NORTHERN GOVERNORS MEET IN KADUNA, REJECT TINUBU”S TAX REFORM BILL

download 64 4 jpeg

NORTHERN GOVERNORS MEET IN KADUNA, REJECT TINUBU”S TAX REFORM BILL

The Northern States Governors’ Forum, led by its Chairman, Governor Inuwa Yahaya of Gombe State, and hosted by Governor Uba Sani of Kaduna, organized a strategic meeting to address the critical challenges of insecurity, poverty, and the high number of out-of-school children among other socio-economic concerns.

Ten Key Resolutions and Key Areas of Concern Raised At The Meeting were;

1 – Tax Reform Bill Rejection:

During the meeting, the northern state leaders and respected traditional heads expressed significant opposition to the recently proposed Tax Reform Bill presented to the National Assembly, explicitly denouncing the suggested transition to a Derivation-based Model for the distribution of Value Added Tax (VAT).

The governors contended that this model would place northern states and other regions at a disadvantage, as the current VAT distribution is based on the location of company headquarters rather than the actual consumption of goods and services.

This position was articulated in a communiqué delivered by Governor Muhammad Inuwa Yahaya of Gombe State, who serves as the Chairman of the NSGF, after a strategic meeting held in Kaduna.

Northern traditional leaders, Chief of Defence Staff General Christopher Gwabin Musa, and various other prominent stakeholders attended the meeting.

Governor Yahaya stated, “In view of the implications, the Forum unanimously rejects the proposed Tax Amendments and calls on members of the National Assembly to oppose any bill that may jeopardize the well-being of our people.”

2 – Sympathies and Solidarity:

The NSGF extended its sympathies to those impacted by the recent floods in Maiduguri and other northern areas while also offering assistance to families suffering from the effects of terrorism, banditry, and various other criminal activities.

The governors committed to ongoing cooperation with the federal government to deliver relief and facilitate the reconstruction of the affected communities.

3 – Enhanced Role for Traditional Institutions:

Recognizing the influence of traditional rulers, the Forum called for expanded roles for these institutions to strengthen cooperation with security agencies in tackling issues such as kidnapping, banditry, and communal clashes.

4 – Commitment to Security:

The Forum expressed appreciation to the federal government and security agencies for their recent achievements in combating criminal activities in the region, and acknowledged the commendable leadership of Chief of Defence Staff, General C.J. Musa. The governors emphasized the importance of maintaining and building upon these security advancements.

5 – Youth Empowerment:

In light of the recent youth-driven “End Bad Governance” protests, the Forum decided to enhance investments in education, skills training, and job opportunities, aiming to steer young Nigerians away from criminal behavior and social issues.

6 – Electricity Infrastructure and Energy Resilience:

Addressing the power blackout caused by vandalized transmission infrastructure, the NSGF urged federal intervention to restore electricity and build additional transmission lines to improve regional energy security.

7 – Agricultural Development and Industrialization:

With vast agricultural potential in the north, the governors pledged to support farmers with better financing, infrastructure, and modern techniques. They advocated re-industrializing the region by reviving the textile industry and other agro-allied sectors.

8 – Livestock Development:

The Forum expressed commitment to President Bola Ahmed Tinubu’s livestock reform initiatives, pledging collaboration with the Presidential Livestock Reforms Implementation Committee.

9 – Climate Change and Flood Mitigation: In response to recent flooding, the Forum emphasized the need to invest in irrigation infrastructure to manage excess water, protect rural livelihoods, and strengthen food security.

10 – Education Initiatives:

The NSGF affirmed its commitment to reducing the number of out-of-school children and improving education outcomes throughout northern Nigeria.

The NSGF reiterated its dedication to fostering national unity and development. In response, the governors emphasized the importance of equitable policy implementation across all regions to ensure that no geopolitical zone feels excluded.

In light of the economic difficulties confronting the nation, the Forum urged citizens to exercise patience as both state and federal initiatives aimed at alleviating economic struggles are put into action.

  • Dons Eze

    DONS EZE, PhD, Political Philosopher and Journalist of over four decades standing, worked in several newspaper houses across the country, and rose to the positions of Editor and General Manager. A UNESCO Fellow in Journalism, Dr. Dons Eze, a prolific writer and author of many books, attended several courses on Journalism and Communication in both Nigeria and overseas, including a Postgraduate Course on Journalism at Warsaw, Poland; Strategic Communication and Practical Communication Approach at RIPA International, London, the United Kingdom, among others.

