AKPABIO’S WIFE SUES NATASHA AKPOTI FOR N250BN OVER SEXUAL HARASSMENT ALLEGATION

Screenshot 2025 03 01 6.51.42 AM

AKPABIO’S WIFE SUES NATASHA AKPOTI FOR N250BN OVER SEXUAL HARASSMENT ALLEGATION

Wife of the President of the Senate, Mrs. Unoma Godswill Akpabio, has instituted multiple lawsuits against Kogi Central Senator, Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan following her sexual harassment allegations against her husband.

She filed a fundamental rights and defamation suits against Natasha-Akpoti at the Federal Capital Territory, FCT, High Court, following sexual harassment claims against her husband.

In the suits, Anoma sought N250 billion as general damages.

Natasha-Akpoti had claimed that Akpabio was victimizing her in the Senate because she refused to sleep with him.

She recounted how the Senate President made several sexual overtures at her, even in the presence of her husband.

But, Anioma had dismissed her claims, saying she was lying and creating contents for her personal gains.

Addressing a press conference yesterday, Anioma threatened legal actions against Natasha.

The fundamental rights suit (Suit No: CV/814/25), was brought under Section 34(1)(a) of the 1999 Constitution (as amended) and Article 4 & 5 of The African Charter on Human And Peoples Rights (Ratification And Enforcement Act) Cap. A9, Laws of the Federation of Nigeria, 2004.

Mrs. Akpabio sought the following, “A DECLARATION that the allegations made by the Respondent on the floor of the Senate on the 20th of February 2025 and subsequent scandalous and salacious allegations on Arise News TV by the Respondent, constitute a flagrant violation of the fundamental rights of the Applicant guaranteed under Section 34(1) (A) of The Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, 1999 (As Amended), Article 4 & 5 of The African Charter on Human And Peoples Rights (Ratification And Enforcement Act) Cap. A9, Laws of the Federation of Nigeria, 2004, and Section 14 of the Violence Against Persons (Prohibition) Act, 2015.

“AN ORDER OF PERPETUAL INJUNCTION restraining the Respondent from making further inciteful, scandalous, and spiteful statements that have caused the Applicant and her children emotional and psychological abuse and living under constant threat and fear of their lives.

“AN ORDER OF PERPETUAL INJUNCTION restraining the Respondent, whether by themselves, their agents, privies, or whosoever from further inciteful, scandalous, and spiteful statements that have caused the Applicant and her children emotional and psychological abuse and living under constant threat and fear of their lives or in any other manner infringing on their fundamental rights.

“AN ORDER awarding the sum of N250,000,000,000.00 (Two Hundred and Fifty Billion Naira only) as exemplary, punitive, aggravated and general damages against the Respondent for her infringement of the fundamental rights of the Applicant alongside such further or other Orders as this Honourable Court may deem fit to make in the circumstance.”

Additionally, in a separate defamation lawsuit (Suit No: CV/816/25), Mrs. Akpabio seeks: “A DECLARATION that the Defendant’s act of claiming on national television, that the Claimant’s husband, who is the President of the Senate of the Federal Republic of Nigeria made sexual advances at her, without any proof of same, has damaged the reputation of the Claimant and indeed her entire family, bringing them into disrepute and opprobrium.

“AN ORDER OF THIS HONOURABLE COURT mandating the Defendant to issue a formal written retraction of the defamatory words and tender an unconditional apology to the Claimant and her family, to be published in 2 (two) nationally-read newspapers to wit: The Guardian and This Day Newspapers.

“AN ORDER OF THIS HONOURABLE COURT compelling the Defendant to pay to the Claimant the sum of N1,000,000,000.00 (One Billion Naira only) as punitive and exemplary damages for the ruinous effect of the Defendant’s defamatory words on the Claimant’s family’s reputation.

“AN ORDER OF PERPETUAL INJUNCTION restraining the Defendant from further uttering any defamatory words or causing to be uttered or spread, any defamatory words against the reputation of the Claimant’s family.”

  • Dons Eze

    DONS EZE, PhD, Political Philosopher and Journalist of over four decades standing, worked in several newspaper houses across the country, and rose to the positions of Editor and General Manager. A UNESCO Fellow in Journalism, Dr. Dons Eze, a prolific writer and author of many books, attended several courses on Journalism and Communication in both Nigeria and overseas, including a Postgraduate Course on Journalism at Warsaw, Poland; Strategic Communication and Practical Communication Approach at RIPA International, London, the United Kingdom, among others.

    Related Posts

    NATASHA AKPOTI ONCE ACCUSED RENO OMOKRI OF SEXUAL HARASSMENT AND DELETED IT

    NATASHA AKPOTI ONCE ACCUSED RENO OMOKRI OF SEXUAL HARASSMENT AND DELETED IT It is no longer news that Senator Natasha Akpoti has accused the Senate President, Godswill Akpabio, of sexual harassment. However, how true are her claims? In law, they say, the best predictor of present and future allegations are your past accusations. Some Nigerians may recall that this is not the first time the junior Senator from Kogi has made sexual allegations against prominent men. On Tuesday, 12 October 2021, Senator Natasha Akpoti alleged that former Presidential spokesman Reno Omokri had sexually harassed her on 6 May 2014 during a state banquet for Kenyan President Uhuru Kenyatta. In response, Mr Omokri, known for his meticulous record-keeping, announced a $50,000 reward for anyone who could provide a photograph or video of him at the Uhuru Kenyatta banquet. Mr Omokri thereafter provided evidence in the form of a British Airways ticket and Nigerian and American immigration stamps on his passport, proving he was not in the country during the event. In fact, at the date and time when Senator Akpoti had alleged that he sexually harassed her, Mr Omokri was in the United States as a personal envoy of then President Jonathan, who sent him to the US to counter the negative publicity arising from the Chibok kidnapping. While in the US, Omokri met and was photographed with State Department officials. Natasha Akpoti, who accused him, then deleted all traces of her accusation from her social media profiles. Mr Omokri later posted that he had received a large sum of money as an out-of-court settlement.

