WILL TINUBU SURVIVE THE LOOMING ANARCHY, BY ERASMUS IKHIDE

download 2024 06 12T132829.741 3

WILL TINUBU SURVIVE THE LOOMING ANARCHY?, BY ERASMUS IKHIDE

Disillusioned Nigerian masses feeling the pang of economic crunch occasioned by President Bola Amhed Tinubu’s wrongheaded economic blueprints and fuel subsidy removal are already throwing spit into the air and collecting it with their face over the looming hunger protest slated for August 1st to 10th next week.

Here are the conundrum: will President Tinubu survive the protest from the benefit of hindsight, having been forewarned of the impending doom? Can he starve off the nation’s wrath for his bad vices through strategic politicking and empathy? We shall come back to that later.

Before Tinubu’s Presidency, Nigeria’s economic woes has remained a complex and multifaceted one, buoyed by yester-years of primitive economic policies which included but not limited to over-reliance on oil exports.

Nigeria’s economy is heavily dependent on oil exports, which makes it vulnerable to fluctuations in global oil prices.

Second is corruption. Widespread corruption has hindered economic growth, discouraged investment, and led to a lack of trust in institutions.

Third is poor infrastructure. Inadequate infrastructure, such as roads, power supply, and transportation, hinders economic activity and increases costs.

Fourth is Insecurity. Security challenges, including Boko Haram and banditry, have disrupted economic activity, discouraged investment, and led to humanitarian crises.

Fift is political instability. Political uncertainty and instability have created an unfavorable business environment.

Sixth is lack of economic diversification. Nigeria’s economy remains largely undiversified, making it vulnerable to external shocks.

Seventh is high inflation: Persistent high inflation has eroded purchasing power and reduced the standard of living.

Eight is unemployment. High unemployment rates, especially among youth, have contributed to social unrest and economic stagnation.

Nineth is dependence on imports. Nigeria’s reliance on imported goods has led to a significant trade deficit and depleted foreign exchange reserves.

Tenth is climate change. Climate-related shocks, such as droughts and floods, have impacted agricultural productivity and food security.

The eleventh reason Nigeria economy is going through turbulence is weak institutions. Ineffective institutions, including the judiciary and regulatory bodies, have hindered economic growth and development.

The twelveth reason is demographic challenges. Rapid population growth and urbanization have put pressure on the decaying infrastructure, services, and resources.

Back to the issue of stagnation and economy degradation which President Tinubu inherited and further sunk abysmally without redemption.

First, I do not want to believe that President Tinubu can’t address these interconnected challenges with a comprehensive and sustained effort by his policymakers, business leaders, and civil society to promote economic growth, reduce poverty, and improve living standards in Nigeria.

As Senator Ali Ndume puts it, his handlers are foggy his vision not see through the facades of falsehoods he is being field with.

Asides the fundamental foundation crises plaguing this nation, President Tinubu’s antideluvia strategists fanning the flames ethic violence – blaming everyone else other than themselves – are some of the thousand and one reasons the nationwide hunger protest most hold, albeit peacefully.

Whether his administration survives it or not is another matter, altogether. From all available indices, it is less likely that Tinubu’s government would survive the coming anarchy.

That Tinubu is unfeeling; asphyxiating, unemphatic and his outright boorishness, with his on-your-face impudent is a straightforward indication his government has crossed the rubicon.

Tinubu’s life time ambition is to govern Nigeria at all costs and by all means, and he got it. He should pursue the course of his governance to a logical conclusion. After all, Friedrich Nietzsche, the German philosopher’s eternal counsel urge all to “perish in the pursuit of your goal as there’s know no higher life-purpose than to perish in pursuit of something great and impossible”.Erasmus Ikhide contributed this piece via: ikhideluckyerasmus@gmail.com

  • Dons Eze

    DONS EZE, PhD, Political Philosopher and Journalist of over four decades standing, worked in several newspaper houses across the country, and rose to the positions of Editor and General Manager. A UNESCO Fellow in Journalism, Dr. Dons Eze, a prolific writer and author of many books, attended several courses on Journalism and Communication in both Nigeria and overseas, including a Postgraduate Course on Journalism at Warsaw, Poland; Strategic Communication and Practical Communication Approach at RIPA International, London, the United Kingdom, among others.

