AS OPPOSITION APC WE PAID WOMEN FOR DEMONSTRATIONS AGAINST PRESIDENT JONATHAN’S GOVT – AMAECHI

19042099 rotimiamaechi jpeg4c747f33f37cd924a96f758f4e623ed0 3

AS OPPOSITION APC, WE PAID WOMEN FOR DEMONSTRATIONS AGAINST PRESIDENT JONATHAN’S GOVT – AMAECHI

Former Minister of Transportation, Rotimi Amaechi, has expressed concerns that President Bola Tinubu is not prepared to relinquish power in 2027.

Amaechi made this known in Abuja at a national conference on strengthening democracy in Nigeria, organised by the African Centre for Leadership, Strategy, and Development.

He criticised the attitude of Nigerian voters, accusing them of being easily swayed by politicians’ rhetoric and financial inducements.

He admitted that when the ruling All Progressives Congress (APC) was newly formed, the chieftains of the party paid women to demonstrate against the then ruling party – Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) and then President Goodluck Jonathan government.

According to Amaechi, many citizens do not ask critical questions about governance but rather focus on short-term benefits like transport fares provided by politicians.

“We have sweet mouths; we repeat the same things every day. Tomorrow, they will call you in Lagos, and you will go. Somebody told me in Lagos, ‘Mr. Amaechi, these people that gathered here, we called them, gave them transport money, and they came. If tomorrow Tinubu does the same, they will also come,’” he said.

Amaechi also recounted his experience during the early days of the ruling All Progressives Congress (APC), revealing how party supporters were mobilised for demonstrations through financial incentives.

“When APC was registered, I feared they might rig us out. So, we agreed to organise a demonstration at Eagle Square. We paid people to bring women and others. When I arrived early to assess the situation, I was shocked to see that the women we brought were wearing ‘Jonathan for President’ shirts.”

The former minister said, “All we have here is typical Nigerians, typical Nigerians, and you are clapping. That’s why politicians get away with everything—get away with murder—because you have short memory.”

He further warned that if citizens expect a change from the political elite, including the current administration, they would be disappointed.

Amaechi said, “Nobody has power that will give it to you, not even me.

He also claimed that Nigerian politicians, including Tinubu, are more interested in maintaining power through manipulation and violence than in fair governance.

He warned that those calling for change and expecting Tinubu to step down voluntarily are wasting their time, stressing, “None of you here seated can defend the votes, you have complained, complained, and Nigerians have clapped for you.”

  • Dons Eze

    DONS EZE, PhD, Political Philosopher and Journalist of over four decades standing, worked in several newspaper houses across the country, and rose to the positions of Editor and General Manager. A UNESCO Fellow in Journalism, Dr. Dons Eze, a prolific writer and author of many books, attended several courses on Journalism and Communication in both Nigeria and overseas, including a Postgraduate Course on Journalism at Warsaw, Poland; Strategic Communication and Practical Communication Approach at RIPA International, London, the United Kingdom, among others.

    Related Posts

    HOW OBIDIENTS PLAN OBI’S VICTORY IN 2027

    HOW OBEDIENTS PLAN OBI’S VICTORY IN 2027 Chief Chris Biose, popularly known as Obidient Daddy, is the Chairman of Delta Obedient Elders’ Council who was a Teaching Service Commissioner in the defunct Bendel State. In this interview, he spoke on the Tax Reforms Bill, INEC, Tinubu’s economic policies and the Obedient Movement’s preparation for the 2027general elections. Excerpts: Many Nigerians are presently of the view that INEC lacks the capacity to conduct free, fair and credible elections in the country. What do you think is the way forward to put our electoral system on the right track? Public perception of the consistently perfidious conduct of the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) is quite valid. The real challenge is an entrenched hegemony that pays lip service to democracy but is determined to perpetuate itself in power and prevent legitimate change of government by democratic process. The first line of action in putting the electoral system on the right track is for Nigerian youths and other stakeholders to make it unmistakably clear to the authorities that they would no longer tolerate political plunderers that steal elections to destroy their lives and drive them to forced migration to foreign lands. They must take back their country. A critical mass of Nigerians from all parts of the country need to engage in mental liberation in the struggle to build a Nigerian nation-state that is free from the shackles of neo-colonial and feudal bondage and archaic ideas and structures. Second, the Electoral Act must be amended to make electronic transmission of election results at polling unit, ward, state and national levels compulsory. In this regard, pro-democracy activists and civil society organisations (CSOs) must join hands with patriotic political formations in the country to renew the battle for electoral reform that resulted in passing the Electoral Act, 2022. Third, a critical mass of the electorate, particularly the youth population, could establish a trained Pro-Democracy Brigade in each village or community, to stoutly and uncompromisingly resist and expose vote buyers whenever or wherever they come along to purchase the future and destiny of Nigerian youths. The legal framework is absolutely necessary but it is never sufficient to ensure proper conduct or transparency of INEC officials. The fourth line of action therefore is for uncompromising democracy enforcers or Youth Brigades to ensure that INEC officials comply with voting regulations in all polling booths and collation centres across the country. I personally strongly believe that the presidential system is unsuitable to consolidate democracy in a multi-national and under-developed country like Nigeria. It is inordinately expensive and excludes many competent persons from participating in elections. It encourages executive dictatorship and abuse of power. The parliamentary system is less expensive, more participatory and more suitable for grassroot leadership recruitment. The Tax Reforms Bill presently before the National Assembly has been generating a lot of controversies. What is your take on this move by President Bola Tinubu’s administration? Taxation is the foundation of public revenue in the modern state. Public comments on the Tax Bill are fine and there is room for public hearing on the bill at the National Assembly. The quarrel in some quarters over the principle of derivation in payment of Value Added Tax to states is uncalled for. Derivation is the most rational and equitable method of revenue allocation. It was worked out in a series of Commissions, the last being Raisman Commission Report, 1959, which was enshrined in Section 140 of the Constitution of the Federation, 1960 and Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, 1963. It provided for 50% to the region of derivation, 30% to the distributable pool account and 20% to the Federal Government. The disagreement between the entrenched Fulani camp and the rising Yoruba faction of…

