Edo State, and APC, the party in charge at the national level, is more of a status and influence contest between two former allies, Governor Godwin Obaseki, and his predecessor, Comrade Adams Oshiomhole, now a senator.
Before the duo parted ways, they were political bedfellows, such that against all protestations, Oshiomhole, as the outgoing governor in 2016, ensured that Obaseki, who then was a political neophyte, became the governor of the state on the platform of APC. But soon after the inauguration of Obaseki, the honeymoon between him and his then benefactor, Oshiomhole, was over. Both men became political enemies and never agreed again politically.
Saturday’s election will rekindle the rivalry between the duo, which began in 2019, when 14 elected state lawmakers loyal to Oshiomhole, were prevented from being sworn in as members of the House of Assembly, a situation orchestrated by Obaseki. To get back at Obaseki, Oshiomhole, then as National Chairman of APC, had denied Obaseki APC’s second term governorship ticket, an issue that would later cost him his own job.
Oshiomhole is looking to reassert his influence in the state. But Obaseki is determined not to yield an inch. And with both men backing the opposing front runners, the stakes couldn’t be higher. And, of course, the candidate of Labour Party, Olumide Akpata, is poised to take advantage of the numerical strength of the zone he hails from.
The three leading candidates are Asue Ighodalo of the governing Peoples Democratic Party (PDP), Olumide Akpata of Labour Party (LP), and Monday Okpebholo of All Progressives Congress (APC). Since the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) declared campaigns open for the off-cycle election some months ago, the stakes have increased daily, with political tension in full swing.
There have been threats to security at different times, but the campaigns have also degenerated to character debate, with two of the frontline candidates – Ighodalo and Okpebholo – staying away from a debate organised for the candidates. Things got to a head last week, when PDP and its candidate, Ighodalo, declined to sign the peace accord, an electoral ritual, on the allegation that the police, an institution meant to provide security, was biased and working for APC.
APC, also, initially refused to sign the agreement because an orderly to its candidate was killed during the campaigns and his killers had yet to be apprehended. But it eventually signed the peace pact. These scenarios have significantly coloured the tenor of campaigns, preparatory to the election this weekend. And they have further exposed the strengths and weaknesses of each of the candidates, inadvertently hinting at how they may stand in the election.
Asue Ighodalo
Quite a few factors are going well for the PDP candidate, Asue Ighodalo. These include his pedigree and sound education. A lawyer, economist, and head of various blue-chip companies, with eloquence and the ability to sell his manifesto, “Pathway to Prosperity For All”, Ighodalo stands out from the rest.
Since politics is a game of number and with the current state of the nation, the PDP governors are determined to maintain their current number, even it. Ighodalo has the overwhelming support of governors of his party.
Again, a majority of Edo people in the Diaspora have thrown their weight behind Ighodalo. The National Association of Nigerian Students (NANS), too, as well as traders and other professionals have followed suit.
Additionally, his native Esan people have resolved to stand by their own. To them, the Okpebholo axis of Edo Central district had taken the senate position and, therefore, cannot take the governorship, in addition. They hold the view that the Ighodalo axis should take the governorship for balance of power.
Another factor in favour of Ighodalo is the choice of his running mate, Osarodion Ogie, who appears to command staggering followership across the three senatorial districts of the state and have friends across the parties.
Unfortunately, two issues stand stoutly against his aspiration. One is the much-touted federal might, which though has been dismissed repeatedly, but may be relied on by the opposition party. The other factor is the political disposition of his leader and benefactor, Godwin Obaseki, which many consider undesirable.
Ighodalo’s association with Obaseki may constitute a minus for him. It is why some people have likened his candidacy to a continuation of Obaseki’s administration. For these people, stopping Ighodalo is akin to stopping Obaseki, irrespective of the development that the Obaseki administration has brought to the state and the bold vision articulated by Ighodalo in his manifesto.
Olumide Akpata;
Also a lawyer and former president of Nigerian Bar Association (NBA), Olumide Akpata is well-read and a good choice by his party. He, too, parades a robust manifesto, titled, “My Pact With Edo People.” Coming from a zone that has the highest number of registered voters, up to 58 per cent, more than the other two districts put together, Akpata may ride on the popularity of his party and its performance in the 2023 general election, which enabled it to snatch a senatorial seat from PDP and APC.
But Akpata’s number one disadvantage may be the consensus reached by a majority of the Edo elite to yield power to the central zone, which has not tasted the governorship since the Fourth Republic, except for Professor Oserhiemen Osunbor, who governed for 18 months before the courts nullified his mandate in favour of Adams Oshiomhole in 2008.
Unlike PDP and APC, which have known political figures as running mates, the LP deputy governorship candidate, Alhaji Yusuf Asamah Kadiri, SAN, is largely unknown in the political artery of Edo State. It is doubtful if he can muscle votes for the LP ticket.
Kadiri suffers the same plague as Akpata. Both are outsiders in the politics of Edo, and are largely seen as trying to take votes away from PDP, which, unfortunately, may help APC.
Monday Okpebholo
Though the APC candidate, Monday Okpebholo, is not a political neophyte, and he can leverage some political experience, especially as a senator, he also has the backing of the ruling party at the centre, with its federal might.
Okpebholo equally has to his advantage some very good campaign managers, who do the talking for him and have boasted about how they would explore federal might to his advantage.
Despite those advantages, Okpebholo appears to lack depth and the gravitas to run a state in this day and age. Both his age and the age of his ideas appear to be out of tune with reality. Talk about articulation, eloquence, grasp and knowledge of issues, he is in a different realm – a total write-off, many have argued.
It is no wonder that he has been dodging debates – either in the print or electronic media. That he is from the same senatorial district as the PDP candidate is another disadvantage, because he may likely split votes with Ighodalo.
In the final analysis, while the three political parties will try to put up a good fight and seek to outdo one another, the odds are believed to still presently favour the PDP candidate, Ighodalo, even though nothing is certain yet in politics until the final whistle is blown.