    Related Posts

    NIGERIA WAS NOT HUMILIATED AT UNHRC ELECTION – PRESIDENCY

    NIGERIA WAS NOT HUMILIATED AT UNHRC ELECTION – PRESIDENCYThe presidency has denied claims that Nigeria failed to win votes at the United Nations Human Rights Council election held at the UN General Assembly last Wednesday (9 October).In a statement posted on X, the Special Adviser to the President (Information & Strategy), Bayo Onanuga, stated that the African regional group nominated five countries namely, Benin, Gambia, Kenya, DRC, and Ethiopia for the five seats allotted to the continent. He said this move eliminated the need for an election.“There was no competition in the African regional group, as the continent fielded the same number of candidates as available seats. Contrary to information circulating, Nigeria was not snubbed in this election, as some reports have falsely claimed.“The country did not stand as a candidate for this cycle of elections, just like it did not stand for election in 2023 when a Nigerian medium sensationally reported that the country earned three votes,” he stated.Mr Onanuga said just like in 2023, Nigeria focused on offering support to countries who have been nominated by the African regional group. This he said, mirrors President Bola Tinubu’s leadership strategy in fostering unity on the African continent.“The regional bloc endorsed Benin and Gambia, both members of ECOWAS, for the 2025-2027 term. Given Nigeria’s continued leadership in fostering African unity, the nation focused on supporting the endorsed candidates to promote collective African representation.“This has been the hallmark of President Bola Tinubu’s leadership on the continent. This strategic approach aligns with Nigeria’s long-standing diplomatic efforts to ensure Africa speaks with a united voice on the global stage,” he added.Explaining how Nigeria got the few votes, which triggered the speculation of Nigeria being snubbed in the election, he said, “Whatever vote was recorded for our country must have been cast in error in the secret balloting by some countries which thought Nigeria was on the ballot.”The Human Rights Council electionThe United Nations General Assembly elected 18 members to the Human Rights Council for a three-year term from 1 January 2025 to December 2027.The Human Rights Council is a vital part of the United Nations system, comprising 47 member states that work together to promote and protect human rights globally. Its primary goal is to address human rights violations and make recommendations to improve human rights situations.Those elected to the council using a secret ballot system are Benin, Bolivia, Colombia, Cyprus, Czechia, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Ethiopia, Gambia, Iceland, Kenya, Marshall Islands, Mexico, North Macedonia, Qatar, Republic of Korea, Spain, Switzerland and Thailand.They will join Albania, Algeria, Bangladesh, Belgium, Brazil, Bulgaria, Burundi, Chile, China, Costa Rica, Côte d’Ivoire, Cuba, Dominican Republic, France, Georgia, Germany, Ghana, Indonesia, Japan, Kuwait, Kyrgyzstan, Malawi, Maldives, Morocco, Netherlands, Romania, South Africa, Sudan and Vietnam.Reports suggesting that other countries think Nigeria does not deserve a seat on the Human Rights Council cast a shadow on President Tinubu’s administration.Members of the UNHRC are expected to uphold human rights, and members who are deemed to violate these rights lose votes and are not elected into the council.In extreme cases, the General Assembly may vote to suspend membership when gross violations are recorded.Nigeria has been a regular UN Human Rights Council member since 1967. However, the country experienced two significant interruptions between 1982-1987 and 1991-1999. These periods coincided with a time of military rule, widespread human rights violations, electoral violence, and repression.Although Nigeria has successfully maintained a democratic form of government for 25 years, the country’s human rights record has not improved significantly.

