WE’LL LEAVE LABOUR PARTY IF INTERNAL CRISIS PERSISTS – PETER OBI

download 16 1

WE’LL LEAVE LABOUR PARTY IF INTERNAL CRISIS PERSISTS – PETER OBI

Peter Obi, a former Anambra State governor and Labour Party’s presidential candidate in the 2023 general elections, has said that he might abandon the party if the internal turmoil persists.

Obi said he had been striving hard to solve the internal crisis in the party, but will not die with the party.

The Labour Party (LP) finds itself embroiled in a leadership and ownership dispute, primarily revolving around the conflicting factions led by Julius Abure and Apapa Lamidi.

This crisis has deepened with the Nigeria Labour Congress (NLC) asserting ownership over the party.

The discord reached a crescendo when Julius Abure was controversially reelected as the National Chairman during a convention held in Anambra State.

Notably, Peter Obi boycotted the convention, citing the failure of the party leadership under Abure to conduct extensive consultations with key stakeholders beforehand.

In his statement, Obi emphasised the necessity of undertaking corrective measures to salvage the Labour Party.

He expressed his unwavering commitment to fostering positive change in Nigeria, prioritising national interests over party affiliations.

Obi said, “Our engagement is about Nigeria; they are trying to change our focus. What we want to do is not about the Labour Party; it is about what the Obidients want to do about Nigeria.

“We are thinking about water, we are thinking about power, we are thinking about employment, and we are thinking about security. That should be our focus.

“The other matter we will deal with. We were somewhere; we didn’t start with Labour.

“I’m a Christian. Jesus said, When you go into a city, try to change them; live with them; fast with them. In the end, if you can’t, come out and even wash the sand that is on your shoes.

“He didn’t say go there and die with them. I tell you, I’m making spirited efforts to change them (LP), but I’m not going to die with them.

“That will not stop what we set out to do. We will try to change them (LP); if we can’t, we will leave them; we will not die with them.”

  • Dons Eze

    DONS EZE, PhD, Political Philosopher and Journalist of over four decades standing, worked in several newspaper houses across the country, and rose to the positions of Editor and General Manager. A UNESCO Fellow in Journalism, Dr. Dons Eze, a prolific writer and author of many books, attended several courses on Journalism and Communication in both Nigeria and overseas, including a Postgraduate Course on Journalism at Warsaw, Poland; Strategic Communication and Practical Communication Approach at RIPA International, London, the United Kingdom, among others.

    Related Posts

    L ABOUR PARTY AND CHALLENGE OF DEMOCRACY

    LABOUR PARTY AND CHALLENGE OF DEMOCRACYDemocracy is based on popular participation of the people in their government. Internal democracy is a constitutional requirement which ensures the participation of the members of a political party in the affairs of their political party. This right is granted them by giving them the exclusive privilege to elect the members of their Party’s ruling organs. Section 223(1)(a)(2)(a) of the 1999 Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria (CFRN) as amended, provides for the periodical election, on a democratic basis, not exceeding four years, of the principal officers and members of the executive committee or other governing body of a political party. The democratic basis in section 82(3) of the Electoral Act (EA) means that the election of members of the governing body of a political party, including the election to fill a vacant position in any of the governing bodies, shall be conducted in a democratic manner which allows all members of the party or their duly elected delegates to vote in support of a candidate of their choice. Any other route apart from this route to impose leadership on any party is illegal and a destruction of internal democracy and as such null and void.The Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) is empowered by law to ensure that political parties observe the practices of internal democracy, including the fair and transparent conduct of party congresses and conventions. The law did this in section 82(1) and (5) of the EA when it instructed any political party that wants to elect its National Officers to give the Commission at least 21 days’ notice of any convention, congress, conference or meeting convened for the purpose of electing members of its governing bodies. Failure to do this renders the convention invalid. The whole idea of giving INEC 21 days notice is to enable INEC to monitor that the parties comply with the provisions of the law and ensure fairness and transparency in the election of their officers.It then means that any party that fails to invite INEC, through the requisite 21 days notice, intends not to observe internal democracy in organising its elections and also intends not to be fair and transparent in its elections. INEC will be failing in its duties to lend its name to such a desecration of the laws by the party and would have been a willing tool in the destruction of our democracy. The proper thing INEC should do is to ignore such a charade and treat it as having not been done. We have become so lawless and so litigious that we think the courts must give orders before we perform our duties. No! Courts are meant to settle disputes, not to do the work for people. INEC doesn’t need a court order to ignore any national executive of a political party which emerged in a manner not known to law because in the eyes of the law, there was no convention. Paragraph 15(b)(c) of third schedule to the CFRN empowers INEC to register political parties and monitor the organisation and operation of the political parties. Any party that fails to comply with the laws should be penalised by INEC by refusing to recognise the officers that are responsible for the breaching of the laws.What is happening in Labour Party (LP) today is a reflection of lawlessness and impunity that have characterised our fourth republic and this is threatening to destroy our democracy. It is important to note that other parties are suffering from one problem or the other and if this trend is not checked and corrected, Nigerians will lose interest completely in the democratic process. By the communique released recently by the expired, former Abure-led National Working Committee (NWC) of the LP,…

