FG DENIES ANY PLAN FOR FRENCH MILITARY BASE IN NIGERIA

download 81 1

FG DENIES ANY PLAN FOR FRENCH MILITARY BASE IN NIGERIA

The Nigerian government has refuted allegations made by General Abdourahamane Tiani, the head of state in Niger Republic, claiming that Nigeria is collaborating with France to establish a military base in its northern region to monitor Niger, Chad, and other neighbouring countries.
Speaking during an interview with BBC Hausa, the National Security Adviser to President Bola Tinubu, Nuhu Ribadu, dismissed the accusations as baseless and untrue.
“Nigeria has never had any agenda to permit foreign countries to come into our territory and set up military bases,” Ribadu stated.
Ribadu said the revelation made by Tiani came as a shock and surprise to them.
He clarified that Nigeria remains committed to fostering peaceful relations with Niger and would not support or engage in any actions that could destabilize the region.
In the five-minute interview, Ribadu reiterated Nigeria’s dedication to regional stability and cooperation.
He urged for a focus on constructive dialogue rather than unfounded accusations.
The claims by General Tiani come amid heightened security tensions, with accusations that France is planning to establish a terrorist operational centre in Gaba, a forested area in Sokoto State, Nigeria, following the recent coup in Niger.
Nigeria has played a central role in efforts by the Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS) to resolve the crisis peacefully.
Ribadu said, “Nigeria has no issues with instability or unrest with our neighbouring countries. We coexist peacefully with Cameroon, Chad, and Benin Republic. How, then, can someone claim we are having problems with the Niger Republic?
When asked about General Tiani’s allegation that France is financing the Nigerian government to establish a military base in the North for a potential invasion of Niger at will, Ribadu reiterated that such claims are unfounded and lack credibility.
Ribadu said, “Where did this come from? How could anyone claim that Nigeria would allow a foreign country to establish a military base here to cause havoc or instability for the people of Niger?
“Where would this happen? Nigeria has never had any agenda to permit foreign countries to come into our territory and set up military bases.”
“The British, who colonised Nigeria, have never attempted to bring their military into the country to establish a base,” he added.
“America has tried their best to establish a military base in Nigeria, but the Nigerian government declined their request. After our refusal, they went to Niger, and the Nigerien government accepted their proposal. However, the Nigerien government later realised their mistake and expelled them.”
He continued, “France, on the other hand, ensures that they establish military bases in almost all the countries they colonised. But Nigeria has never agreed to such arrangements with them to establish a military base in our country.
“We never agreed with them to launch anything, even for a day, let alone something that would disrupt peace or cause havoc in Niger. Where would this occur? However, we would never do such a thing.”
“But now, if Niger’s military is fighting with France, they cannot force us to join their fight. Nigeria is not at war with any country, and we have never fought any country in the world. Nigeria will never engage in warfare, and we will never allow any external forces to disrupt the peace and harmony of neighbouring countries,” Ribadu said.
Ribadu stated that the Niger junta leader mentioned some places in Nigeria, indicating a deep knowledge of the country.
He named specific locations, and we are calling on journalists and residents of those communities to investigate for Allah’s sake.
“Please verify if there are any foreign visitors in these areas, let alone connections to France,” he said.
“We want to assure the people of Niger that the Nigerian government will never allow any harm to come to them.
“We have been combating terrorists, bandits, kidnappers, IPOB, and militants in the Niger Delta and other parts of the country. By God’s grace, we have always emerged victorious.
“Nigeria’s neighbouring countries must understand that anything that happens in Nigeria will inevitably affect them as well. The Niger government needs to recognise that Nigeria is not their problem.”
Ribadu further explained that terrorists are the real issue. The problems caused by terrorists in Niger Republic are the same problems they are causing in Nigeria.
“We need to unite and fight these terrorists together. The people of Niger must understand that we are one big family, and any injury to one will inevitably affect the others,” Ribadu said.
He explained that it is unfounded for anyone to claim that the Nigerian government is aiding terrorists, especially when Nigeria itself is grappling with insecurity. He urged Niger’s leaders to reconsider their stance and conduct thorough investigations.
He also warned that if Niger replaces France with other foreign entities or missionaries, they may inadvertently create future problems for themselves.
“They should not allow countries opposing France to establish military bases in Niger. Any nation that comes as a friend today might become a problem for them tomorrow,” Ribadu stated.
He cited an earlier instance where the Nigerian government advised Niger against permitting the establishment of an American military base.
Ribadu said despite the warning, Niger allowed it, only to later regret the decision.
“We are now appealing to Niger to avoid relying on external forces. Nigeria is your family. Let us work together,” Ribadu urged.
He further called on Niger to rejoin the joint task force established with Nigeria, Chad, and other nations to combat Boko Haram and other terrorist groups.
He stressed that Niger’s withdrawal weakened collective efforts and could escalate security challenges.

  • Dons Eze

    DONS EZE, PhD, Political Philosopher and Journalist of over four decades standing, worked in several newspaper houses across the country, and rose to the positions of Editor and General Manager. A UNESCO Fellow in Journalism, Dr. Dons Eze, a prolific writer and author of many books, attended several courses on Journalism and Communication in both Nigeria and overseas, including a Postgraduate Course on Journalism at Warsaw, Poland; Strategic Communication and Practical Communication Approach at RIPA International, London, the United Kingdom, among others.