    SACKED PDP NATIONAL SECRETARY, ANYANWU, RISKS JAIL AS COURT ISSUES LAST WARNING

    SACKED PDP NATIONAL SECRETARY, ANYANWU RISKS JAIL AS COURT ISSUES LAST WARNING An Enugu High Court has restrained the sacked National Secretary of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP), Senator Samuel Anyanwu, from parading himself as the party’s scribe, failure of which he risks being committed to prison. The order, contained in a judgment delivered by the presiding judge, C.O. Ajah, stated: “Unless you (Anyanwu) obey the directions contained in this order, you will be guilty of contempt of court and liable to be committed to prison.” The judgment was sequel to a case filed by Emmanuel Aniagu (plaintiff), with the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP), the PDP Acting National Chairman, Iliya Umar Damagun, Anyanwu, and the PDP National Vice Chairman, Southeast, Ali Odefa, as defendants. The court ordered: “The 3rd defendant (Anyanwu) was elected National Secretary of the 1st defendant (PDP) in 2021 and has remained so to date. As National Secretary, he is, by the provisions of the 1st defendant’s constitution, as well as the Electoral Guidelines for Primary Elections made by the National Executive Committee of the 1st defendant, empowered by the provisions of Sections 31(20)(j) and 50(1) of the 1st defendant’s 2017 constitution to: – Draw up the list of members of the Gubernatorial Screening Committee for each of the six geopolitical zones of the 1st defendant when a decision on it is taken by the National Executive Committee. – Write and sign, or cause to be written and signed, letters appointing individual members to the Gubernatorial Screening Committee for the six geopolitical zones of the party. – Draw up the list of members of the Gubernatorial Screening Appeal Panel to handle appeals from gubernatorial aspirants of the party in all states of the federation, when the decision on the list is taken by the National Executive Committee. – Write and sign, or cause to be written and signed, letters appointing individuals as members of the Gubernatorial Screening Appeal Panel. – Draw up the list of members of the State Gubernatorial Electoral Committee for each of the 36 states of the federation when the National Executive Committee takes a decision on the said list. – Write and sign, or cause to be written and signed, letters appointing individuals as members of the State Gubernatorial Electoral Committee. – Write and sign, or cause to be written and signed, letters appointing individuals as members of the Gubernatorial Electoral Appeal Panel when the National Executive Committee takes a decision on the membership. “That the 3rd defendant has significant input in taking and implementing decisions on who will be adjudge eligible to contest the gubernatorial primaries and who shall be enthroned as the gubernatorial standard-bearer of the 1st defendant in all 36 states of the federation. “That the 3rd defendant was elected in April 2023 as the gubernatorial candidate of the 1st defendant for the Imo State governorship election, scheduled for November 2023, while still serving as the National Secretary of the 1st defendant. “That by occupying both positions, the 3rd defendant made himself a judge in his own cause. “That the 3rd defendant is hereby restrained from further parading himself as the National Secretary of the 1st defendant, having relinquished the said position by his conduct. “That the 2nd defendant is hereby ordered to recognize, in all situations and for all purposes, Hon. S.K.E. Udeh Okoye (the person recommended by the Southeast Zonal Executive Committee of the 1st defendant) as the National Secretary of the 1st defendant, to enable him to serve out the remaining tenure for which the 3rd defendant was elected as National Secretary in 2021.”

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

    You Missed

    PETER OBI CHALLENGES AKANDE FOR TRYING TO REWRITE HISTORY ON #ENDSARS

    PETER OBI CHALLENGES AKANDE FOR TRYING TO REWRITE HISTORY ON #ENDSARS

    POLICE, MILITARY EXTORTED N21.8BN FROM SOUTH-EAST ROADBLOCKS IN TWO MONTHS – INTERSOCIETY

    AS OPPOSITION APC WE PAID WOMEN FOR DEMONSTRATIONS AGAINST PRESIDENT JONATHAN’S GOVT – AMAECHI

    KADUNA MONARCH SLUMPS, DIES AT OCCASION

    COURT DISMISSES ENUGU PSYCHIATRIST HOSPITAL BOSS’ APPEAL AGAINST SENIOR NURSE