  • Dons Eze

    DONS EZE, PhD, Political Philosopher and Journalist of over four decades standing, worked in several newspaper houses across the country, and rose to the positions of Editor and General Manager. A UNESCO Fellow in Journalism, Dr. Dons Eze, a prolific writer and author of many books, attended several courses on Journalism and Communication in both Nigeria and overseas, including a Postgraduate Course on Journalism at Warsaw, Poland; Strategic Communication and Practical Communication Approach at RIPA International, London, the United Kingdom, among others.

    Related Posts

    FUBARA LOSES AS APPEAL COURT AFFIRMS PRO-WIKE LAWMAKER AS AUTHENTIC SPEAKER OF RIVERS ASSEMBLY

    FUBARA LOSES AS APPEAL COURT AFFIRMS PRO-WIKE LAWMAKER AS AUTHENTIC SPEAKER OF RIVERS ASSEMBLY The Court of Appeal sitting in Abuja, on Thursday, affirmed Hon. Martin Amaewhule as the authentic Speaker of the Rivers State Assembly. The appellate court, in a unanimous decision by a three-member panel of Justices, equally validated the Amaewhule-led members of the Assembly as bonafide lawmakers for the state. While dismissing an appeal that was lodged before it by Governor Siminalaye Fubara, the court upheld a judgement the Federal High Court delivered on January 22, which nullified the 2024 budget of Rivers State on the premise that it was not presented before members of the state assembly that were known to the law. According to the appellate court, Fubara, shot himself on the foot when he voluntarily withdrew a counter-affidavit he filed to challenge a legal action the Amaewhule-led lawmakers instituted to be recognised as valid members of the Rivers State House of Assembly. The court held that governor Fubara’s decision to present the 2024 Rivers State Appropriation Bill to only four out of 31 members of the Assembly, amounted to a gross violation of section 91 of the 1999 Constitution, as amended. It will be recalled that the Rivers State Assembly was fractionalised owing to the frosty relationship between Governor Fubara and his predecessor and Minister of the Federal Capital Territory, FCT, Nyesom Wike. In the heat of the fracas, governor Fubara sidelined the Amaewhule-led 26 members of the House that were loyal to Wike and presented the state’s N800billion 2024 budget before the four lawmakers led by Hon. Edison Ehie who had emerged as a factional Speaker of the Assembly. The Ehie-led faction, which had also declared seats of the Amaewhule-led pro-Wike lawmakers vacant for defecting to the All Progressives Congress, APC, from the Peoples Democratic Party, promptly passed the budget which was quickly assented to by Governor Fubara. Meanwhile, following the intervention of President Bola Tinubu, both Fubara and Wike signed a peace pact that included the restoration of Amaewhule as the bonafide Speaker of the State Assembly. The factional Speaker, Ehie, who had approached the court and was joined as an interested party in the suit, subsequently withdrew all the processes he filed before the court and equally rescinded both his seat and his membership of the Assembly. Whereas Governor Fubara, in line with terms of the peace deal, withdrew all the processes he filed to challenge the suit, however, the pro-Wike lawmakers only withdrew an impeachment notice they served on him while they declined to terminate their legal action. While deciding the suit, Justice James Omotosho of the high court held that the budget was invalid as it was not properly presented before the Rivers State House of Assembly as required by the law. It held that Governor Fubara acted like a tyrant when he demolished the Rivers State Assembly complex and withheld funds standing to the credit of the legislative house. The court also described as unconstitutional, the redeployment of the Clerk and Deputy Clerk of the Rivers State Assembly by Governor Fubara. Justice Omotosho stressed that the governor lacked the statutory rights to interfere with the operations of the Assembly, adding that he acted in contempt of a subsisting order that barred the parties from taking any steps to overreach the matter that was pending before the court. Besides, the court held that the National Assembly could not take over the legislative affairs of the state in the absence of the preconditions that were listed under section 11 of the 1999 Constitution, as amended. Consequently, the court, among other things, nullified all actions the Rivers Assembly took without the participation of the Amaewhule-led members of the House, among which included the presentation…