    Related Posts

    NO MERGER DEAL WITH PDP, NNPP – PETER OBI

    NO MERGER DEAL WITH PDP, NNPP – PETER OBI The Labour Party (LP) 2023 presidential candidate, Peter Obi, has dismissed reaching a merger deal with the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP), the New Nigeria People’s Party (NNPP) or any other party. Peter Obi made this known on Thursday morning during a press conference in Abuja on the state of the nation, stating that no agreement has been established with other parties. The former Governor of Anambra State called on all lovers of Nigeria in the political space to unite in 2027 and defeat the All Progressives Congress (APC), which he accused of mismanaging the country’s resources. According to him, the level of corruption in Nigeria remained high, including the cost of governance, which has led to an astronomical increase in public debt under the current administration of President Bola Tinubu of the APC. Peter Obi maintained that government officials willfully mismanaged public funds in 2024 through incessant foreign travels. Speaking further, Peter Obi frowned at the insecurity situation in the country, stating that it is unfortunate that Nigerians are dying needlessly due to banditry, terrorism, and kidnapping-for-ransom. Meanwhile, the NNPP 2023 presidential candidate, Senator Rabiu Musa Kwankwaso, has dismissed the purported report of reaching an agreement with the opposition presidential candidate of PDP, Atiku Abubakar, and Peter Obi, to share power by alternating terms. Kwankwa , in an interview with the BBC, expressed anger over the lies. He stressed that he was unaware of such a claim but had heard reports that Atiku’s camp had been meeting with regional leaders, including clerics, to propagate the narrative. The former governor of Kano State also explained that he had found peace since leaving the PDP for the NNPP and distanced himself from the power-sharing agreement.

    DEFECTION: WHY EXECUTIVE OFFICE HOLDER CANNOT LOSE SEAT

    DEFECTION: WHY EXECUTIVE OFFICE-HOLDER CANNOT LOSE SEAT While interpreting Section 221 of the 1999 Constitution relating to prohibition of political activities by certain associations, the apex Court rightly held in Amaechi v. INEC (2008) 5 NWLR (Part 1080) 227, 317-318 that: “The above provision effectually removes the possibility of independent candidacy in our elections; and places emphasis and responsibility in elections on political parties. Without a political party a candidate cannot contest. The primary method of contest for elective offices is therefore between the parties. If, as provided in section 221 above, it is only a party that canvasses for votes. A good or bad candidate may enhance or diminish the prospect of his party in winning, but at the end of the day, it is the party that wins or loses an election. I think that the failure of the respondents’ counsel to appreciate the overriding importance of the political party rather than the candidate has made them lose sight of the fact that whereas candidates may change in an election but the party do not. In mundane or colloquial terms, we may say that a candidate has won an election in a particular constituency but in reality and in consonance with section 221 of the Constitution it is his party that has won the election.” This judicial standpoint of the Supreme Court was followed in the later decision of Faleke v. INEC (2016) 18 NWLR (Part 1543) 61, thereby re-affirming that without a political party, a candidate cannot contest in an election; and where a candidate has won an election in a particular constituency, in consonance with Section 221 of the Constitution, it is his party that won the election. However, a calm perusal of the foregoing decisions pointedly shows that the apex Court were not interpreting any of the provisions of Sections 131, 137, 177 and 182 of the 1999 Constitution or considering the issues of disqualification of an elected executive office holder for the purposes of his removal from office or whether an elected executive office holder can lose or vacate his office by leaving the party that sponsored him at the election. The inapplicability of judicial authorities to mutually distinct and unrelated instances have been noted by the Court and in Adegoke Motors Limited v. Adesanya & Anor (1989) 5 SC 113 at 166 the Supreme Court per Oputa, JSC held that: “….It also appeared in rather bold relief that there is now a tendency among our lawyers, to consider pronouncements ….in unnecessary isolation from the facts and surrounding circumstances of those particular cases in which those pronouncements were made. I think it ought to be obvious by now, that it is the facts and circumstances of any given case that frame the issue for decision in that particular case. Pronouncements or our Justices whether they are ratio decidendi or obiter dicta must therefore be inextricably and intimately related to the facts of the given case. Citing those pronouncements without relating them to the facts that induced them will be citing them out of their proper context, for without known facts, it is impossible to know the law on those facts…” Similar judicial attitude was expressed in the case of Oyeneyin v. Akinkugbe (2010) 4 NWLR (Part 1177) 265, 286 E-F, where the apex Court per Adekeye, JSC held that: “Cases are not to be cited at large. The facts of the case must be similar, whereas generally speaking cases are decided on their peculiar circumstances or facts. Citing cases that are inapplicable to the peculiar findings in a particular matter lead to grave misconception and ultimately miscarriage of justice. Embarking upon the exercise of comparing and distinguishing an irrelevant case amounts to an unproductive academic exercise –…

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

    You Missed

    YAR’ADUA REJECTED DANGOTE’S BID TO RUN NIGERIA’S REFINERIES – OBASANJO

    TINUBU’S GOVT LACKS IDEAS, DYNAMISM, TURNING INTO A MONARCHY – USMAN BUGAJE

    OBASANJO DOUBTS CAPACITY OF NNPC RUNNING GOVT-OWNED REFINERIES

    ENUGU HOUSE OF ASSEMBLY GETS NEW CLERK

    INFLATION: ORGANISED LABOUR PUSHES FOR MINIMUM WAGE INCREASE IN 2025

    NO MERGER DEAL WITH PDP, NNPP – PETER OBI