NJC SENDS TWO JUDGES PACKING OVER AGE FALSIFICATION

download 68

NJC SENDS TWO JUDGES PACKING OVER FALSIFICATION OF AGE

The National Judicial Council under the Chairmanship of the Chief Justice of Nigeria, (CJN) Justice Kudirat Kekere-Ekun, has sanctioned five serving judicial officers for various acts of misconduct.
Specifically, the Council at its 107th meeting held in Abuja suspended Justice G. C. Aguma of High Court of Rivers State from performing judicial functions for one year, and also placed him on watch-list for two years, thereafter.
Also, Justice A. O. Nwabunike of Anambra State High Court has been suspended from performing judicial functions for one year, and placed on watch-list for two years.
The Council also recommended two Heads of Court for compulsory retirement over falsification of age.
The duo – Chief Judge of Imo State, Justice T. E. Chukwuemeka Chikeka and the Grand Kadi of Yobe State, Kadi Babagana Mahdi – were recommended for compulsory retirement for falsification of their ages.
The Council equally considered the report of its Preliminary Complaints Assessment Committee, which considered a total number of 30 petitions and empanelled six committees for further investigation.
Twenty-two complaints were dismissed for lacking in merit, while two were sub judice.
The Council also empanelled a Committee to investigate all complaints and petitions against Justice O. A. Ojo, the Chief Judge, Osun State.
The Council’s findings revealed that Justice G. C. Aguma committed acts of misconduct by aiding a litigant who obtained a judgment at the FCT High Court, Abuja, and filed a garnishee against judgement debtors in Bori Division of the High Court, Rivers State.
The Council found that Justice Aguma failed to raise any query as to why the garnishee proceedings were brought to his court in Bori for a money judgment that could effectively be enforced in Abuja.
That the judgment was delivered on 15 July 2020, at the High Court of the FCT, while the certificate of judgment was registered at Bori Division of the High Court of Rivers State on 16 July 2020.
The Council further found that the speed with which Justice Aguma took and granted the order against the judgment debtors showed that he had an interest, especially as he failed to take into consideration the stay of execution of the judgment granted in favour of the judgement debtors by the Bwari High Court, which had been brought to his attention.
On the part of Justice A. O. Nwabunike of Anambra State, the Council found him to have breached the provision of Rule 3.1 of the Revised Code of Conduct for Judicial Officers of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, 2016.
He also failed to adhere to the principle of stare decisis from his different interpretation of the word “aspirant” and abused his judicial powers by granting ex parte orders without a Motion on Notice filed along with the Originating Summons.
Justice T. E. Chukwuemeka Chikeka was recommended to the Governor of Imo State for compulsory retirement with effect from 27 October 2021, while all salaries and allowance he received in excess from 27 October 2021 till date is to be refunded to the Council.
“The recommendation was pursuant to the findings of the Council that His Lordship has two different dates of birth; 27 October 1956 and 27 October 1958. However, 27 October 1956, appeared to be the consistent date of birth, but in 2006, the Chief Judge swore to an affidavit changing the date of birth to 27 October 1958.
“Similarly, Council finds that Hon. Kadi Mahdi has 3 different dates of birth (10 December, 28 January and July) all in 1959, while his actual date of birth was 1952.
“The Council held that Grand Kadi Mahdi committed an act of misconduct in violation of Rule 02908 (i) and (ii) of the Public Service Rules, 2021 and ought to have retired from service 12 years ago.
“The Council, therefore, resolved to recommend Hon. Kadi Babagana Mahdi for compulsory retirement to the Governor of Yobe State and that he should refund all salaries and allowances received for the past 12 years.”
The Council at its meeting, also issued letter of caution to Justice I. A. Jamil of Kogi State to be more circumspect in handling sensitive matters in the future.