    DISSECTING LEGAL BATTLE OVER HERBERT WIGWE’S ESTATE AND INHERITANCE

    DISSECTING LEGAL BATTLE OVER HERBERT WIGWE’S ESTATE AND INHERITANCE The recent ruling by Hon. Justice Adeyemi of the Ikeja High Court (Family & Probate) in the estate administration case of the late Herbert Onyewumbu Wigwe has drawn significant attention, especially on social media. The case, Suit No. ID/7735FPM/2024, was initiated by Christian Wigwe and Pastor Shyngle Wigwe against Uche Wigwe, Aigboje Aig-Imoukhuede, and Otutochi Wigwe. The ruling sheds light on crucial aspects of inheritance laws in Nigeria and the validity of wills and estate planning instruments. In estate law, two primary scenarios arise upon an individual’s death: testacy (where the deceased leaves a will) and intestacy (where no will exists). The Wills Law of Lagos State 2004 (WL) governs the execution of valid wills, requiring that a will be in writing, signed by the testator in the presence of at least two witnesses, and voluntarily made by a person of sound mind. Conversely, when an individual dies intestate, the Administration of Estates Law of Lagos State (AEL) 2015 dictates the distribution of assets. Section 46 of the AEL outlines the hierarchy of inheritance, prioritizing the spouse and children of the deceased over other relatives. The ruling in Salubi v Nwariaku (2003) reaffirmed this order, emphasizing that inheritance rights are not merely based on biological relationships but on legal provisions and the testator’s expressed wishes. Herbert Wigwe’s will, executed outside Nigeria, was submitted for probate in Nigeria. The document named three individuals in alternative capacities as personal representatives and trustees, including his wife, Doreen Wigwe, his cousin Uche Wigwe, and Aigboje Aig-Imoukhuede. The motion filed by the claimants sought three primary reliefs: Appointment of interim administrators; Appointment of interim guardians/supervisors for the estate and granting a Norwich Pharmacal Order (NPO) to obtain information related to the estate’s management. Justice Adeyemi denied all three prayers, citing legal precedents that prevent courts from deciding substantive issues at the interlocutory stage. The court referenced Shanu v Afribank (Nig) Plc (2002), reinforcing that such applications should not preempt the full trial process. For Interim Administrators and Guardianship, one of the primary issues before the court was the appointment of interim administrators. The court observed that the claimants’ prayers for interim administration closely mirrored the substantive claims in the suit, rendering the application procedurally flawed. The court emphasized that substantive issues should be determined at trial rather than through interlocutory applications. Additionally, the court dismissed the claim for further guardianship oversight, noting that Otutochi Wigwe, the adult daughter of the deceased, had already been lawfully appointed as the guardian of her minor siblings. In the request for Norwich Pharmacal Order (NPO), a legal mechanism used to obtain information in cases of suspected wrongdoing, the court said the claimants failed to provide prima facie evidence of fraud, financial mismanagement, or coercion by the estate’s administrators. Under Nigerian law, an NPO requires clear proof of suspected fraud, duress, or financial malpractice. Since the claimants merely made allegations without supporting evidence, the court found no justification for granting such an order. The Inheritance Rights and Familial Relationships is a major contention in the case was the claimants’ assertion of inheritance rights based on close familial relationships with Herbert Wigwe. Pastor Shyngle Wigwe, the father of the deceased, and Christian Wigwe, a cousin, sought to assert a role in estate administration. However, the court reaffirmed that inheritance and estate administration are governed by statutory provisions and the expressed wishes of the testator, not simply biological ties. The ruling upheld that only legally recognized beneficiaries, such as the spouse and children, hold enforceable claims to the estate. ruling in the Wigwe case underscores the necessity of clear estate planning and adherence to legal processes. It also highlights the judiciary’s role in preventing legal maneuvers…

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

    You Missed

    NATASHA AKPOTI ONCE ACCUSED RENO OMOKRI OF SEXUAL HARASSMENT AND DELETED IT

    DISSECTING LEGAL BATTLE OVER HERBERT WIGWE’S ESTATE AND INHERITANCE

    GAC, APC NOT CONSULTED BEFORE OBASA’S REMOVAL

    IBB’S A JOURNEY IN SERVICE: THE MISSING LINKS AND REPERCUSSIONS, BY PROFESSOR B. CHIMA OBIORA

    TRUMP ORDERS UKRAINIAN PRESIDENT, ZENLENSKY, OUT OF WHITE HOUSE

    WHY I ABANDONED 16-YEAR PRIESTHOOD TO BECOME NATIVE DOCTOR