DEFECTION: WHY EXECUTIVE OFFICE HOLDER CANNOT LOSE SEAT

download 69

DEFECTION: WHY EXECUTIVE OFFICE-HOLDER CANNOT LOSE SEAT

While interpreting Section 221 of the 1999 Constitution relating to prohibition of political activities by certain associations, the apex Court rightly held in Amaechi v. INEC (2008) 5 NWLR (Part 1080) 227, 317-318 that:

“The above provision effectually removes the possibility of independent candidacy in our elections; and places emphasis and responsibility in elections on political parties. Without a political party a candidate cannot contest. The primary method of contest for elective offices is therefore between the parties. If, as provided in section 221 above, it is only a party that canvasses for votes. A good or bad candidate may enhance or diminish the prospect of his party in winning, but at the end of the day, it is the party that wins or loses an election. I think that the failure of the respondents’ counsel to appreciate the overriding importance of the political party rather than the candidate has made them lose sight of the fact that whereas candidates may change in an election but the party do not. In mundane or colloquial terms, we may say that a candidate has won an election in a particular constituency but in reality and in consonance with section 221 of the Constitution it is his party that has won the election.”

This judicial standpoint of the Supreme Court was followed in the later decision of Faleke v. INEC (2016) 18 NWLR (Part 1543) 61, thereby re-affirming that without a political party, a candidate cannot contest in an election; and where a candidate has won an election in a particular constituency, in consonance with Section 221 of the Constitution, it is his party that won the election.

However, a calm perusal of the foregoing decisions pointedly shows that the apex Court were not interpreting any of the provisions of Sections 131, 137, 177 and 182 of the 1999 Constitution or considering the issues of disqualification of an elected executive office holder for the purposes of his removal from office or whether an elected executive office holder can lose or vacate his office by leaving the party that sponsored him at the election. The inapplicability of judicial authorities to mutually distinct and unrelated instances have been noted by the Court and in Adegoke Motors Limited v. Adesanya & Anor (1989) 5 SC 113 at 166 the Supreme Court per Oputa, JSC held that:

“….It also appeared in rather bold relief that there is now a tendency among our lawyers, to consider pronouncements ….in unnecessary isolation from the facts and surrounding circumstances of those particular cases in which those pronouncements were made. I think it ought to be obvious by now, that it is the facts and circumstances of any given case that frame the issue for decision in that particular case. Pronouncements or our Justices whether they are ratio decidendi or obiter dicta must therefore be inextricably and intimately related to the facts of the given case. Citing those pronouncements without relating them to the facts that induced them will be citing them out of their proper context, for without known facts, it is impossible to know the law on those facts…”

Similar judicial attitude was expressed in the case of Oyeneyin v. Akinkugbe (2010) 4 NWLR (Part 1177) 265, 286 E-F, where the apex Court per Adekeye, JSC held that:

“Cases are not to be cited at large. The facts of the case must be similar, whereas generally speaking cases are decided on their peculiar circumstances or facts. Citing cases that are inapplicable to the peculiar findings in a particular matter lead to grave misconception and ultimately miscarriage of justice. Embarking upon the exercise of comparing and distinguishing an irrelevant case amounts to an unproductive academic exercise – which courts must shun in the furtherance of development of law.”

In any event, in the above mentioned cases of Amaechi and Faleke, the apex Court were not invited to determine the issue of whether an elected executive office holder, who leaves the political party that sponsored him at the election under which he assumed the executive office, will vacate his executive office upon leaving the said party or decampment. On account of this, the cases of Amaechi and Faleke are therefore not good authorities for such supposition.

Considered in a different prism, Sections 131, 137, 177 and 182 of the 1999 Constitution clearly set out the pre-election factors pursuant to which a person seeking to be elected into an executive position can be qualified or disqualified from contesting. In effect, Sections 131, 137, 177 and 182 of the 1999 Constitution are utterly inapplicable after the conduct of the election as they do not have or envisage post-election application.

  • Dons Eze

    DONS EZE, PhD, Political Philosopher and Journalist of over four decades standing, worked in several newspaper houses across the country, and rose to the positions of Editor and General Manager. A UNESCO Fellow in Journalism, Dr. Dons Eze, a prolific writer and author of many books, attended several courses on Journalism and Communication in both Nigeria and overseas, including a Postgraduate Course on Journalism at Warsaw, Poland; Strategic Communication and Practical Communication Approach at RIPA International, London, the United Kingdom, among others.

