CALL FOR SACK OF POWER MINISTER, ADELABU, HIGHTENS AFTER RECENT CONTRADICTIONS

download 87

CALL FOR SACK OF POWER MINISTER, ADELABU, HIGHTENS AFTER RECENT CONTRADICTIONS

Minister of Power, Adebayo Adelabu’s recent contradictions on the transfer of electricity regulatory oversight to the state has added to his collection of flops.

The development has further heightened calls for President Bola Ahmed Tinubu to sack Adelabu ahead of his one-year anniversary in office on May 29, 2024.

Recall that Adelabu announced last Friday at the 8th Edition of Africa Energy Market Place in Abuja the suspension of the state government’s electricity regulatory oversight.

The announcement represents an open fight against the 2023 Electricity Act.

Adelabu spoke at the two-day stakeholders’ workshop organized by the Nigerian Electricity Regulatory Commission, NERC, in Lagos.

Explaining his latest stance, Adelabu said the federal government would not go against the 2023 Electricity Act.

“The grant of regulatory autonomy to states is a provision of the new Act, and no one person can single-handedly go against the Act.

“It’s a provision of the law and no law-abiding officer of the state will want to go against the law. It is already included, and it must be duly respected,” he said.

In April, the NERC transferred oversight of the electricity market to Enugu, Ekiti, and Ondo states.

The development kicked off the decentralization of Nigeria’s power sector.

Under the plan, states control the entire generation, transmission and distribution sector value chain.

But this is the first time the Nigerian Electricity Supply Industry is witnessing structural change.

The privatization of 2013 espoused similar hope. However, over ten years later, the hope has been dashed. The Minister’s flip-flop comments may have worsened the situation.

Meanwhile, Adelabu’s policy-induced comment may not have helped Nigeria’s power sector challenges.

His infamous April comment blaming the country’s power woes on Nigerians switching on their freezers compounded citizenry anger amid a 240-hour electricity price hike period.

However, he apologized to Nigerians for his comment that Nigerians misuse electricity because it is cheap.

Similarly, during his appearance at a Senate Committee on Power, the Minister further compounded the problem by threatening Nigerians with darkness if the electricity hike was not implemented.

The threat offended the sensibility of Nigerians grappling with an epileptic power supply.

In the year alone, the country has had at least three blackouts. On February 4, March 28 and April 15

Nigeria’s power generation has stagnated from 3000 megawatts to 5000 since pre-privatization.

The development led Nigerians and stakeholders to call for the Minister’s sack.

Meanwhile, in a telephone interview, Bolaji Tunji, Adelabu’s Special Adviser on Strategic Communications and Media Relations, said the minister had performed optimally in the last year.

According to him, Nigeria’s electricity supply has improved under the stewardship of the Minister.

He refuted claims that stakeholders wanted the Minister sacked.

“I haven’t heard stakeholders speak badly about the Minister’s performance.

“The country’s power sector has improved recently from 4,000 megawatts to 5000mw. And we are still going further. There will be light at the end of the tunnel,” he said.

Lack of policy consistencies tormenting Tinubu’s administration- Prof Iledare

In an exclusive interview with DAILY POST, Wumi Iledare, Professor Emeritus and Executive Director of Emmanuel Egbogah Foundation said the country’s power sector, like all sectors, was suffering from chaos and a lack of policy consistency.

He noted that policy irregularities could not translate to informed decisions that would lead to sustainable national development.

“As I have said in many forums recently, that understanding is deeper than knowledge.

“Many decision makers driving the governance of the energy sector- oil, gas, and power in Nigeria, though, may know the sector, perhaps their understanding of its complexity is very delimited.

“Thus, one can understand recent chaos and lack of policy consistency.

“Over the years, some of us have advocated for decentralizing governance and regulatory institutions of the power sector, which the Electricity Act 2023 recently did. PIA 2021 offers similar opportunities, calling for the deregulation of the downstream petroleum sector.

“Unfortunately, this administration prefers Executive Orders to the Provisions of an Act!

“The truism in these irregularities is not to expect transactionally informed decisions to translate to sustainable national development. Only transformational ideas and policies can do that,” he told DAILY POST.

The Lead Director of the Centre for Social Justice, Eze Onyekpere, has urged President Bola Ahmed Tinubu to punish Adelabu for his abysmal performance.

He noted that the Minister is the worst performing.

“The truth is that the Minister is the worst performing in terms of all measures. Can you stop a law that was made by the National Assembly and signed by the president?

