STAKEHOLDERS CALL FOR SCRAPPING OF HIGHER NATIONAL DIPLOMA

download 74 2 jpeg

STAKEHOLDERS CALL FOR SCRAPPING OF HIGHER NATIONAL DIPLOMA

Stakeholders in the education sector have called for the scrapping of the Higher National Diploma (HND) certificate. They said this was the best way to resolve and address the lingering Higher National Diploma (HND) and Bachelor of Science (Bsc) dichotomy certification in the country.

Professor Idris Bugaje, the Executive Secretary of the National Board for Technical Education (NBTE), Professor Tunji Olaopa, the Chairman, Federal Civil Service Commission, ASUP President, Shammah Kpanja, Comrade Ridwan Opeyemi Munirudeen, the National President, National Association of Polytechnic Students (NAPS) and Rectors of Polytechnic Institutions across the country were among the stakeholders who canvassed the position at a ‘One-day national dialogue on the future of Higher National Diploma (HND) programme in the Nigerian Educational Landscape’, organised by the National Board for Technical Education (NBTE) in Abuja on Tuesday.

At the event, the stakeholders brainstormed on issues surrounding the continued discrimination of the holders of the HND certificates and fashioned out ways of addressing the agelong problem.

Speaking during the event, Prof.Tunji Olaopa, the Chairman, Federal Civil Service Commission, called for the scrapping of HND awarded by polytechnics.

He said if the lingering professional war between B.Sc./B.Tech. and HND degrees holders must be resolved without totally rendering dysfunctional their originating mandates and purposes, then the recommendation of the Heads of Polytechnics and Colleges of Technology (COHEADS) in their 2007 memorandum to the then Presidential Technical Committee on the Consolidation of Tertiary Institutions must be revisited.

According to him, COHEADS recommended the conversion and upgrading of polytechnics into campuses of their proximate universities, while the largest polytechnics in each of the geo-political zones should be converted into full-fledged universities of technology.

“In so doing – and this for me is the game-changer – HND should be scrapped, while the National Diploma (ND) should be retained as a qualifying certificate for entrance into the new and old universities of technology and schools of technology affiliates of existing universities”, Olaopa said.

But he added that “the design should create two streams of B.Sc. (Technology) and B.Tech., with B.Tech. designed to focus on inculcating technical skills and competences across the middle to the very high levels of jobs and careers, a model which the First Technical University, Ibadan (on which Governing Council I was one of the pioneer members) is attempting to pioneer.

“Consequently, the curricula cum pedagogical remodelling of the OND-B.Tech. certification will entail training for demand-driven end users’ skills, while the faculty will draw significantly from scholars-practitioners/professors of practice corps practical oriented lecturers, those with strong strength in theory and research.

“Within this arrangement, the National Diploma (ND) will be expanded to fill in the space for technical and vocational training programmes, which contents should also embed the City and Guild old certification and learning contents in manner that are mutually reinforcing. This would however require aggressive staff development and facilities upgrade and increased funding to make sense.”

According to Olaopa, the new ND-B.Tech. certification stream will benefit greatly from the German dual vocational training model “if benchmarked with action research adaptation to accommodate Nigeria’s peculiarities. The German dual-mode system integrates theory and practice, thinking and doing, systematic and work/factory-based practical classes. Here the costs (when fully institutionalised and functional) of the dual vocational training can be borne proportionately by government and the business community.”

Earlier, Olaopa disclosed that he was ever so glad to contribute to education sector reform conversation as a past Head of Policy Division and Coordinator, Education Sector Strategy Team in the Federal Ministry of Education in 1999-2002.

He disclosed that in 2018, the FGN announced the abolition of the B.Sc./HND dichotomy, while a 2021 bill of the NASS attempted to legislate the policy pronouncement.

But according to him, the policy pronouncement and series of other policy measures taken to concretize the measure are not very helpful for all practical purpose, nor are the assumptions behind them rigorous enough to be in a position to achieve their objective now and in future.

“If they were, significant progress would have been made to resolve the old lingering professional war that seems not to be abating. Whereas I find it easy to champion a two-step NCE-B.Ed. certification model for resolving the same crisis in which colleges of education are enmeshed, pushing for similar remodelling in favour of polytechnics as dual-mode HND-B.Tech. certification, will sure create more problems and complexities than solution,” he said.

According to him, the orientation of the polytechnics and universities are dissimilar, though it could be made to be mutually reinforcing if creatively remodelled.

“While the polytechnics are by design, oriented to train students to acquire job-specific skills, practical knowledge, and industry-relevant competences as hands-on education required to operate in real world-of-work contexts, the universities’ education and learning emphases are to build research-rooted in-depth and cutting-edge knowledge, one that is designed to enable students develop critical thinking and analytical skills.

“University students are therefore trained to acquire expanded intellectual horizons so they can contribute to advancing knowledge in their fields, through the application of scientific theories and principles that enable innovative solutions to complex societal problems.”