    FOR AND AGAINST REGIONAL GOVT

    FOR AND AGAINST REGIONAL GOVTEven before a memo to that effect is presented to either the Senate or the House of Representatives ad hoc committees on the review of the 1999 Constitution, the proposal for Nigeria to return to regional government has gained ground, overshadowing other items before the committees.The 10th National Assembly is currently in the processes of reviewing the 1999 Constitution.The Senate committee alone has received 37 fresh constitution alteration bills, in addition to the 16 inherited from the 9th Senate, bringing the number to 53.During a recent retreat by members of the Senate ad hoc committee in Kano, the issue of regionalism came up and not only generated a heated debate but also elicited reactions across the country.Adebayo Knocks Tinubu over fuel hikeWhy we took initiative for Gowon’s 90th birthday –Jerry GanaIt was learnt that the matter came up when a document sent to the Presidency and copied to the leadership of both chambers of the National Assembly became public knowledge.The memo titled: “Path and Processes Towards Restructuring Nigeria,” written by Akin Fapohunda, a retired director in the federal service is advocating for a return to regionalism as a way of fostering development in the country.Fapohunda, when contacted by our correspondent, confirmed that he had sent a document with that title to the Presidency and copied same to the leadership of the National Assembly.The feelings that the proposal may return to the National Assembly as an executive bill piqued the interest of stakeholders in the former regions based on their understanding and perceptions about how their areas would fare under such an arrangement.Prior to the nation’s independence in 1960, the nation was divided into three regions: North, West and East, and in1963, an additional region, Midwest was created, making the number four in the First Republic.The regions were, however, collapsed in 1966 by the regime of General Aguiyi Ironsi with the promulgation of Decree No. 34.That the issue of returning the country to the old structure is resurfacing 58 years after indicates there are many who prefer the regional system.Proponents of regionalism point at how the defunct regions harnessed the natural resources in their respective domains to build robust economies that served them well and even enabled them to contribute to the centre in a pre-oil-dependent economy.The current structure, those in support of regionalism have argued, does not bring out the potentials of the governance units, which basically fold their arms waiting for federation allocations derived from oil sales.Secretary of the Arewa Consultative Forum (ACF), Alhaji Murtala Aliyu traced the agitation for regionalism to the colonial era when minority ethnic groups began to demand for recognition, resulting in the establishment of the Willink Commission to address their concerns.He said the Willink Commission highlighted this issue, and when the civil war started, 12 states were created based on the sentiments to address the demands of minorities.Fapohunda, whose memo generated the recent controversy, told Weekend Trust that he penned the document based on the significance of the demand on the need for sociopolitical fairness.He said: “On a political basis, Nigeria is not one. We have been deceiving ourselves. The only way to address such imbalances is for the country to return to regions.“If we say we have 600 tribes in Nigeria, let’s know these 600. Why are we sitting on them? Why are we saying only Wa Zo Bia? You cannot have justice when you sit on some other people. So, there is the need for us to regionalise so that there would be an expression of self-determination”, he said, adding that the current structure of Nigeria could not be sustained.Secretary of the Igbo Elders Consultative Forum and the Ohanaeze Council of Elders in the 19 Northern States and the FCT, Professor…

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

    You Missed

    SENATE PASSES VOTE OF CONFIDENCE ON AKPABIO

    WHY NIGERIAN GOVT REFUSED TO RELEASE NNAMDI KANU – IPOB

    LAWYER FAULTS AGBAKOBA ON LEGAL STATUS OF EFCC, SAYS POSITION BASED ON LEGAL SOPHISTRY

    RIVERS CRISIS: AS FAR AS LAW IS CONCERNED, STATUS OF THE BUDGET IS NULLITY – SAN

    NIGERIANS NOT FEELING TINUBU, SHETTIMA’S ABSENCE – AISHA YESUFU

    PRO-WIKE LAWMAKERS WRITE INEC, SEEK REPLACEMENT OF PRO-FUBARA LAWMAKERS