“He is evidently confused. I am expecting President Bola Tinubu to sack him by May 29. If he doesn’t, it shows he is not serious,” he declared.

Ewetumo A A, a retired staff member of the defunct Power Holding Company of Nigeria, PHCN, formerly the National Electric Power Authority, NEPA, aligned with Onyekpere’s call for Adelabu’s sack.

“The Minister’s unqualified comical errors have clearly portrayed him as utterly unfit for the job and office of overseeing the nation’s power sector.

“He lacks the capacity, period.

“He should be reassigned or let go”, he said.Recall that Tinubu’s predecessor, Muhammadu Buhari, had sacked Maman Saleh as Power Minister in September 2021.

  • Dons Eze

    DONS EZE, PhD, Political Philosopher and Journalist of over four decades standing, worked in several newspaper houses across the country, and rose to the positions of Editor and General Manager. A UNESCO Fellow in Journalism, Dr. Dons Eze, a prolific writer and author of many books, attended several courses on Journalism and Communication in both Nigeria and overseas, including a Postgraduate Course on Journalism at Warsaw, Poland; Strategic Communication and Practical Communication Approach at RIPA International, London, the United Kingdom, among others.

    Related Posts

    36 STATE ASSEMBLIES ADOPT, RATIFY HARMONIZED STANDING ORDERS

    36 STATE ASSEMBLIES ADOPT, RATIFY HARMONIZED STANDING ORDERS To tackle discrepancies in suspension, impeachment of members and other legislative procedures, the 36 states’ Houses of Assembly have adopted and ratified the use of harmonised standing orders. The rules to be adopted at each of the 36 Houses of Assembly aim to ensure unity across the states in implementing disciplinary issues of suspension and impeachment, removal of presiding officers and other members, the conduct of budgetary processes, and confirmation of appointments forwarded by the executive arm of government. The harmonised orders also deal with the conduct of the election of presiding officers, adoption of legislative reports, statutory reports, and resolutions, ratifying constitutional alterations and treaties, the establishment of special, ad hoc committees, and the conduct of executive sessions. The harmonised standing orders were adopted and ratified when the Conference of Speakers of State Legislatures of Nigeria converged on Lagos, on Thursday, for a workshop organised by the Konrad Adenauer Stiftung in collaboration with the National Institute for Legislative and Democratic Studies. In his remarks, the Chairman of the Conference of Speakers, Adebo Ogundoyin, noted that by adopting the harmonised standing orders, Nigeria was joining other countries like the United States of America, South Africa and Rwanda which had harmonised legislative frameworks. Ogundoyin, who is the Speaker of the Oyo State House of Assembly, noted that the harmonised standing orders for states would ensure that state legislatures have standardised rules, which would give their actions and ensure accountable governance. Ogundoyin expressed optimism that the various Houses of Assembly would adopt the uniform rules for use in their states, within the next three months. “This monumental step forward, which began in 2021 is not just a procedural reform; it is a strategic step towards strengthening the efficiency, transparency, and uniformity of legislative operations across all states Houses of Assembly. By standardising our legislative rules, we are enhancing collaboration, improving legislative oversight, and ultimately ensuring a more responsive and accountable governance framework at the sub-national level. “We are happy to draw inspiration from our partners, the German Government and the United States of America, whose 50 states operate a centralised standing order. “On the African continent, South Africa and Rwanda stand tall in this regard, and Nigeria is set to join the list of countries with harmonised legislative frameworks, further solidifying our commitment to democratic governance and institutional strengthening,” Ogundoyin said. Setting the tone for the event, Resident Representative, Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung Nigeria, Marija Peran, said harmonising the assemblies’ rules aimed to create a standardised approach that fosters collaboration, reduces procedural discrepancies and enhances the overall effectiveness of the legislative bodies. Pointing to the imbroglio in the Lagos and Rivers states Houses of Assembly, Peran noted that the harmonisation of standing orders would ensure consistency, transparency and efficiency in the legislative processes. With the harmonised standing orders, she said state Houses of Assembly were on the path of a more cohesive legislative environment. “We are only two and a half months into 2025 and some states’ Houses of Assembly have already been shaken up massively. This shows us that we cannot take either stability or democratic processes for granted. “As we further embark on this journey, it is essential to reflect on the significance of uniform standing orders within the states’ Houses of Assembly. These orders serve as the backbone of legislative procedures, ensuring consistency, transparency and efficiency in the legislative processes. “The objectives of harmonising these orders are clear: to create a standardised approach that fosters collaboration, reduces procedural discrepancies and enhances the overall effectiveness of the legislative bodies,” she said. The Director-General, National Institute for Legislative and Democratic Studies, Prof Abubakar Sulaiman, noted the vulnerability of legislatures as a result of executive interference. He stressed that the…

