COURT REJECTS SOWORE’S EVIDENCE THAT TINUBU CALLED JONATHAN ‘DRUNKARD’

19524231 courtgavel1 jpege32ce3ca02e9f7ba53e3b466710e74ad 1

The Federal High Court sitting in Abuja, on Wednesday, rejected an evidence that President Bola Tinubu had in 2011, called former President Goodluck Jonathan a drunkard.

The exhibit which an activist and former presidential candidate of the African Action Congress (AAC), Omoyele Sowore, who is answering to a cybercrime charge, tendered before the court, alleged that Tinubu equally called the then President Jonathan “a sinking fisherman.”

Trial Justice Mohammed Umar declined to admit the exhibit in evidence, stressing that a witness, through whom the defendant sought to tender the printed document, distanced himself from it.

The witness, Mr. Cyril Nosike, who was identified as an operative of the Department of State Services (DSS), had while being cross-examined by Sowore’s lawyer, Mr. Abubakar Marshal, told the court that he was not aware that President Tinubu made such remarks against ex-President Jonathan.

Based on the stance of Mr. Nosike who is the first prosecution witness, PW-1, in the matter, counsel to the DSS, Mr. Akinlolu Kehinde, SAN, challenged the admissibility of the printed document.

He insisted that the exhibit did not meet the threshold of admissibility as enunciated in the Evidence Act, since the witness was not the maker of the document.

Sowore’s lawyer had asked the witness if he was aware that as at 2011, President Tinubu was a major opposition figure, a question the PW-1 declined to answer, insisting he would not want to comment on such issue.

Asked if he was aware that as at 2011, Tinubu called the then President Jonathan “corrupt and shameless,” the witness answered in the negative.

Meantime, following a similar objection by the prosecution counsel, the court rejected another document that Sowore’s lawyer sought to tender, which alleged that Tinubu had also called former President Olusegun Obasanjo “an expired meat.”

Earlier in the proceedings, Sowore’s lawyer asked the witness if he had any evidence to show that corruption has ended in Nigeria, a question that answered in the negative.

“My Lord, he is asking for my opinion. I am not here to give an opinion,” the PW-1 added.

Asked if he was aware that the DSS had in December 2025, dismissed 115 officers for corruption, the witness said he could only recall that the officers were dismissed on the strength of on internal investigation and not corruption allegation.

Asked if he was aware that in 2025, the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) charged five former Governors for corruption, the witness said he was not aware.

Also asked if he was aware that in 2025, the EFCC arrested officials of the NNPCL over a N7. 2bn fraud, the witness said he was not aware.

Asked if he was aware that in 2025, the EFCC dismissed 27 officers for fraud and misconduct, the witness said he was not aware.

Confirming that he monitors the cyberspace 24 hours, the witness said he only concentrates on issues bordering on national security and not matters that are outside his mandate.

Asked if the dismissal of 115 officers by the DSS was not enough to attract his attention, the witness said it was not part of his duty.

At this juncture, the defence counsel produced publications about the dismissal of DSS officers for corruption.

When he asked the witness to look at the document and confirm that the case against the officers bordered on fraud and corruption, the PW-1 said he could not do so because he was not part of the process that led to the dismissal of the officers.

The witness also denied knowledge of the global corruption ranking, adding that he was not equally aware of the Transparency International’s Corruption Index.

Asked if he was aware that Nigeria ranked 140 out of 180 countries in the global corruption index, the witness said he was not aware.

Answering more questions under cross-examination, the witness said though he knows Chief Femi Fani Kayode (FFK) as an Ambassador-designate, he said he was not aware that he was a vocal critic of President Tinubu.

Asked if he was aware of a trending issue on social media where FFK claimed that Tinubu knew about the death of Chief Funsho Williams, his political opponent in Lagos State that was gruesomely murdered, the witness said he was not aware.

Asked if he was aware that the DSS screened FFK as an Ambassador-designate, the witness said he was not aware.

The witness however admitted that he has heard of Chief Funsho Williams, but said he could not recall that he was murdered in Lagos while Tinubu was the governor of the state.

The PW-1 further denied knowledge of any video by another Ambassador-designate, Mr. Reno Omokri, accusing Tinubu of complicity in Chief William’s murder.

He also told the court that he was not aware that Mr. Omokri staged protests in London where he accused Tinubu of being a drug lord.

Justice Umar adjourned the case till March 5

About Dons Eze

DONS EZE, PhD, Political Philosopher and Journalist of over four decades standing, worked in several newspaper houses across the country, and rose to the positions of Editor and General Manager. A UNESCO Fellow in Journalism, Dr. Dons Eze, a prolific writer and author of many books, attended several courses on Journalism and Communication in both Nigeria and overseas, including a Postgraduate Course on Journalism at Warsaw, Poland; Strategic Communication and Practical Communication Approach at RIPA International, London, the United Kingdom, among others.

Check Also

WIKE LAMENTS LOW TURNOUT IN FCT ELECTION

Minister of the Federal Capital Territory (FCT), Nyesom Wike, has lamented over the low turnout …

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sahifa Theme License is not validated, Go to the theme options page to validate the license, You need a single license for each domain name.