HOW ENDBADGOVERNANCE PROTEST COST DSS, NIA BOSSES THEIR JOBS
The reasons the immediate past Director-General of the Department of State Services, Yusuf Bichi, and the DG of the National Intelligence Agency, Ahmed Abubakar, resigned from their positions have been revealed.
Sources within the Presidency told Saturday PUNCH that President Bola Tinubu and the National Security Adviser, Nuhu Ribadu, questioned the intelligence gathering mechanisms of the two agencies following the violent nature of the #EndBadGovernance protests in some northern states and the seizure of three presidential aircraft in France.
While Bichi was held responsible for lack of functional intelligence on the protest, Abubakar was reportedly queried for the NIA’s inability to have reports ahead of the seizure of the jets by a Chinese company, Zhongshan Fucheng Industrial Investment Co. Limited.
A French court had sanctioned the seizure of three Nigerian presidential jets, including a newly purchased Airbus, amid a legal dispute between Zhongshan and the Ogun State Government.
The #EndBadGovernance protest, which began on August 1, turned violent in Kano, Gombe, Yobe, Borno and Bauchi states while demonstrations in the South-West were peaceful.
During the protests in some northern states, public and private facilities were destroyed, while hoodlums looted shops and caused mayhem. This led to the imposition of curfews in Kano, Bauchi, and Plateau states.
The protest was driven by widespread hardship resulting from the removal of fuel subsidy, electricity tariff hike and the high cost of living, among other issues.
Bichi, who hails from Kano State, where widespread destruction and looting occurred, was appointed on September 14, 2018, by former President Muhammadu Buhari.
Abubakar, from Katsina State, was also appointed by Buhari on January 10, 2018.
According to credible sources, Tinubu and Ribadu were embarrassed by the turn of events on the seizure of the presidential jets and the #EndBadGovernance demonstrations.
“The seizure of the presidential jets and violent nature of the #EndBadGovernance protest embarrassed the President nationally and internationally.
“The President was displeased with the NIA and DSS bosses. This was why he requested the resignation of the two security chiefs,” said one of the sources.
Another source claimed that Bichi and Ribadu had been having a running battle before the protest, with the fallout from the northern demonstrations serving as the final straw.
He stated, “The former DSS DG and the NSA boss had been on bad terms for some time. Their issues escalated to the point that Bichi was unable to meet the President for a while. The Presidency finally had a valid reason to dismiss him due to the #EndBadGovernance protest.”
Abubakar announced his resignation on Saturday, August 24, after meeting with President Tinubu. In contrast, Bichi’s resignation was announced in a statement by the President’s Special Adviser on Media and Publicity, Ajuri Ngelale, on Monday, August 26
Some DSS officers, who spoke on condition of anonymity, described his exit as ‘freedom from unprofessionalism’.
The DSS officers listed Bichi’s alleged misconduct to include undue interference in the service’s operations by his wife and son, Yusuf Bichi.
A video of some DSS staff members allegedly celebrating Bichi’s resignation surfaced online immediately after his departure.
However, an X user, Sanusi Jibrin, said the clip was recorded at the Kogi State DSS office, where personnel were celebrating Ajayi’s appointment, as he was a former director at the state command. A DSS officer, however, said personnel of the agency were happy with his removal.
“We believed his regime was a punishment for us. He impeded the career advancement of many officers by extending the service years of those due to retire. Some senior officers, who were due for retirement in 2021 and 2022 were retained in the service,” he stated.
Another officer alleged that Bichi was indifferent to the welfare of workers. “The Federal Government increased our salary by 40 per cent, but there was no implementation. We were earning more than the police before, but the police are now earning more than us because they implemented their 40 per cent increment. However, there was a proposal to increase our salary by 25 per cent this year, but it has yet to be realised,” the officer said.
Speaking on the recruitment of personnel, another secret agent described Bichi’s recruitment as nepotistic. “Bichi’s recruitments were arbitrary and lopsided. Three different training sessions have been conducted for some people we didn’t know when they were recruited this year alone. Most of the newly recruited personnel are northerners.