    36 STATE ASSEMBLIES ADOPT, RATIFY HARMONIZED STANDING ORDERS

    36 STATE ASSEMBLIES ADOPT, RATIFY HARMONIZED STANDING ORDERS To tackle discrepancies in suspension, impeachment of members and other legislative procedures, the 36 states’ Houses of Assembly have adopted and ratified the use of harmonised standing orders. The rules to be adopted at each of the 36 Houses of Assembly aim to ensure unity across the states in implementing disciplinary issues of suspension and impeachment, removal of presiding officers and other members, the conduct of budgetary processes, and confirmation of appointments forwarded by the executive arm of government. The harmonised orders also deal with the conduct of the election of presiding officers, adoption of legislative reports, statutory reports, and resolutions, ratifying constitutional alterations and treaties, the establishment of special, ad hoc committees, and the conduct of executive sessions. The harmonised standing orders were adopted and ratified when the Conference of Speakers of State Legislatures of Nigeria converged on Lagos, on Thursday, for a workshop organised by the Konrad Adenauer Stiftung in collaboration with the National Institute for Legislative and Democratic Studies. In his remarks, the Chairman of the Conference of Speakers, Adebo Ogundoyin, noted that by adopting the harmonised standing orders, Nigeria was joining other countries like the United States of America, South Africa and Rwanda which had harmonised legislative frameworks. Ogundoyin, who is the Speaker of the Oyo State House of Assembly, noted that the harmonised standing orders for states would ensure that state legislatures have standardised rules, which would give their actions and ensure accountable governance. Ogundoyin expressed optimism that the various Houses of Assembly would adopt the uniform rules for use in their states, within the next three months. “This monumental step forward, which began in 2021 is not just a procedural reform; it is a strategic step towards strengthening the efficiency, transparency, and uniformity of legislative operations across all states Houses of Assembly. By standardising our legislative rules, we are enhancing collaboration, improving legislative oversight, and ultimately ensuring a more responsive and accountable governance framework at the sub-national level. “We are happy to draw inspiration from our partners, the German Government and the United States of America, whose 50 states operate a centralised standing order. “On the African continent, South Africa and Rwanda stand tall in this regard, and Nigeria is set to join the list of countries with harmonised legislative frameworks, further solidifying our commitment to democratic governance and institutional strengthening,” Ogundoyin said. Setting the tone for the event, Resident Representative, Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung Nigeria, Marija Peran, said harmonising the assemblies’ rules aimed to create a standardised approach that fosters collaboration, reduces procedural discrepancies and enhances the overall effectiveness of the legislative bodies. Pointing to the imbroglio in the Lagos and Rivers states Houses of Assembly, Peran noted that the harmonisation of standing orders would ensure consistency, transparency and efficiency in the legislative processes. With the harmonised standing orders, she said state Houses of Assembly were on the path of a more cohesive legislative environment. “We are only two and a half months into 2025 and some states’ Houses of Assembly have already been shaken up massively. This shows us that we cannot take either stability or democratic processes for granted. “As we further embark on this journey, it is essential to reflect on the significance of uniform standing orders within the states’ Houses of Assembly. These orders serve as the backbone of legislative procedures, ensuring consistency, transparency and efficiency in the legislative processes. “The objectives of harmonising these orders are clear: to create a standardised approach that fosters collaboration, reduces procedural discrepancies and enhances the overall effectiveness of the legislative bodies,” she said. The Director-General, National Institute for Legislative and Democratic Studies, Prof Abubakar Sulaiman, noted the vulnerability of legislatures as a result of executive interference. He stressed that the…

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

    You Missed

    36 STATE ASSEMBLIES ADOPT, RATIFY HARMONIZED STANDING ORDERS

    36 STATE ASSEMBLIES ADOPT, RATIFY HARMONIZED STANDING ORDERS

    COURT RESTRAINS INEC FROM RECEIVING PETITION FOR RECALL OF NATASHA

    I APOLOGIZE FOR MY MISCONDUCT IN COURT – NNAMDI KANU

    WIKE WINS AGAIN AT SUPREME COURT AS ALLY, SAMUEL ANYANWU, RECLAIM PDP NATIONAL SECRETARY SEAT

    BREAKING: PDP NATIONAL SECRETARY: ANYANWU WINS AT SUPREME COURT