    ONE YEAR OF TINUBU’S MINISTERS

    ONE YEAR OF TINUBU’S MINISTERS PRESIDENT Bola Tinubu has one of the largest cabinets in Nigeria’s history, comparable to Olusegun Obasanjo’s administration, which had 47 ministers in 1999. Despite his promise to appoint technocrats to drive his Renewed Hope Agenda, Tinubu’s cabinet appears to be a mix of politicians, loyalists, and a sprinkling of experts.One year after their appointment, it has been a mixed result with many failing to deliver on their mandate. One of the key promises of Tinubu’s administration was economic revitalisation. Under the stewardship of the Minister of Finance, Wale Edun, the economy has seen both commendable efforts and areas of concern.The administration has introduced bold reforms, such as unified exchange rates and the removal of petrol subsidies. These policies have sparked inflation and public dissatisfaction.The raft of reforms has also failed to reflate the economy or strengthen the naira, which has continued to lose its value against the greenback. This is because the country is not producing. Edun’s reforms could, at best, be described as an attempt to make a dead horse walk.The much-anticipated job creation drive has yet to produce the expected results. Unemployment and underemployment continue to plague the country, with the youth disproportionately affected. The employment initiatives, though well-intentioned, have yet to materialise into significant job opportunities.Infrastructure development has been a focal point of Tinubu’s government, with the Minister of Works, Dave Umahi, tasked with overseeing critical projects. The administration has made strides in continuing and initiating key infrastructural projects. However, the pace of development has been slower than promised. Bureaucratic delays, funding gaps, and security concerns have hindered progress.So far, the government has awarded 51 contracts worth N6.27 trillion to procure, construct, and develop various infrastructural projects across the federation. The contracts, awarded between October 2023 and May 2024, would facilitate infrastructural projects, including roads, bridges, train systems, and airport infrastructure.The minister’s leadership has been stable, but a greater push is needed to meet its ambitious targets. The focus on completing ongoing projects from previous administrations is a positive sign of continuity, but new projects are crucial to meet the growing demands of Nigeria’s burgeoning population. The coming years will test the government’s ability to turn ambitious infrastructure plans, especially the Lagos-Calabar Coastal Highway and the Badagry-Sokoto superhighway, into reality.Security remains a paramount concern for Nigerians, and the performance of the Minister of Defence is crucial in this regard. Despite some efforts to combat insurgency and banditry, many Nigerians still feel unsafe. The situation in the North-East and North-West regions has shown little improvement. Bandits are still occupying territories in the North-West and preventing farmers from accessing their farmlands.While there have been successful military operations, the overall strategy seems reactive rather than proactive. The administration must rethink its security policies to provide lasting peace and stability. The minister of defence has failed in his assignment.Despite the administration’s efforts in other areas, health and education have not received the attention they deserve. The health sector remains underfunded and ill-equipped to handle the country’s needs, while the education system continues to struggle with inadequate infrastructure, frequent strikes, and poor quality of instruction.These sectors are critical for the country’s future, and the lack of significant progress in these areas is concerning. The administration should prioritise investments in health and education if it hopes to foster a well-educated and healthy population capable of driving economic growth and social development.Reengineering bureaucracy as engine room of governmentThe healthcare system is still underfunded and overburdened, and the minister’s efforts to improve it have not yet had a noticeable impact. The Minister of Health and Social Welfare, Ali Pate, has failed to make the necessary impacts in the sector, which is reeling under the exit of professionals leaving the country in droves.Similarly, the…

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

    You Missed

    ABACHA SPIRIT HAS TAKEN OVER PRESIDENTIAL VILLA – LAWYER

    • By Dons Eze
    • September 10, 2024
    • 7 views

    DSS INTERROGATED ME ON ALLEGED TERRORISM FINANCING INVOLVING BRITISH NATIONAL – AJAERO REVEALS WHY HE WAS ARRESTED

    • By Dons Eze
    • September 10, 2024
    • 27 views

    POLICE IGNORED OUR PETITION ON AJAERO FOR OVER ONE YEAR BUT STARTED ACTING AFTER THE PETITION WAS WITHDRAWN – AIR PEACE

    • By Dons Eze
    • September 10, 2024
    • 63 views

    WE KNOW SPONSORS OF #ENDBADGOVERNANCE PROTEST – PDP

    • By Dons Eze
    • September 10, 2024
    • 32 views

    APC POSTPONES NATIONAL CAUCUS MEETING INDEFINITELY

    • By Dons Eze
    • September 10, 2024
    • 31 views

    NULGE CHAIRMAN SLUMPS DIES WHILE WAITING TO BUY FUEL

    • By Dons Eze
    • September 10, 2024
    • 78 views