The Council further resolved to issue letter of caution to Justice J. J. Majebi, Chief Judge, Kogi State, for assigning a sensitive matter to a junior judge on the Bench.
The Council also deliberated on 4 petitions against Justice Peter O. Lifu of the Federal High Court, Abuja as follows:
Petition by Mr Douglas W. Chukwu, the Secretary of the Rivers State Independent Electoral Commission against Justice Lifu was discountenanced, as the petitioner who had earlier indicated interest to participate in the hearing of his petition failed, neglected and refused to appear before the Committee.
The Council also finds that the allegations of inducement to the tune of $1 million, a bullet-proof car and gift of a plot of land to Justice Lifu by Chief Emeka Beke, Chairman, All Progressive Congress, (APC), Rivers State were not substantiated in any form.”
It was also found that the same parties who appeared before the High Court in Rivers State, also appeared before Justice Lifu at the Federal High Court in Abuja, but failed to disclose or bring to the notice of the judge, the existence of a sister case at Rivers State High Court.
The Council noted that the acts of misconduct alleged were actually perpetuated by the petitioners who filed the case at the Rivers State High Court, after the case at the Federal High Court, Abuja had been instituted, suggesting forum shopping.
The Council found that Justice Lifu neither exhibited personal interest in the matter nor misconducted himself in the procedure and noted that the complaints contained in the petition are now subject of appeal by the petitioners.
Similarly, the Council dismissed the two petitions by Abednego Oli Benjamin, Chairman, Boot Party, Rivers State Chapter against Justice Lifu, as it found the allegations of bribery and other corrupt practices against the subject judge were unsubstantiated.
It also found that there is no proof of misconduct in the ex parte orders made by the subject judge. Council also noted that the ex parte orders are now the subject of appeals.
On the petition by Dr. G. M. Giles-West Clark, Rivers State House of Assembly against Justice Joyce Abdulmalik of the Federal High Court, Abuja Division, the Council found that the petition was not supported with a verifying affidavit and was therefore, discountenanced.
On the petition against the Court of Appeal by Aham Eke-Ejelama, SAN, the Council found that the matters were cases that were commenced during vacation. It also found that they were urgent matters assigned to vacation Justices and that vacation judges sit in Abuja.
“Council also finds the assertion that the appellants’ counsel applied to be heard in Abuja, is not correct as only a Head of Court can assign vacation cases. Consequently, Council dismissed the petition for lack of substance.”
The Council thereafter directed the President of the Court of Appeal should deal with the assignment of the appeals administratively in the normal course of business.
Also, the petitions against Justice Peter C. Obiora, JCA, formerly of Anambra State High Court and Justice I. S. Yerima, Chief Judge, Oyo State, were discontinued by the petitioners through notices of discontinuance served on the Council.
The petition by C. Oforma Agbo, JP, against Justice Comfort C. Ani of the Enugu State High Court, was investigated and no evidence of judicial misconduct was found against the judge.
The petition against Justice Kabir Dabo, High Court of Justice, Kaduna State, by Alhaji Samaila Musa, was dismissed for being unmeritorious, as the judge did not violate any law by issuing a bench warrant for the arrest of the petitioner.
Furthermore, the petition by Hopeson Dike against Justice Stephen Dalyop Pam of the Federal High Court was discountenanced as the petitioner abandoned it and failed to honour Council’s invitation.
The Council resolved that Legal Practitioners who by themselves or in collusion with litigants write frivolous petitions to blackmail the judicial officers will be reported to the Legal Practitioners’ Disciplinary Committee (LPDC) or the Legal Practitioners’ Privileges Committee (LPPC) for appropriate action.
Also, at the meeting, the Council recommended 36 candidates for judicial appointment to various state governors.

