NIGERIA WAS NOT HUMILIATED AT UNHRC ELECTION – PRESIDENCY
The presidency has denied claims that Nigeria failed to win votes at the United Nations Human Rights Council election held at the UN General Assembly last Wednesday (9 October).
In a statement posted on X, the Special Adviser to the President (Information & Strategy), Bayo Onanuga, stated that the African regional group nominated five countries namely, Benin, Gambia, Kenya, DRC, and Ethiopia for the five seats allotted to the continent. He said this move eliminated the need for an election.
“There was no competition in the African regional group, as the continent fielded the same number of candidates as available seats. Contrary to information circulating, Nigeria was not snubbed in this election, as some reports have falsely claimed.
“The country did not stand as a candidate for this cycle of elections, just like it did not stand for election in 2023 when a Nigerian medium sensationally reported that the country earned three votes,” he stated.
Mr Onanuga said just like in 2023, Nigeria focused on offering support to countries who have been nominated by the African regional group. This he said, mirrors President Bola Tinubu’s leadership strategy in fostering unity on the African continent.
“The regional bloc endorsed Benin and Gambia, both members of ECOWAS, for the 2025-2027 term. Given Nigeria’s continued leadership in fostering African unity, the nation focused on supporting the endorsed candidates to promote collective African representation.
“This has been the hallmark of President Bola Tinubu’s leadership on the continent. This strategic approach aligns with Nigeria’s long-standing diplomatic efforts to ensure Africa speaks with a united voice on the global stage,” he added.
Explaining how Nigeria got the few votes, which triggered the speculation of Nigeria being snubbed in the election, he said, “Whatever vote was recorded for our country must have been cast in error in the secret balloting by some countries which thought Nigeria was on the ballot.”
The Human Rights Council election
The United Nations General Assembly elected 18 members to the Human Rights Council for a three-year term from 1 January 2025 to December 2027.
The Human Rights Council is a vital part of the United Nations system, comprising 47 member states that work together to promote and protect human rights globally. Its primary goal is to address human rights violations and make recommendations to improve human rights situations.
Those elected to the council using a secret ballot system are Benin, Bolivia, Colombia, Cyprus, Czechia, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Ethiopia, Gambia, Iceland, Kenya, Marshall Islands, Mexico, North Macedonia, Qatar, Republic of Korea, Spain, Switzerland and Thailand.
They will join Albania, Algeria, Bangladesh, Belgium, Brazil, Bulgaria, Burundi, Chile, China, Costa Rica, Côte d’Ivoire, Cuba, Dominican Republic, France, Georgia, Germany, Ghana, Indonesia, Japan, Kuwait, Kyrgyzstan, Malawi, Maldives, Morocco, Netherlands, Romania, South Africa, Sudan and Vietnam.
Reports suggesting that other countries think Nigeria does not deserve a seat on the Human Rights Council cast a shadow on President Tinubu’s administration.
Members of the UNHRC are expected to uphold human rights, and members who are deemed to violate these rights lose votes and are not elected into the council.
In extreme cases, the General Assembly may vote to suspend membership when gross violations are recorded.
Nigeria has been a regular UN Human Rights Council member since 1967. However, the country experienced two significant interruptions between 1982-1987 and 1991-1999. These periods coincided with a time of military rule, widespread human rights violations, electoral violence, and repression.
Although Nigeria has successfully maintained a democratic form of government for 25 years, the country’s human rights record has not improved significantly.
TINUBU’S GOVT LACKS IDEAS, DYNAMISM, TURNING INTO A MONARCHY – USMAN BUGAJE
TINUBU’S GOVT LACKS IDEAS, DYNAMISM TURNING INTO A MONARCHY – USMAN BUGAJE Islamic scholar, political activist, and civil society leader, Dr Usman Bugaje, has acknowledged THISDAY newspaper’s right to make the selection and declare President Bola Ahmed Tinubu as Man of the Year but expressed doubts about the criteria used, asserting that many Nigerians associate Tinubu’s presidency with suffering.“I used to know him as a man of ideas,” Bugaje said, recalling his time as National Secretary of the Action Congress (AC). “But I don’t see the ideas, I don’t see the dynamism, I don’t see the progressiveness. I see somebody who is almost turning into a monarch.”Speaking during an interview on ARISE News on Thursday, Dr Usman Bugaje raised concerns about governance, economic policies, and Nigeria’s political culture.Bugaje criticised Tinubu’s approach to governance, particularly focusing on the controversial tax reform bill, which he described as improperly introduced and lacking transparency.“The idea to smuggle things and come in through the back door creates a lot of suspicion,” Bugaje explained. He further stressed that governance in the 21st century should be more structured and scientific, focusing on purpose, process, and performance—elements he argued were missing in current policies.Highlighting broader concerns, Bugaje identified three key governance failures that he believed needed urgent attention: a lack of vision among political leaders, an absence of proper processes in policy making, and a political culture that contradicts principles of accountability, transparency, and the rule of law.“Leaders fail to understand Nigeria’s challenges,” he remarked, emphasising the need for policies grounded in reality.On the tax reform bill, Bugaje criticised the bill’s lack of clear definitions for contentious terms like “attribution” and “derivation,” warning that such ambiguities could lead to conflicts.“This bill has no relevance to the current economic crisis… We need a process that takes cognisance of the economy we’re in and the challenges we face,” Bugaje asserted.While he acknowledged the bill’s attempt to address inequalities, he argued that it did little to tackle Nigeria’s broader economic realities or promote sustainable growth.Bugaje also highlighted the security situation in the country, pointing to emerging threats like urban banditry, which he attributed to rising unemployment. He emphasised the need for a holistic approach to improving security in order to stabilise production and ensure economic recovery.“I feel this bill has no relevance to the current economic crisis that this country is going through and I would rather we start a whole process that takes cognisance of the kind of economy we are in, the challenges our economy is facing and therefore craft something that can gradually pick the economy up and will facilitate production in a way that will make this economy recover,” he stated.Bugaje dismissed the notion that the 1999 Constitution inherently fosters a monarchical style of governance. Instead, he blamed weak institutions, particularly the National Assembly, for failing to check executive excesses.“We don’t have a National Assembly; we have people just out there to make money, they have no idea of what their job is and they just go to these poor constituencies and spread rice and palm oil and nobody talks about that, if we continue that way, some day we will just wake up to a riot. Yes we need to address those weaknesses in our constitution but even as it is in the moment, we are not operating it properly,” he remarked, stressing the need for stronger oversight to ensure accountability and prevent abuse of power.Bugaje also called for the withdrawal of the tax reform bill in order to allow for broader consultations, describing the anticipated public hearings as a necessary but insufficient step.“Why do we have to fight over things that should ideally benefit the country? Why do we have to create a battlefield in the public hearing…