“His first recruitment in 2019 brought in either 420 or 450 persons from Bichi Local Government Area in Kano alone. In the history of the service, 450 was the maximum recruitment we ever had before Bichi, but he recruited 1,000 personnel at once.
“There was no southerner among the national directors and deputy directors at the headquarters until January this year when he was directed by the Presidency following a petition. His wife is another issue; she abused her husband’s office. His son, too, was power drunk.
“Just two weeks ago, his wife slapped a DSS director in a northern state. She also slapped at least two deputy directors at airports.”
Tweeps also criticised the former DSS boss, accusing him of allowing his family to abuse power because of his position.
The publisher of Daily Nigerian, Jafaar Jafaar, while commenting on X, said Bichi turned the DSS into a “graveyard of career aspirations.”
“He lowered the recruitment bar, removed the multi-layer screening process to recruit personnel who couldn’t even pass the Halogen Security aptitude test. Bichi arguably recruited the highest number of Cotonou ‘graduates’ into the service. He wilfully extended the tenure of some retired directors in his good book for years, killing the ambitions of the aspiring directors. He allowed his wife to lord over the service, influencing recruitment, promotion and discipline,” he stated.
L ABOUR PARTY AND CHALLENGE OF DEMOCRACY
LABOUR PARTY AND CHALLENGE OF DEMOCRACYDemocracy is based on popular participation of the people in their government. Internal democracy is a constitutional requirement which ensures the participation of the members of a political party in the affairs of their political party. This right is granted them by giving them the exclusive privilege to elect the members of their Party’s ruling organs. Section 223(1)(a)(2)(a) of the 1999 Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria (CFRN) as amended, provides for the periodical election, on a democratic basis, not exceeding four years, of the principal officers and members of the executive committee or other governing body of a political party. The democratic basis in section 82(3) of the Electoral Act (EA) means that the election of members of the governing body of a political party, including the election to fill a vacant position in any of the governing bodies, shall be conducted in a democratic manner which allows all members of the party or their duly elected delegates to vote in support of a candidate of their choice. Any other route apart from this route to impose leadership on any party is illegal and a destruction of internal democracy and as such null and void.The Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) is empowered by law to ensure that political parties observe the practices of internal democracy, including the fair and transparent conduct of party congresses and conventions. The law did this in section 82(1) and (5) of the EA when it instructed any political party that wants to elect its National Officers to give the Commission at least 21 days’ notice of any convention, congress, conference or meeting convened for the purpose of electing members of its governing bodies. Failure to do this renders the convention invalid. The whole idea of giving INEC 21 days notice is to enable INEC to monitor that the parties comply with the provisions of the law and ensure fairness and transparency in the election of their officers.It then means that any party that fails to invite INEC, through the requisite 21 days notice, intends not to observe internal democracy in organising its elections and also intends not to be fair and transparent in its elections. INEC will be failing in its duties to lend its name to such a desecration of the laws by the party and would have been a willing tool in the destruction of our democracy. The proper thing INEC should do is to ignore such a charade and treat it as having not been done. We have become so lawless and so litigious that we think the courts must give orders before we perform our duties. No! Courts are meant to settle disputes, not to do the work for people. INEC doesn’t need a court order to ignore any national executive of a political party which emerged in a manner not known to law because in the eyes of the law, there was no convention. Paragraph 15(b)(c) of third schedule to the CFRN empowers INEC to register political parties and monitor the organisation and operation of the political parties. Any party that fails to comply with the laws should be penalised by INEC by refusing to recognise the officers that are responsible for the breaching of the laws.What is happening in Labour Party (LP) today is a reflection of lawlessness and impunity that have characterised our fourth republic and this is threatening to destroy our democracy. It is important to note that other parties are suffering from one problem or the other and if this trend is not checked and corrected, Nigerians will lose interest completely in the democratic process. By the communique released recently by the expired, former Abure-led National Working Committee (NWC) of the LP,…