NIGERIA’S BALANCE OF TRADE COULD WORSEN UNDER TRUMP – ECONOMIST

th 84 9

NIGERIA’S BALANCE OF TRADE COULD WORSEN UNDER TRUMP – ECONOMIST

President Donald Trump on Monday became the 47th president of the United States, marking his second time as the country’s top leader. The President has also taken sweeping steps to reimagine the country’s relationship with immigration, its economy, global health, among others. Prof. Godwin Oyedokun, a don at Lead City University in Ibadan, spoke to DAILY POST in an exclusive interview on Monday, discussing how these will affect Nigeria’s economic and health sectors. Excerpts:
President Trump announced the US will start drilling oil again, and Nigeria majorly relies on oil for its foreign exchange earnings, any implication for Nigeria?
The US decision to ramp up oil production could significantly impact Nigeria, as oil constitutes over 80% of its foreign exchange earnings.
Increased US production would add to the global oil supply, likely depressing prices. This would reduce Nigeria’s oil revenue and worsen foreign exchange constraints, given its dependence on crude oil exports.
Also, US shale oil often competes directly with Nigeria’s light crude. A higher supply from the US could lead to reduced demand for Nigeria’s oil in the global market, potentially worsening Nigeria’s trade balance.
Does this extend to the implementation of the 2025 Nigeria’s budget?
Nigeria’s 2025 budget is likely based on projected oil revenue and price benchmarks. If oil prices fall due to US production increases, Nigeria could face revenue shortfalls and increased borrowing. This could affect the implementation of critical infrastructure, social welfare programs, and debt servicing commitments.
The government may also resort to further borrowing, exacerbating Nigeria’s already concerning debt profile.
There’s also an executive order by Trump ending birthright citizenship in the country, some argue it will benefit Nigeria against corrupt politicians, how true is this?
If Trump ends birthright citizenship, its direct impact on Nigeria would revolve around curbing the “birth tourism” trend among wealthy Nigerians, especially politicians who seek US Citizenship for Children. Ending automatic citizenship may discourage corrupt politicians and elites from using national wealth to facilitate expensive deliveries in the US.
In the long term, it could encourage investment in Nigeria’s healthcare sector as fewer Nigerians seek birth tourism.
However, it may also harm the diaspora community, as Nigerians already in the US might face increased immigration challenges. Furthermore, ordinary Nigerians seeking better opportunities might feel the brunt of stricter immigration rules.
Last year, the US spent about $1b in Nigeria through USAID. Now Trump has said the US will reevaluate and realign its foreign aid, what’s your take on this?
The US spending $1 billion in Nigeria last year highlights its commitment to supporting sectors like health, education, and security. However, a potential revaluation under Trump could mean reductions in aid. A scaled-down foreign aid budget could negatively impact critical programs such as health campaigns (e.g., polio eradication), educational initiatives, and anti-terrorism support.
While challenging, Nigeria may need to find alternative funding sources or develop more sustainable domestic solutions to address key developmental issues.
The realignment could also mean a shift in priorities, such as focusing aid more on security cooperation rather than health or education, depending on US strategic interests in the region.
How would you react to the US withdrawing from WHO and What are the possible implications on Nigeria’s health sector?
The US’s withdrawal from the World Health Organization (WHO) could have ripple effects on Nigeria’s health sector. Key concerns include funding gap, and weaker health infrastructure.
The US is one of the largest contributors to the WHO. Its withdrawal could reduce global health funding, potentially affecting programs in Nigeria supported by the WHO, such as malaria, tuberculosis, and HIV/AIDS eradication efforts.
Nigeria relies heavily on international aid and technical assistance to combat health challenges. Reduced funding from WHO could slow progress in tackling major diseases and health emergencies.
Opportunities for Nigeria:
In addition, Nigeria may need to increase budgetary allocation to healthcare to mitigate these impacts.
However, strengthening partnerships with other countries and organizations like the European Union and the African Union could also help fill the gap left by the US withdrawal.
Your final thoughts on what Nigeria should expect under Trump presidency
While the US policies under Trump may create significant challenges for Nigeria, they also present opportunities for introspection and reform. Nigeria will need to: diversify its economy away from oil to minimize exposure to global oil price volatility, strengthen domestic healthcare and educational infrastructure to reduce dependency on foregners.

  • Dons Eze

    DONS EZE, PhD, Political Philosopher and Journalist of over four decades standing, worked in several newspaper houses across the country, and rose to the positions of Editor and General Manager. A UNESCO Fellow in Journalism, Dr. Dons Eze, a prolific writer and author of many books, attended several courses on Journalism and Communication in both Nigeria and overseas, including a Postgraduate Course on Journalism at Warsaw, Poland; Strategic Communication and Practical Communication Approach at RIPA International, London, the United Kingdom, among others.