But he warned that to attempt a mesh of polytechnic and university education through their convergence for grading, skills pricing and career pathing as is being pushed, at policy levels, will amount to attempting to distort and confuse the quality and purpose of both educational paths.

On his part, the Prof. Bugaje, the NBTE boss, declared that the decision will put an end to the lingering discrimination against HND holders in the country’s public service.

He said: “Well, today we have held this stakeholders engagement. The Minister of State for Education, the Chairman of Civil Service Commission, Unions, Rectors, and other stakeholders, are all here. We have agreed with overall to discontinue with HND. Nigerian polytechnics will continue to offer National Diploma, but after National Diploma, students would be admitted to read Bachelor of Technology (Honours), in their field. It will be a degree that will be different from that surprised by the Nigerian Universities Commission NUC, ours will be a skills-based degree.The regulation will be done by NBTE and the professional bodies, and this will be final answer to the dichotomy, discrimination, and unnecessary, unwarranted discrimination against the HND holders in the Nigerian public service”.

Earlier, Hon. Yusuf Tanko Sununu, the Minister of State for Education, urged stakeholders at the dialogue to critically consider the pros and cons inherent in the scraping of HND, and submit their communique to the ministry, assuring the outcome of the meeting would be pursued vigorously to ensure its actualization.He said: “Our stand is that they should look at it critically, assessing the pros and cons and then, the guiding principle is that where the benefit outweighs the risk of what they want to do the ministry will support them to do it.”

  • Dons Eze

    DONS EZE, PhD, Political Philosopher and Journalist of over four decades standing, worked in several newspaper houses across the country, and rose to the positions of Editor and General Manager. A UNESCO Fellow in Journalism, Dr. Dons Eze, a prolific writer and author of many books, attended several courses on Journalism and Communication in both Nigeria and overseas, including a Postgraduate Course on Journalism at Warsaw, Poland; Strategic Communication and Practical Communication Approach at RIPA International, London, the United Kingdom, among others.

    Related Posts

    36 STATE ASSEMBLIES ADOPT, RATIFY HARMONIZED STANDING ORDERS

    36 STATE ASSEMBLIES ADOPT, RATIFY HARMONIZED STANDING ORDERS To tackle discrepancies in suspension, impeachment of members and other legislative procedures, the 36 states’ Houses of Assembly have adopted and ratified the use of harmonised standing orders. The rules to be adopted at each of the 36 Houses of Assembly aim to ensure unity across the states in implementing disciplinary issues of suspension and impeachment, removal of presiding officers and other members, the conduct of budgetary processes, and confirmation of appointments forwarded by the executive arm of government. The harmonised orders also deal with the conduct of the election of presiding officers, adoption of legislative reports, statutory reports, and resolutions, ratifying constitutional alterations and treaties, the establishment of special, ad hoc committees, and the conduct of executive sessions. The harmonised standing orders were adopted and ratified when the Conference of Speakers of State Legislatures of Nigeria converged on Lagos, on Thursday, for a workshop organised by the Konrad Adenauer Stiftung in collaboration with the National Institute for Legislative and Democratic Studies. In his remarks, the Chairman of the Conference of Speakers, Adebo Ogundoyin, noted that by adopting the harmonised standing orders, Nigeria was joining other countries like the United States of America, South Africa and Rwanda which had harmonised legislative frameworks. Ogundoyin, who is the Speaker of the Oyo State House of Assembly, noted that the harmonised standing orders for states would ensure that state legislatures have standardised rules, which would give their actions and ensure accountable governance. Ogundoyin expressed optimism that the various Houses of Assembly would adopt the uniform rules for use in their states, within the next three months. “This monumental step forward, which began in 2021 is not just a procedural reform; it is a strategic step towards strengthening the efficiency, transparency, and uniformity of legislative operations across all states Houses of Assembly. By standardising our legislative rules, we are enhancing collaboration, improving legislative oversight, and ultimately ensuring a more responsive and accountable governance framework at the sub-national level. “We are happy to draw inspiration from our partners, the German Government and the United States of America, whose 50 states operate a centralised standing order. “On the African continent, South Africa and Rwanda stand tall in this regard, and Nigeria is set to join the list of countries with harmonised legislative frameworks, further solidifying our commitment to democratic governance and institutional strengthening,” Ogundoyin said. Setting the tone for the event, Resident Representative, Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung Nigeria, Marija Peran, said harmonising the assemblies’ rules aimed to create a standardised approach that fosters collaboration, reduces procedural discrepancies and enhances the overall effectiveness of the legislative bodies. Pointing to the imbroglio in the Lagos and Rivers states Houses of Assembly, Peran noted that the harmonisation of standing orders would ensure consistency, transparency and efficiency in the legislative processes. With the harmonised standing orders, she said state Houses of Assembly were on the path of a more cohesive legislative environment. “We are only two and a half months into 2025 and some states’ Houses of Assembly have already been shaken up massively. This shows us that we cannot take either stability or democratic processes for granted. “As we further embark on this journey, it is essential to reflect on the significance of uniform standing orders within the states’ Houses of Assembly. These orders serve as the backbone of legislative procedures, ensuring consistency, transparency and efficiency in the legislative processes. “The objectives of harmonising these orders are clear: to create a standardised approach that fosters collaboration, reduces procedural discrepancies and enhances the overall effectiveness of the legislative bodies,” she said. The Director-General, National Institute for Legislative and Democratic Studies, Prof Abubakar Sulaiman, noted the vulnerability of legislatures as a result of executive interference. He stressed that the…

