2BABA’S FAMILY DECLARES HIM MISSING, PETITIONS SSS SEEKING INTERVENTION

image0 1 1 1 png

2BABA’S FAMILY DECLARES HIM MISSING, PETITIONS SSS SEEKING INTERVENTION

“ …This has led his family to suspect that his identity may have been compromised and that someone may have abducted him and is actively manipulating him to exploit his contacts for monetary gain”.

The controversy over Nigerian music star Innocent ‘2Baba’ Idibia’s divorce from his wife, Annie Macaulay, and his proposal to Natasha Osawaru have continued to dominate discussions.

2Baba’s mother, Rose Idibia, alleged in a video that Ms Osawaru, the deputy majority leader of the Edo State House of Assembly, had cast a spell on him.

Mrs Idibia claimed the singer was not in his right senses when he proposed to the 30-year-old lawmaker and pleaded with her to release him.

The proposal sparked widespread reactions on social media, mainly due to 2Baba’s ongoing divorce and the striking similarities between this engagement and his past proposal to Annie.

However, the situation took a dramatic turn on Friday when the singer’s family filed a petition declaring him missing with the State Security Services (SSS).

The petition signed by Wilson Anuge on behalf of Anuge, Anuge & Co. read: “We are writing to urgently seek your assistance regarding a profoundly troubling situation involving a member of the Idibia Family, Mr Innocent Idibia (also known as Tuface or 2Baba) who our client reasonably believe may be missing since Monday 10 February, 2025.

“We believe that Mr Innocent left his residence in the early hours of 10 February 2025 in his loungewear, suggestive that he was going on his habitual walk, but never returned home since then. Despite the best efforts of members of his family, his staff and management of his Record Label to reach or locate him, including reaching out to his friends and acquaintances, they have been unable to establish any contact or ascertain his whereabouts.”

The family of the ‘African Queen’ hitmaker revealed that since he left home, neither his record label, staff, nor close associates were able to reach him.

2Baba’s family expressed deep concern over his sudden disappearance, emphasising that his absence without any communication had raised serious alarm among them and his friends.

They described his disappearance as highly unusual, stressing that he had never been out of touch for such an extended period.

“By reason of his celebrity status. It’s established protocol for Mr Innocent to be accompanied by protective guards wherever he goes. However, on the day he was last seen, he left his residence unaccompanied by his protective guards, his Personal Assistant, or any of his staff. This disturbing discovery and the fact that those who ought to hear from him have not heard from him for over 72 hours left his entire family deeply concerned.

“Mr Innocent is a responsible individual, a family man and a dedicated artist who is very passionate about his art and often dedicates the better part of his time to songwriting, recording, and other studio-related activities. He’s never gone missing before, nor has he ever abandoned his work for such protracted hours”, said the family.

Abduction
The family also revealed that the singer’s sudden disappearance suggests he may have been abducted.

Additionally, they noted that since he went missing, his friends have received multiple calls from unknown individuals using his social media account to solicit financial assistance.

The singer’s family said, “These messages are alarming, as Mr Innocent is financially independent and has never required assistance in such a manner. This has led his family to suspect that his identity may have been compromised and that someone may have abducted him and is actively manipulating him to exploit his contacts for monetary gain.

“Adding to the family’s distress are the calls from several of his close friends that have received messages from what appears to be his social media account soliciting financial assistance. The implications of this situation are grave, and the possibility of foul play and coercion cannot be overlooked. As a family, our clients are deeply worried not only about his physical safety but also about the potential misuse of his identity while he remains unaccounted for.”

Moreover, the family stated that the distress call and other factors prompted them to seek the intervention of the SSS.

They emphasised their belief that the agency possesses the necessary resources and expertise to locate their son.

“In light of the above, I earnestly request the intervention of the Department of State Services to assist in locating Mr Innocent. The Services’ resources and expertise in handling issues of personal safety and coercion.

“Our humble request is that you intervene urgently to investigate, locate and rescue the victim from wherever the suspect is currently detaining him. We anticipate your unalloyed cooperation in this regard.”

2Baba’s family stated that his disappearance had traumatised them and his employees, while his musical empire had been left in a comatose.

“It is worthy of note that the victim is a legend and holds a celebrity status in the Nigerian music industry, and whom countless youths and citizens emulate, not to mention the victim’s wife, children, relations and employees who have become traumatised, and his musical empire which is now rendered comatose as a direct consequence of the suspect’s criminal act of abducting the victim and rendering him incommunicado.”

Ms Osawaru
The newspaper reported that 2Baba proposed to Ms Osawaru, a graduate of Igbinedion University, Edo State, on Thursday in the presence of friends.

In a viral video, the singer and Ms Osawaru danced together inside a house, surrounded by friends.

The footage also captured when 2Baba performed a song before presenting a ring to the lawmaker, who holds a Master’s in Film Production from Full Sail University, USA.