    Related Posts

    TRUMP REVOKES EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY ACT OF 1965

    TRUMP REVOKES EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY ACT OF 1965 President Trump issued a sweeping executive order Tuesday night revoking decades of diversity and affirmative action practices in federal government. Why it matters: This takes the current anti-DEI activism on diversity, equity and inclusion to a new level — abolishing decades of government standards on diversity and equal opportunity, and seeking to crack down on the same in the private sector. Trump’s order revokes one that President Johnson signed on September 24, 1965, more than two years after the Rev. Martin Luther King Jr. gave his “I Have A Dream” speech at the Lincoln Memorial. LBJ’s order gave the Secretary of Labor the authority to ensure equal opportunity for people of colour and women in federal contractors’ recruitment, hiring, training and other employment practices. It required federal contractors to refrain from employment discrimination and take affirmative action to ensure equal opportunity “based on race, color, religion, and national origin.” The order came more than a year after Johnson signed the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and just months after he signed the Voting Rights Act following violent attacks on voting rights advocates in Selma, Ala. The intrigue: The reversal comes after six GOP presidents — including Trump during his first term — kept the Johnson executive order in place, while others expanded it through amendments. Segregationists during Johnson’s time opposed the executive order. Conservatives since have voiced opposition to it, over claims it forced federal contractors to adopt a “quota system” for employees. It also comes just as Chuck Robbins, the CEO of Cisco and head of the influential Business Roundtable, defended the value of DEI at his company in an Axios interview in Davos. What they’re saying: Civil rights advocates were anticipating this move. Rev. William Barber of the Repairers of the Breach told Axios beforehand that Johnson’s executive order was needed to fight discrimination of that era and is still needed today. “It would significantly erode a civil rights enforcement tool that has been essential, in particular for women’s progress,” Jocelyn Frye, president of the advocacy group National Partnership for Women & Families, told Axios before Trump’s order was issued.“It sends a message and gives a green light to contractors that nobody is watching.” Trump’s order directs all “executive departments and agencies (agencies) to terminate all discriminatory and illegal preferences, mandates, policies, programs, activities, guidance, regulations, enforcement actions, consent orders, and requirements.” And it extends out to the private sector: “I further order all agencies to enforce our longstanding civil-rights laws and to combat illegal private-sector DEI preferences, mandates, policies, programs.” “The Federal Government is charged with enforcing our civil-rights laws. The purpose of this order is to ensure that it does so by ending illegal preferences and discrimination.” It goes a step further and orders federal agencies to compile lists of public companies, universities and large foundations for investigations and possible civil action over their DEI programs. Between the lines: Close Trump allies want to dramatically change the government’s interpretation of Civil Rights-era laws to focus on “anti-white racism” rather than discrimination against people of color, Axios’ Alex Thompson has reported. The bottom line: Corporations had already been rolling back diversity programs and policies in response from attacks from conservative groups — including White House aide Stephen Miller, who filed multiple lawsuits over corporate DEI at his group America First Legal. While some may push back, expect many to run even harder from those programs now.

    CAPITOL RIOT PROTESTER REJECTS TRUMP’S PARDON, SAYS IT’S INSULT TO RULE OF LAW

    CAPITOL RIOT PROTESTER REJECTS TRUMP’S PARDON, SAYS IT’S INSULT TO RULE OF LAW A Capitol riot protester has rejected US President Donald Trump’s pardon, criticising him for trampling on the law. Pam Hemphill partook in the January 6, 2021, riots that sought to overturn former President Joe Biden’s victory in the elections. The South Carolina resident was later sentenced to two months in prison and a three-year probation. She has since become a vocal Trump critic. After his inauguration on Monday, Trump issued a blanket pardon for all protesters who were serving time in prison, fulfilling a promise he made during his campaigns. “Every one of them gaslight you and try to have you feel sorry for them that the Capitol police attacked them, that they were the victims that day. They were not the victims. They were the perpetrators. It was an insurrection. They know exactly what they were doing,” Hemphill told CNN on Tuesday. “It’s just so difficult to wrap around my head right now that Trump could let these criminals out, some of them had criminal records before January 6.” In a separate video, Hemphill said she would refuse the presidential pardon. “I will not accept a pardon because that would be an insult to the Capitol police officers, to the rule of law and to the nation,” she said. The now-activist said she was not afraid of being a target for Republicans, adding that she was already the subject of smear campaigns. Following the attack, congress established a committee to investigate and report on the facts, circumstances, and causes of the insurrection. Nearly 1,600 suspects were charged, 1,270 convicted, and only two were acquitted. In the final hours of his presidency, Biden pardoned members of the investigative committee, fearing a reprisal from Trump. The former president said his actions were not an admission of guilt.

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

    You Missed

    GOVERNOR LOCKS OUT COMMISSIONERS, WORKERS FROM OFFICES

    • By Dons Eze
    • January 23, 2025
    • 106 views

    TRUMP REVOKES EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY ACT OF 1965

    TRUMP PARDONS TWO POLICE OFFICERS CONVICTED IN MURDER OF BLACK MAN IN WASHINGTON

    CLAIM OF ARMY RESCUE OF THREE KIDNAPPED PASTORS FALSE, N2M RANSOM PAID

    POLICE RESCUE KIDNAPPED RETIRED AIG’S WIFE, KILL KIDNAPPERS

    MILITARY KILLS BANDIT LEADER BELLO TURJI’S SECOND-IN-COMMAND, YOUNGER BROTHER FATALLY WOUNDED