    Related Posts

    ATIKU’S CAMP ANNOUNCES OPPOSITION MERGER TO UNSEAT TINUBU IN 2027

    ATIKU’S CAMP ANNOUNCES OPPOSITION MERGER TO UNSEAT TINUBU in 2027 The camp of Atiku Abubakar, the 2023 presidential candidate of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP), has announced that a merger between opposition parties to defeat the All Progressives Congress (APC) in 2027 “is sealed.” Abdulrasheed Shehu, the special assistant on media to the former vice president, made the announcement via his verified Twitter handle on Friday night. Shehu stated that an alliance between the major opposition figures “is just about time.” This development comes on the heels of Peter Obi, the Labour Party (LP) presidential hopeful, criticizing President Bola Ahmed Tinubu over the state of the nation. Obi expressed concerns over purported institutional corruption, mismanagement, poverty, hardship, and an escalating debt profile. Although he admitted that there was no merger deal currently, the former Anambra State governor appealed to all lovers of Nigeria, irrespective of political affiliation, to unite and challenge the ruling APC. The proposed merger has also been shrouded in controversy. Prior to Obi’s media address, Rabiu Musa Kwankwaso, the presidential candidate of the New Nigeria Peoples Party (NNPP) in the 2023 election, refuted rumours of any agreement with Atiku and Obi. Kwankwaso stated that the camp of former vice president Atiku lied to some northern religious and political leaders about a purported agreement involving him and Obi to take turns at the presidency from 2027. Meanwhile, opposition supporters see a possible merger as a viable option to unseat the APC in 2027. In 2024, Ismael Ahmed, a prominent member of the All Progressives Congress (APC) in Kano State, addressed the potential impact of a coalition. Speaking on the Mic on Podcast, Ahmed, who previously served as a special assistant to former President Muhammadu Buhari on the National Social Development Programme, described an alliance between Obi and Atiku as a “potential threat.”

    PETER OBI: NIGERIA’S NUMBER ONE OPPOSITION LEADER

    PETER OBI: NIGERIA’S NUMBER ONE OPPOSITION LEADER – OMOKRI The presidential candidate of the Labour Party in the last election, Peter Obi, has been named as Nigeria’s number one opposition figure. This declaration is coming ahead of the 2027 general elections, where Obi is expected to contest again after coming third in the last polls in 2023. Reno Omokri, a former media aide to ex-president Goodluck Jonathan and a member of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) made the declaration in a statement on social media. Omokri, a popular commentator had previously worked for former Vice President Atiku Abubakar in previous presidential elections. However, in a sharp turnaround, Omokri has now thrown his weight behind Obi, stating that any other politician who thinks they are a bigger opposition figure is simply deluded. In a Facebook post on Friday, Omokri revealed that he admires Obi’s determination and resilience in the face of obstacles. “Peter Obi is currently the Number One opposition figure in Nigeria. Bar none. Anybody in any opposition party who thinks that he is bigger than Obi right now is just deluded,” Omokri stated. Omokri also took a swipe at some politicians in opposition parties, saying they have already been “retired” by Obi, but are being kept on “political life support” by their wealth. He, however, cautioned Obi to be less Igbo-centric, appeal to his supporters to use persuasive language, and apologize for his previous comment on religious war. “If only he could be less Igbo-centric, appeal to his Obidients to use persuasive rather than abusive words and admit, then apologise for his ‘Yes Daddy” religious war’ comment against the Muslim Ummah, he would go far,” Omokri added.

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

    You Missed

    TINUBU HAILS PETER MBAH FOR PLACING ENUGU ON PATH OF 21ST CENTURY DEVELOPMENT

    SELL WARRI, KADUNA REFINERIES – PETROL MARKETERS TELL FEDERAL GOVT

    OBASANJO TO TINUBU: HOW SUCCESSIVE GOVTS SPENT N232TRN IN BUDGETS

    FUEL PRICE MAY CRASH TO N500 PER LITRE – MATKETERS

    NOBODY MADE ME RIVERS GOVERNOR, I FOUGHT MY WAY TO POWER – WIKE

    BUA REFINERY NEARS COMMISSIONING