  • Dons Eze

    DONS EZE, PhD, Political Philosopher and Journalist of over four decades standing, worked in several newspaper houses across the country, and rose to the positions of Editor and General Manager. A UNESCO Fellow in Journalism, Dr. Dons Eze, a prolific writer and author of many books, attended several courses on Journalism and Communication in both Nigeria and overseas, including a Postgraduate Course on Journalism at Warsaw, Poland; Strategic Communication and Practical Communication Approach at RIPA International, London, the United Kingdom, among others.

    Related Posts

    SPLIT IN APC DEEPENS

    SPLIT IN APC DEEPENS A visit on December 11 by Adeyeye Enitan Ogunwusi, the Ooni of Ife, to former Nigerian President, Muhammadu Buhari in his home town of Daura, has been followed, according to sources, by discreet visits by a number of other influential figures from the South West to the former President in a attempt to broker peace amid escalating rift between his camp and that of President Bola Tinubu, Business Hallmark gathered. According to close sources, Buhari, understood to have lost patience with President Tinubu over his policies perceived to be anti North, especially the controversial tax reform bills currently before the National Assembly, is said to have recently criticized government in the presence of close confidants, and consequently, urged his supporters to look in another direction in 2027. Business Hallmark also gathered that Aisha, Buhari’s wife, who was instrumental to convincing her husband to back Tinubu after he initially opposed his ambition in favour of Ahmad Lawan, former senate president, has also begun to regret backing the former Lagos governor, while allegedly resolving to work against him in 2027. The former First Lady, who struck a friendship with Remi Tinubu, the incumbent First Lady, in the lead up to the election last year, had reportedly lobbied to convince her husband to back Tinubu. And following Tinubu’s victory, he had allegedly refused to move back to Daura with her husband, expecting to get patronage from the new administration, which did not happen. “Mrs. Buhari had refused to return to Daura with her husband, preferring to stay at her palatial residence in Abuja, had expressed regrets that after her support for Tinubu, her brother, Halilu, who was promised the FCT Minister, did not get the plum job, neither has he been considered for any other position nor any of her other nominees considered for positions,” noted Jackson Ude, a U.S based journalist, who had reported the death of former Army Chief, Taoreed Lagbaja, long before the authorities confirmed his passing. “Close sources of the former First Lady told me Mrs. Buhari feel scammed that after all she was promised, she has, instead been humiliated as several overtures she recently made to see or speak with the President has been rebuffed.” Ude noted that prior to the 2023 presidential election, the Buhari Presidency was largely divided as to whom to support, with the former president not keen on backing Tinubu until few months to the elections when he was eventually convinced by his wife and some northern governors, who feared that attempting to keep power in the North could cause implosion in the APC. “After all she was promised, Mrs. Buhari is now in regrets that she has not been patronized enough to commensurate her actions that led to the Tinubu’s presidency,” Ude said. “She recently and quietly returned to Daura to be with her husband, seething in regrets, awaiting the completion of Buhari’s House in Kaduna while vowing to work against Bola Tinubu’s re-elections in 2027. “Mrs. Buhari’s position aligns with that of her husband, who has quietly and secretly criticized Tinubu’s government, urging his supporters to look another direction in 2027.” A source close to the former president confirmed to Business Hallmark that, “Things are really going south between Buhari and Tinubu.” He noted that while consultations had been ongoing for sometime, there’s been more urgency recently following Tinubu’s introduction of the four tax reform bills, some provisions of which have been opposed by many political figures in the North, including governors and senators. “The tax bills seem to the last stroke,” he said. “Tinubu has initiated some moves to broker peace, but that’s going to be the contentious topic.” Speaking further, he said, “Buhari is upset about the way Tinubu…

