MANY CRUSHED TO DEATH AT POLICE CHECKPOINT IN ABIA

download 10

MANY CRUSHED TO DEATH AT POLICE CHECKPOINT IN ABIA

At least 18 travellers were killed in a crash on the Umuahia-Enugu axis of the Port Harcourt Enugu Highway on Thursday morning.

It was gathered that the accident occurred at a police checkpoint around the Lokpanta area of Abia State in the wee hours of Thursday.

It was also learned that an 18-seater commercial bus was at the checkpoint awaiting police clearance when a truck driver lost control and rammed into them killing the driver and all the passengers.

According to The Nation, an eyewitness, Bananas Okereke, told our reporter on the telephone that the bodies of victims still littered the scene at 8:20 am.

He said: “The road is blocked by protesting bus drivers and other motorists who are asking that the policemen who caused the accident be brought back to the scene.

“Colleagues of the bus driver and other road users have taken over the road, demanding Justice for the victims. They vowed to remain there until Governor Alex Otti visits the scene.”

  • Dons Eze

    DONS EZE, PhD, Political Philosopher and Journalist of over four decades standing, worked in several newspaper houses across the country, and rose to the positions of Editor and General Manager. A UNESCO Fellow in Journalism, Dr. Dons Eze, a prolific writer and author of many books, attended several courses on Journalism and Communication in both Nigeria and overseas, including a Postgraduate Course on Journalism at Warsaw, Poland; Strategic Communication and Practical Communication Approach at RIPA International, London, the United Kingdom, among others.

    Related Posts

    PETER OBI BACKS TINUBU’S TAX REFORM BILLS, SAYS THEY ARE OVER DUE

    PETER OBI BACKS TINUBU’S TAX REFORMS, SAYS THEY ARE OVERDUE The 2023 presidential candidate of the Labour Party (LP), Peter Obi, has expressed support for President Bola Tinubu’s administration over its proposed tax reform bills, describing the reforms as critical and long overdue. President Tinubu’s Tax Reform Committee, headed by Taiwo Oyedele, has faced backlash in Northern Nigeria, with various groups calling for the passage of the bills. Adding to the opposition, Borno State Governor Babagana Zulum argued that the proposed tax reforms would benefit states like Lagos and Rivers, leaving others at a disadvantage if implemented. However, a statement from the presidency explained that President Bola Tinubu proposed tax reforms to streamline Nigeria’s tax administration and create a more business-friendly environment. In response to concerns raised by some stakeholders over the bills, President Tinubu ordered a comprehensive review to address the issues. Meanwhile, legislators in the National Assembly have suspended action on the bills, calling on the executive arm to provide further clarifications and insights into the proposed reforms. In a statement via X on Monday, Peter Obi, the former Governor of Anambra State, stated that there is nothing wrong with pursuing the tax reform bills. Read Also: Nigeria, others lose $50b yearly to tax evasionHowever, Peter Obi asserted that a public hearing on tax reform is essential for Nigerians from all walks of life to engage meaningfully. According to Obi, the federal government must sensitize the masses and secure their buy-in for policy changes. The statement reads: “Tax reform is a critical issue, and there is nothing wrong with pursuing it. However, such reform must be subject to robust and informed public debate. A public hearing on tax reform is essential, allowing Nigerians from all walks of life to engage meaningfully. This is how we build public trust and ensure inclusivity in policymaking. “Matters of this magnitude require extensive deliberation and careful consideration—they should never be rushed. Public hearings must be conducted to allow for diverse opinions and inputs. Such public hearing would also enable the broadest spectrum of public opinion to be reflected in public policy. “When considering tax reforms and similar issues, it is insufficient to focus solely on the benefits to the government, particularly in terms of increasing revenue collection. We must also take into account the overall impact on the nation and the sustainability of all its regions. Furthermore, the government must sensitize the people and secure their buy-in for any policy changes. Trust and legitimacy are the foundation of effective governance, and without them, even the best-intended reforms may fail. “Let us prioritize transparency, deliberation, and public engagement in charting the path forward. This is how we build a truly participatory democracy.”