They then shared a long embrace.

The 49-year-old singer’s proposal to Ms Osawaru, a member of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP), followed a wave of online speculation after their photos and videos surfaced.

Their relationship became the talk of the town when 2Baba made an unexpected appearance at the State House of Assembly during a plenary session, fueling rumours and seemingly confirming his romance with Ms Osawaru.

On Tuesday, however, 2Baba dispelled all doubts by announcing on Instagram that he had married the lawmaker.

Background
Seventeen days after ending his relationship with Annie, the singer proposed to Ms Osawaru.

His romance with Annie began as a friendship in 1999 before blossoming into love.

Annie gained fame in 2004 after starring in 2Baba’s iconic ‘African Queen’ music video, which catapulted her into the spotlight.

In 2008, the couple welcomed their first daughter, Isabella. On Valentine’s Day in 2012, 2Baba proposed to Annie in Lagos, and they held a private wedding later that year.

Their grand white wedding took place in Dubai on 23 March 2013. The following year, they welcomed their second daughter, Olivia.

Throughout their marriage, they faced numerous challenges, mainly due to 2Baba’s past relationship with Pero Adeniyi, the mother of three of his children.

Despite public scrutiny and turbulence, they renewed their vows in 2022 to mark their 10th anniversary, reaffirming their commitment and solidifying their status as one of Nigeria’s most celebrated celebrity couples.

Following 2Baba’s divorce announcement on 27 January, Annie has remained absent from social media.

  • Dons Eze

    DONS EZE, PhD, Political Philosopher and Journalist of over four decades standing, worked in several newspaper houses across the country, and rose to the positions of Editor and General Manager. A UNESCO Fellow in Journalism, Dr. Dons Eze, a prolific writer and author of many books, attended several courses on Journalism and Communication in both Nigeria and overseas, including a Postgraduate Course on Journalism at Warsaw, Poland; Strategic Communication and Practical Communication Approach at RIPA International, London, the United Kingdom, among others.

    Related Posts

    LEGISLATIVE LAWYERS ASK SUPREME COURT TO REVIEW RIVERS ASSEMBLY JUDGEMENT

    LEGISLATIVE LAWYERS ASK SUPREME COURT TO REVIEW RIVERS JUDGEMENT The protracted political crisis in Rivers State took another twist on Thursday as the Association of Legislative Drafting and Advocacy Practitioners, ALDRAP, asked the Supreme Court to review its February 28, 2025, judgment that restored 27 members of the State Assembly, led by Speaker Martin Amaewhule. The Supreme Court, in the judgment delivered by Justice Emmanuel Akomaye Agim, also ordered Governor Sim Fubara to re-present the state’s 2025 budget to the Amaewhule-led Assembly. The apex court, in the same vein, stopped the payment of allocations from the Federation Account to the Rivers State Government. It ruled that funds would be released to Fubara’s government only when a lawful Appropriation Law is enacted by the Assembly led by Amaewhule. The budget had earlier been passed into law after Fubara presented it to the Victor Oko-Jumbo-led three-man faction of the Assembly. However, ALDRAP, an association of professional legislative lawyers, is asking the Supreme Court to review the judgment, which was seen by many as a final resolution of key issues involved in the Rivers political crisis. The legislative lawyers made the request for a review of the judgment in a letter dated March 13, 2025, and addressed to the Chief Justice of Nigeria, CJN. According to the letter signed by ALDRAP’s lawyer, Kenneth Amadi, the request is based on the provisions of Order 8 Rule 16 of the Supreme Court Rules, 2024. Among other contentions, the lawyers argued that the February 28 Supreme Court judgment did not comply with previous apex court verdicts on similar cases. The letter is titled “Application for Review by a Full Panel of Seven Justices of the Supreme Court of Nigeria of the Judgment of the Supreme Court of Nigeria Dated February 28, 2025, Delivered by Hon. Justice Emmanuel Agim, JSC, and a Panel of Five Justices, Pursuant to Order 8 Rule 16, Supreme Court Rules, 2024, and Other Relevant Laws as the Supreme Court Deems Appropriate.” Parts of the letter read: “By way of introduction, my name is Kenneth A. Amadi, Esq. I am a legal practitioner and lawyer to the Association of Legislative Drafting and Advocacy Practitioners (ALDRAP), which is a professional association of lawyers in Nigeria with its national secretariat inside the National Assembly complex, Abuja. “We write to request permission to submit an application on the above-named subject matter. This application for a review of the Supreme Court judgment of February 28, 2025, is made in accordance with the Supreme Court of Nigeria Rules, 2024, on the following grounds: “A full panel of seven judges instead of the five judges that sat on the Rivers State House of Assembly case. *”Failure of the panel of judges to follow and comply with the former judgments of the Supreme Court of Nigeria, such as the case of Attorney-General of Bendel State v. Attorney-General of the Federation (1981).” In an analysis of the verdict, the Executive Secretary of ALDRAP, Dr. Tonye Clinton Jaja, faulted the Supreme Court judgment for failing to take note of the record of proceedings of the Rivers State House of Assembly concerning the defection of the 27 lawmakers. Citing a court case, Hon. J. I. Ekpenkhio v. Hon. Matthew Egbadon (1962-2001)1 Legislative Law Reports of Nigeria (LLRN) pages 307 to 336, Jaja said: “The Supreme Court of Nigeria held that the Court has a duty to take judicial notice of the record of proceedings of the House of Assembly as stipulated under Section 73 of the Evidence Act. “In accordance with the above-named judgment, it is reasonable to expect that the Supreme Court of Nigeria would consider the words and actions of Amaewhule and the 26 others on the floor of the Rivers State House of…