    Related Posts

    WEST AFRICA’S SEASON OF FAREWELL AND QUESTION MARK BY CHIDI AMUTA

    WEST AFRICA’S SEASON OF FAREWELLS AND QUESTION MARK, BY CHIDI AMUTA Frances’s major military base in Cote d’Ivoire is billed to close down at the end of this month. The long -standing base, Port Bouet, is to be rid of its French troop occupants and is to be renamed General Quattara Thomas d’Aquinn base after an indigenous military figure. No one knows whether the French were pushed or are voluntarily fleeing. The latter possibility makes more sense in the context of recent developments in relations between Paris and its many West African client states. Prior to now, the string of French speaking West African countries : Mali, Guinea, Burkina Faso, Niger and Chad- had severed military and even diplomatic links with France. It is the culmination of lingering colonial economic encumbrances and France’s own domestic political and economic contradictions. In the aftermath of these departures, a vortex of diplomatic and strategic waves have been unleashed. Jihadist military pressure from the northern parts of the Sahel have increased , leading to avoidable mounting casualties especially in Burkina Faso. Domestic political pressure has increased the demand for democratic rule as defined by new economic hardships occasioned by the bungling of the presiding military authorities. New national security arrangements masterminded by an increased presence of Russian troops in the region have crept in as well. New economic and diplomatic imperatives have been inaugurated as the military regimes struggle to adapt to new diplomatic and international realities. Initially, the impulse of non-French West African countries led by Nigeria was to impose sanctions on the countries that fell under military coups. The UN concurred as a reflex. Threats to air links and border closures however did little to discourage the new military juntas. The willingness of black markets and other rogue financial arrangements insulated the new military regimes from the more adverse effects of regional sanctions. One of the far reaching responses of the more daring military regimes has been to threaten the cohesion of ECOWAS, the regional economic integration bloc. An initial threat by ECOWAS to use military force to enforce compliance collapsed due to an obvious lack of military capacity and the cash poverty of most of the bloc’s member countries. In the intervening period, the military juntas have waxed stronger and become more a daring heart to the survival of ECOWAS itself. At the present moment, the three leading states-Mali, Niger and Burkina Faso have threatened to pull their countries out of ECOWAS. It is not just a threat but one backed by a deadline of end of January 2025. Nothing has happened so far that indicates a determination to save the 50-year old regional bloc. Many argue that there is little or nothing in the achievements of ECOWAS that deserves to be saved. West African economies have hardly grown, leaving little or nothing to integrate. The free movement of persons in and across the region has mostly translated into the freedom of impoverished “others” to travel into and out of Nigeria in search of opportunities that are hardly there. Otherwise, the free movement of persons has meant the free movement of jihadist insurgents and their black market arms or the migration of scraggy livestock across badly manned borders For Nigeria, the near total evacuation of French military, diplomatic and economic presence from West Africa poses huge foreign policy challenges. First, the imminent loss of ECOWAS is a major historical setback. Our clout as a regional leader is on its way home. The gains made in the days of ECOMOG and the restoration of peace and democracy in Liberia and Sierra Leone are about to be consigned to the dustbin of history. It must concern President Tinubu that this historic diplomatic setback will be happening…

    CATHOLIC PRIEST JAILED 11 YEARS FOR CRITICIZING GOVERNMENT

    CATHOLIC PRIEST JAILED 11 YEARS FOR CRITICIZING GOVERNMENT A Catholic priest in Belarus was convicted on Monday of high treason for criticising the government and sentenced to 11 years in prison. This marks the first instance of politically motivated charges against Catholic clergy since Belarus gained independence following the collapse of the Soviet Union in 1991. Rev Akalatovich’s conviction comes amid an escalating crackdown on dissent by Belarusian authorities in the lead-up to the presidential election on January 26, which is virtually guaranteed to secure a seventh term for authoritarian President Alexander Lukashenko. The Viasna Human Rights Centre reported that Akalatovich, aged 64, has denied the treason charges. The group has identified him as one of 1,265 political prisoners in the country. “For the first time since the fall of the Communist regime, a Catholic priest in Belarus has been convicted on criminal charges typically levelled against political prisoners,” said Viasna’s representative, Pavel Sapelka. “The severe sentence aims to intimidate and silence hundreds of other priests ahead of January’s presidential election.” Akalatovich, who has been in custody since November 2023, was diagnosed with cancer and underwent surgery shortly before his arrest. The priest, from Valozhyn in western Belarus, has been critical of the government in his sermons and has been held incommunicado, with prison officials rejecting warm clothing and food sent to him. He is among numerous clergy—Catholic, Orthodox, and Protestant—who have been jailed, silenced, or forced into exile for opposing the 2020 election that granted Lukashenko a sixth term. The widely disputed vote, denounced by the opposition and the West as fraudulent, sparked mass protests, which were met with a brutal crackdown resulting in over 65,000 arrests and thousands of instances of police violence. While approximately 80% of the population identifies as Orthodox Christians, just under 14% are Catholic, and 2% are Protestant. Lukashenko, who has held power in Belarus for nearly 30 years and describes himself as an “Orthodox atheist,” has berated dissenting clergy during the 2020 protests, urging them to focus on their duties rather than instigating unrest. Lukashenko counts as one of Russian President Vladimir Putin’s closest allies, permitting Russia to use Belarusian territory to deploy troops into Ukraine in February 2022 and to station some tactical nuclear weapons in Belarus. [

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

    You Missed

    GUNMEN IMPOSE N172.7M LEVY ON 25 ZAMFARA VILLAGES, FORCING RESIDENTS TO FLEE

    2024 FAILED PROPHECIES, NIGERIANS DOUBT 2025 PREDICTIONS

    ABA DISCO ANNOUNCES ELECTRICITY TARIFF HIKE

    NORTHERN PRESSURE GROUP SEEKS TRANSFORMATION TO POLITICAL PARTY, SAYS APC, PDP HAVE FAILED NIGERIANS

    WAEC INTRODUCES RESIT EXAMS FOR CANDIDATES

    INSIDE STORY OF KADUNA’S PEACE DEAL WITH BANDITS