    HOUSE OF REPS BEGINS MOVE TO PROBE BUHARI GOVT

    HOUSE OF REPS BEGINS MOVE TO PROBE BUHARI GOVT The House of Representatives has unveiled plans to launch a comprehensive investigation into the Road Infrastructure Development and Refurbishment Investment Tax Credit scheme, which was initiated by former President Muhammadu Buhari in 2019. The decision follows the adoption of a motion of Urgent Public Importance brought forward by Hon. Ibrahim Aliyu during the plenary session on Wednesday. The scheme, established through Executive Order No. 007, was designed to address Nigeria’s significant infrastructure deficit by encouraging private sector participation in road development. Under the program, private companies that invest in the construction or refurbishment of eligible roads can recover their costs through tax credits against future Companies Income Tax (CIT) liabilities. However, Hon. Aliyu raised concerns about the effectiveness and accountability of the scheme, arguing that, five years after its launch, has yet to deliver clear results. In his lead debate, Hon. Aliyu emphasized the importance of ensuring public funds are used responsibly and questioned whether the scheme has truly contributed to bridging Nigeria’s infrastructure gap. He noted that the Federal Government had previously stated that Nigeria would need approximately N348 trillion over a decade to close the nation’s infrastructure deficit. Despite this massive need, the results of the Tax Credit Scheme remain uncertain. “The House observes that this Tax Credit Scheme was meant to encourage private sector participation in road infrastructure development in Nigeria. It allows companies to recover costs incurred in constructing or refurbishing eligible roads as tax credits against their future Companies Income Tax liability,” Aliyu said. Aliyu also pointed out that after five years, the scheme’s viability, efficiency, and overall cost-effectiveness of the projects completed under its umbrella have not been sufficiently evaluated. The House resolution seeks to investigate the projects completed so far, as well as the mechanisms for ensuring accountability and transparency in how the scheme has been implemented. The Tax Credit Scheme has been lauded for its innovative approach to solving Nigeria’s infrastructure problem by leveraging private sector resources. Major corporations, including Dangote Group, have participated in the program, with some high-profile road projects being undertaken under the scheme. However, critics argue that while the scheme offers short-term relief for some road projects, it may not address the long-term structural issues of underfunding and mismanagement in Nigeria’s infrastructure sector. Some stakeholders have also raised concerns that certain projects may not have been cost-effective or that the benefits of the scheme could be disproportionately favouring large corporations at the expense of smaller businesses. The House of Representatives has resolved to set up a committee to conduct a thorough investigation into the scheme. The inquiry will focus on evaluating the overall impact of the program on Nigeria’s road infrastructure, the transparency of the project selection process, and whether the projects completed under the scheme have provided value for money. “The House further observes that 5 years after its inception, the scheme’s effectiveness, which hinges on the viability and cost efficiency of projects undertaken, is yet to be ascertained,” Aliyu stressed during the debate.

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

    You Missed

    2024 RIVERS BUDGET A NULLITY – APPEAL COURT

    FUBARA LOSES AS APPEAL COURT AFFIRMS PRO-WIKE LAWMAKER AS AUTHENTIC SPEAKER OF RIVERS ASSEMBLY

    • By Dons Eze
    • October 10, 2024
    • 103 views

    I SACRIFICED MY POLITICAL CAREER IN FINLAND FOR BIAFRA’S INDEPENDENCE – SIMON EKPA

    NNAMDI KANU’S WIFE BEGS UK GOVT TO INTERVENE IN IPOB LEADER’S CASE

    FUEL PRICE HIKE: TINUBU LISTENED TO DANGOTE – IPMAN CHAIR

    ROYAL FATHERS TO FG: WE WANT DIRECT PAYMENT OF OUR 5% ALLOCATION