    CONTEMPT: NATASHA DRAGS AKPABIO, OTHERS TO COURT

    CONTEMPT: NATASHA DRAGS AKPABIO, OTHERS TO COURT The President of the Senate, Godswill Akpabio, and other top legislative officials risk imprisonment for allegedly defying a court order. Senator Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan has initiated contempt proceedings against them, with the Federal High Court in Abuja issuing Form 48 as a notice of their disobedience. The legal action stems from suit No. FHC/ABJ/CS/384/2025, filed by Senator Akpoti-Uduaghan against the Clerk of the National Assembly, the Senate, Senate President Akpabio, and the Chairman of the Senate Committee on Ethics, Privileges, and Code of Conduct, Senator Neda Imasuem. The notice, signed by the court registrar pursuant to Section 72 of the Sheriff and Civil Process Act 2004, emphasised the gravity of the situation. Court Warns Akpabio, Senate Officials: Obey or Face Prison The court explicitly warned the defendants that their actions constitute contempt, which could lead to imprisonment if they fail to comply. “Despite being duly served with the enrolled order on the 5th day of March 2025, you, the Defendants/Contemnors, have deliberately and contumaciously disregarded its binding directive,” the court stated. The legal notice further reiterated: “Take notice that pursuant to Section 72 of the Sheriffs and Civil Processes Act, your wilful disobedience of the order of this Honourable Court renders you liable for contempt of court, for which you may be committed to prison unless you comply.” The court had previously issued an order on 4th March 2025, restraining the Senate from proceeding with an investigation into Senator Akpoti-Uduaghan’s alleged misconduct during a February 20 plenary session. The order mandated that all defendants, including Senate leadership, cease actions against the senator until a final determination on the case. Despite the clear directive, the defendants reportedly proceeded with the probe, leading to the contempt proceedings. The court highlighted that any actions taken in violation of its order are “null, void, and of no effect whatsoever.” The court’s enrolled order also granted permission for the plaintiff to serve the Senate with case documents through alternative means, including pasting them at the National Assembly or publishing them in national newspapers. Additionally, the order sought to prevent the Senate’s Ethics Committee, chaired by Senator Imasuem, from advancing its inquiry into Akpoti-Uduaghan’s conduct. The court required the Senate to show cause as to why an interlocutory injunction should not be granted, reinforcing that the plaintiff’s privileges as a senator must be upheld in accordance with the Nigerian Constitution, Senate Standing Orders, and the Legislative Houses (Powers and Privileges) Act. With the issuance of Form 48, the Senate President and other officials now face legal consequences unless they comply with the court’s directives. Observers note that this case underscores the judiciary’s role in checking legislative overreach and upholding the rule of law. Legal analysts believe that the next steps in the case could significantly impact the Senate’s operations and Akpabio’s leadership. Should the court escalate the matter to Form 49, which calls for direct committal proceedings, Akpabio and his co-defendants may be forced to personally defend their actions or face severe sanctions, including possible imprisonment. As the controversy unfolds, political watchers are keen to see whether the Senate leadership will comply with the court order or continue its defiant stance, potentially leading to a major constitutional confrontation.

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

    You Missed

    LEGISLATIVE LAWYERS ASK SUPREME COURT TO REVIEW RIVERS ASSEMBLY JUDGEMENT

    CONTEMPT: NATASHA DRAGS AKPABIO, OTHERS TO COURT

    PDP CRISIS: WIKE’S CAMP KICK AS IKIMI PANEL RECOMMENDS ANYANWU’S EXPULSION

    GROUPS VOICE OUT ANGER OVER ALLEGED PLANS TO IMPEACH FUBARA

    WIKE CALLED BAUCHI GOVERNOR, BALA MOHAMMED, A BETRAYER FOR RENEGING ON PLANS AGAINST ATIKU ABUBAKAR

    LAGOS, AFRICA’S SECOND LARGEST CITY ECONOMY AS GDP HITS $259BN