    HOW DELE FAROUNBI DEFAMED ME, BY AFE BABALOLA

    HOW DELE FAROUNBI DEFAMED ME, Byy Afey BABALOLA The petition by Aare Babalola, dated November 9, 2024, to the Commissioner of Police in Ekiti State explicates the gravamen of his complaints to the police and the pedestal of his action against Farotimi. Asterisked are defamatory portions in Dele Farotimi’s foreword in his book that stirred the hornets’ nest Dear Sir, CRIMINAL DEFAMATION OF AARE AFE BABALOLA, AFE BABALOLA & CO AND HER LAWYERS BY DELE FAROTIMI I write to report the criminal defamation of myself, my law firm Afe Babalola & Co and my lawyers in person of Olu Daramola SAN and Ola Faro by one Dele Farotimi in his book titled ‘NIGERIA AND ITS CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM’ published by Dele Farotimi publishers in respect of Suit no: SC/146/2005: Major Muritala Gbadamosi Eletu & Ors V.H.R.H Oba Tijani Akinloye & Ors. SUIT NO: SC/146/2005: MAJOR MURITALA GBADAMOSI ELETU & ORS V. H.R.H OBA TIJANI AKINLOYE & ORS (2013) 15 NWLR PART 1378. We were solicitors to the Gbadamosi Eletu family in the case of Major Muritala Gbadamosi Eletu & Ors V. H.R.H Oba Tijani Akinloye & Ors. The Appellants lost the case at the High Court and the Court of Appeal before briefing my law firm to represent them at the Supreme Court. The Appellant in this suit were Defendants at the High Court. The subject matter of the suit was 254 hectares of land at Osapa Eti-Osa Local Government Lagos sold to the late Gbadamosi Bamidele Eletu in 1977 by the Ojomu family. The said parcel of land was later acquired by Lagos State Government after it was sold to the Gbadamosi Bamidele Eletu by the Ojomu family. The Ojomu family contested the acquisition against Lagos State Government in Suit No: ID/1883/89 wherein the court set aside the acquisition by the Lagos State Government. The Ojomu family then instituted the suit at the High Court of Lagos State claiming that title to the land had reverted to the Ojomu family despite the earlier sale of the land to late Gbadamosi Bamidele Eletu. We represented the Eletu family and Judgement was delivered by the Supreme Court on 13/7/2013 in favour of the Eletu family wherein the Supreme Court held that: “Where a party has fully divested himself of all interest in land, no right vests in him to deal with the same property by way of further alienation anymore. He is caught by the maxim, nemo dat quod non habet; that is, he cannot give that which he no longer has. In the instant case, it was unfortunate that the respondents claimed title to the whole of their family land compulsorily acquired by the Lagos State Government including the portion earlier sold to the father of the appellants and in which they were in effective possession. The claim so made without disclosing the truth and excluding the said portion so sold was clearly made in bad faith and smacked of insincerity. It was very unconscionable and consequently against the principles of equity and good conscience.” The Supreme Court also held that: “A court of law should not allow itself to be used as an engine for the perpetration of fraud, in whatever guise.” A copy of the judgment is hereby attached as annexure 1. VARIATION OF JUDGEMENT Honourable Justice Kumai Bayang AKA AHS JSC wrote the lead judgement. His Lordship erroneously limited the land of the Appellants to 10 hectares (24.17 acres) in respect to Suit no: M/779/93 whose subject matter was part of the 254 hectares owned by the Eletu family. We immediately filed a motion for variation of the judgement of the Supreme Court pursuant to Order 8 Rule 16 of the Rules of Court. The said motion was heard and…

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

    You Missed

    PETER OBI BACKS TINUBU’S TAX REFORM BILLS, SAYS THEY ARE OVER DUE

    HOW DELE FAROUNBI DEFAMED ME, BY AFE BABALOLA

    TRUMP SEEKS TO OVERTURN BIDEN’S PARDON OF SON

    NAMIBIA ELECTS FIRST FEMALE PRESIDENT

    WHAT DELE FAROUNBI WROTE ABOUT AFE BABALOLA

    • By Dons Eze
    • December 4, 2024
    • 135 views

    OUR GAINS FROM VISIT TO FRANCE, BY ENUGU GOVERNOR, PETER MBAH