    EDO GOVT CHALLENGES TINUBU, SUPREME COURT ON SACKING OF LG CHAIRMEN

    EDO GOVERNMENT CHALLENGES TINUBU, SUPREME COURT ON SACKING OF LG CHAIRMEN The brewing constitutional crisis in Edo State took a dramatic turn on Monday, as Governor Monday Okpebholo and the Edo State House of Assembly doubled down on their suspension of all 18 local government chairmen, defying a High Court order reversing the suspension and prohibiting further interference in local council affairs. Justice Efe Ikponmwonba of the Edo High Court issued a mandatory injunction on Friday, declaring the suspension null and void and restraining the state government and other parties from meddling in local government operations until the substantive case is heard. However, state officials have flagrantly disregarded this ruling, signaling a direct challenge not only to the judiciary but also to President Bola Ahmed Tinubu’s hard-won victory on local government autonomy. President Tinubu, a champion of restructuring and grassroots governance, successfully secured a landmark Supreme Court judgment in July affirming the financial and administrative independence of local councils. This decision marked a pivotal moment in Nigeria’s federalism, curbing decades of overreach by state governors. Yet, the Edo State Government has chosen to openly defy the President’s signature policy, claiming that state laws supersede federal mandates. The crisis begun when Governor Okpebholo issued a 48-hour ultimatum demanding local council chairmen submit their financial statements directly to him—an overreach into financial autonomy clearly defined by the Supreme Court. Following their refusal, the governor petitioned the state assembly to suspend the chairmen, citing “gross misconduct” under Section 10(1) of the Edo State Local Government Law (2000). This section, however, had already been declared unconstitutional by the Edo High Court in a separate judgment last month. Despite these legal setbacks, the Edo Assembly promptly suspended the chairmen and their deputies for two months, disregarding both judicial authority and the Supreme Court’s ruling on local government independence. The state government’s defiance has extended beyond local disputes to openly contradicting statements from the Attorney General of the Federation, Chief Lateef Fagbemi SAN. The AGF recently reaffirmed that only local councillors—not governors or state assemblies—hold the constitutional authority to suspend or remove elected local government officials. Yet Edo officials, including Barrister Emwanta of the governor’s administrative panel, dismissed these legal realities. Appearing on national television, Emwanta declared that “the Constitution has placed local governments under state control, and that remains the law,” accusing the Supreme Court of overstepping its bounds. “Financial autonomy is about giving them access; but that does not mean state governments do not have control over how they use that money. The Supreme Court cannot amend the constitution,” he insisted dismissively. Adding fuel to the fire, Kassim Afegbua, another panel member, took aim at the AGF’s authority. “Lateef Fagbemi might be the law officer of the federation, but he does not represent the constitution of the country and he does not represent other laws made validly under the provisions of the constitution by the Edo House of Assembly,” he said. The governor’s spokesperson, Fred Itua, echoed this defiance in a scathing statement aimed at the Supreme Court. “The decisions by the Edo State House of Assembly, vis-a-vis, the Governor of the State, Senator Monday Okpebholo, are entirely justified…It is essential to note that the apex Court is both a court of law and a policy court, and while it has the power to make policy decisions, it cannot exercise this power when the Constitution is clear on a matter.” Itua doubled down further, stating, “The House of Assembly has the powers to oversight the activities of the Governor, and similarly, the Governor has the right to exercise oversight over local government chairmen. The current constitutional construct recognizes a two-tier federal design. It is clearly stipulated in the Constitution.” Analysts believe that this repeated dismissal of the…

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

    You Missed

    FRANCE OFFERING NIGERIA FUNDS TO DESTABILIZE NIGER REPUBLIC, NEIGHBOURING COUNTRIES – GENERAL TITANI ALLEGES

    • By Dons Eze
    • December 26, 2024
    • 50 views

    WEAK NAIRA, GOOD, MANY PEOPLE CAN’T TRAVEL AGAIN – TINUBU’S AIDE

    • By Dons Eze
    • December 26, 2024
    • 52 views

    POPE OPENS HOLY DOORS TO KICK OFF SPECIAL JUBILEE YEAR BY GOD

    • By Dons Eze
    • December 26, 2024
    • 32 views

    BOKO HARAM TERRORISTS BOMB NIGERIAN ARMY BASE IN BORNO ON CHRISTMAS EVE, INJURE MANY SOLDIERS

    • By Dons Eze
    • December 26, 2024
    • 63 views

    WIVES OF FORMER AFRICAN PRESIDENTS LAMENT DISRESPECT, NEGLECT AFTER HUSBANDS’ TENURE

    • By Dons Eze
    • December 26, 2024
    • 46 views

    REDUCE FOOD PRICES, STRENGTH AGRICULTURE , CAN TELLS TINUBU

    • By Dons Eze
    • December 26, 2024
    • 21 views