    36 STATE ASSEMBLIES ADOPT, RATIFY HARMONIZED STANDING ORDERS

    36 STATE ASSEMBLIES ADOPT, RATIFY HARMONIZED STANDING ORDERS To tackle discrepancies in suspension, impeachment of members and other legislative procedures, the 36 states’ Houses of Assembly have adopted and ratified the use of harmonised standing orders. The rules to be adopted at each of the 36 Houses of Assembly aim to ensure unity across the states in implementing disciplinary issues of suspension and impeachment, removal of presiding officers and other members, the conduct of budgetary processes, and confirmation of appointments forwarded by the executive arm of government. The harmonised orders also deal with the conduct of the election of presiding officers, adoption of legislative reports, statutory reports, and resolutions, ratifying constitutional alterations and treaties, the establishment of special, ad hoc committees, and the conduct of executive sessions. The harmonised standing orders were adopted and ratified when the Conference of Speakers of State Legislatures of Nigeria converged on Lagos, on Thursday, for a workshop organised by the Konrad Adenauer Stiftung in collaboration with the National Institute for Legislative and Democratic Studies. In his remarks, the Chairman of the Conference of Speakers, Adebo Ogundoyin, noted that by adopting the harmonised standing orders, Nigeria was joining other countries like the United States of America, South Africa and Rwanda which had harmonised legislative frameworks. Ogundoyin, who is the Speaker of the Oyo State House of Assembly, noted that the harmonised standing orders for states would ensure that state legislatures have standardised rules, which would give their actions and ensure accountable governance. Ogundoyin expressed optimism that the various Houses of Assembly would adopt the uniform rules for use in their states, within the next three months. “This monumental step forward, which began in 2021 is not just a procedural reform; it is a strategic step towards strengthening the efficiency, transparency, and uniformity of legislative operations across all states Houses of Assembly. By standardising our legislative rules, we are enhancing collaboration, improving legislative oversight, and ultimately ensuring a more responsive and accountable governance framework at the sub-national level. “We are happy to draw inspiration from our partners, the German Government and the United States of America, whose 50 states operate a centralised standing order. “On the African continent, South Africa and Rwanda stand tall in this regard, and Nigeria is set to join the list of countries with harmonised legislative frameworks, further solidifying our commitment to democratic governance and institutional strengthening,” Ogundoyin said. Setting the tone for the event, Resident Representative, Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung Nigeria, Marija Peran, said harmonising the assemblies’ rules aimed to create a standardised approach that fosters collaboration, reduces procedural discrepancies and enhances the overall effectiveness of the legislative bodies. Pointing to the imbroglio in the Lagos and Rivers states Houses of Assembly, Peran noted that the harmonisation of standing orders would ensure consistency, transparency and efficiency in the legislative processes. With the harmonised standing orders, she said state Houses of Assembly were on the path of a more cohesive legislative environment. “We are only two and a half months into 2025 and some states’ Houses of Assembly have already been shaken up massively. This shows us that we cannot take either stability or democratic processes for granted. “As we further embark on this journey, it is essential to reflect on the significance of uniform standing orders within the states’ Houses of Assembly. These orders serve as the backbone of legislative procedures, ensuring consistency, transparency and efficiency in the legislative processes. “The objectives of harmonising these orders are clear: to create a standardised approach that fosters collaboration, reduces procedural discrepancies and enhances the overall effectiveness of the legislative bodies,” she said. The Director-General, National Institute for Legislative and Democratic Studies, Prof Abubakar Sulaiman, noted the vulnerability of legislatures as a result of executive interference. He stressed that the…

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

    You Missed

    36 STATE ASSEMBLIES ADOPT, RATIFY HARMONIZED STANDING ORDERS

    36 STATE ASSEMBLIES ADOPT, RATIFY HARMONIZED STANDING ORDERS

    COURT RESTRAINS INEC FROM RECEIVING PETITION FOR RECALL OF NATASHA

    I APOLOGIZE FOR MY MISCONDUCT IN COURT – NNAMDI KANU

    WIKE WINS AGAIN AT SUPREME COURT AS ALLY, SAMUEL ANYANWU, RECLAIM PDP NATIONAL SECRETARY SEAT

    BREAKING: PDP NATIONAL SECRETARY: ANYANWU WINS AT SUPREME COURT