CONCERN OVER PUTIN’S HEALTH, HAS NOT BEEN SEEN FOR TWO WEEKS

th 13 1

CONCERN OVER PUTIN’S HEALTH, HAS NOT BEEN SEEN FOR TWO WEEKS

President Vladimir Putin has not been seen in public for 13 days following claims of ill health, while the Kremlin is accused of releasing pre-recorded meetings.
The Russian president appears to have mysteriously disappeared – with his last public appearance being nearly two weeks ago at a conference in Sochi.
According to the Telegram channel VChK-OGPU, Putin has been undergoing health treatments: “Indeed, Putin has been absent from work recently and receives all reports exclusively via special communications.”
Those close to him are given the same standard answer in such cases: “He is undergoing a medical examination and a regular course of general health improvement.”
The channel added that nobody actually knows what the real answer is or where he is.
This is not the first time speculation have grown regarding the Russian president’s health.
Some claim he has appeared overly tired, having difficulty walking and strongly gripping tables in meetings – sparking rumours of Parkinson’s disease.
He was also said to have cancer several times in 2014, 2020 and 2022, and reportedly travels with an entourage of doctors to assist him in case of a medical emergency.
There are also reports of Putin using body doubles, who are said to have gone through intense plastic surgery to look identical to the president.
Speaking to The Sun, Russia expert Keir Giles said: “If you watch Putin closely, it’s hard to avoid the suspicion that often some of the appearances you’re seeing are not, in fact, the same person.”
He also noted the stark differences in the Russian president’s appearance – from looking healthy at one event to looking sick at the next.
“There are some times when he looks really quite frail, bloated, puffy, shaking, having to grip onto the table and only giving very short five-minute speeches even on major public events,” Giles said.
And then there are times when he appears to bounce back as a much healthier individual who is standing up and speaking for 40 minutes.”He added that the state of Putin’s health was a “mystery to us all.” The government has previously denied that Putin’s health is failing.
In October, Putin admitted in a televised meeting that he regularly undergoes medical examinations at the Central Clinical Hospital in Moscow.
After this comment, his aides quickly dispelled any rumours that the president was ill. His spokesman Dmitry Peskov said: “He meant routine medical examinations.”
The state news agency TASS also insists Putin “has no health problems.”
Regardless of the rumours, the Russian president seems to have no intention of slowing down, having won an election that permits him to continue ruling until 2030.
He has continued to lead Russia and its war on Ukraine.

  • Dons Eze

    DONS EZE, PhD, Political Philosopher and Journalist of over four decades standing, worked in several newspaper houses across the country, and rose to the positions of Editor and General Manager. A UNESCO Fellow in Journalism, Dr. Dons Eze, a prolific writer and author of many books, attended several courses on Journalism and Communication in both Nigeria and overseas, including a Postgraduate Course on Journalism at Warsaw, Poland; Strategic Communication and Practical Communication Approach at RIPA International, London, the United Kingdom, among others.

    Related Posts

    FOUR FACTS THAT MAKE SOUTH AFRICA THE TRUE GIANT OF AFRICA

    FOUR FACTS THAT MAKE SOUTH AFRICA THE TRUE GIANT OF AFRICA The title giant of Africa has for many years been attributed to Nigeria, the most populous and generally the richest African country in recent times. But the facts have changed between South Africa and Nigeria about who the true giant of Africa is. Nigeria in the last decade, has witnessed tremendous downturn in what has made it the giant of Africa, the country has been poorly managed by its political leaders, turning it into a shadow of its former self. A new force has always followed suit and, for many years, has been regarded as the underdog of development in Africa. South Africa is now ready to finally leave the underdog tag and is already taking Africa by storm. These four data-driven facts show it is now the true giant of Africa, surpassing Nigeria, and it may remain that way for many years to come unless Nigeria does something quickly and positively. Economy According to Statista 2024 ranking, South Africa has the largest Gross Domestic Product (GDP) in Africa, edging Nigeria in the first thing that matters. South Africa’s GDP amounted to just over 373 billion U.S. dollars in 2024, the highest in Africa. Egypt followed, with a GDP worth around 347.6 billion U.S. dollars and ranked as the second-highest on the continent. Algeria ranked third, with about 266.8 billion U.S. dollars. Nigeria comes a distant fourth in the ranking, with a GDP of 252.74 billion U.S. dollars. These African economies are among some of the fastest-growing economies worldwide, yet Nigeria is currently regressing in the scheme of things, the currency rate is a testament to this troubling issue. Education South Africa emerged as a front-runner in the latest Student Satisfaction report, outperforming both Nigeria and Egypt in several areas of education. Going by the information from the 2023 Global Student Satisfaction Awards (GSSA) report provides insights into the experiences of students from over 200 nationalities at 3,661 institutions, including South Africa, Nigeria, and Egypt. According to the report, South Africa achieved an impressive overall student satisfaction score of 3.98, a remarkable feat that outpaces the global average of 4.21. Furthermore, South African institutions also demonstrated excellence in enriching student life, scoring above the global average of 4.33. This achievement firmly places South Africa in the vanguard of education in Africa. Nigeria received a lower overall satisfaction score of 3.77, falling short of the global average due to voiced concerns about the frequent and extended lecturer strikes, alongside the quality of teaching and available facilities. Those in South Africa who responded cited crime as their main challenge. These concerns contributed to a low score of 3.45 for Nigeria in quality of student life against a global average of 4.33. During the assessment, one Nigerian student said, “There are never-ending strikes, outdated curricula, and a persistent lack of adequate teaching facilities. Although my university is ranked as one of the best institutions of higher learning in the country, the teaching methods employed by the lecturers still have a long way to go,” a true summary of what the education system has become, but not a true reflection of the brilliance of Nigeria students. Health If history is to go by, Nigeria should edge this very important aspect of existence. There was once a time when foreigners from around the world visited Nigeria for quality health care; fast forward to 2024, and all these have fallen apart. According to worlddata.info, a 2024 comparison between the two African countries showed South Africa has gone beyond the reach of Nigeria’s grasp in quality health care. Hospital beds per 1000 inh.: 0.50. 2.80 Physicians per 1000 Inh.: 0.40 0.81 Malaria cases: 292.217 ‰ 0.049 ‰ Rabies deaths:…

    140 YEARS AFTER THE BERLIN WEST AFRICA CONFERENCE BY CHIDI ANSELM ODINKALU & CHEPKORIR SAMBU

    140 YEARS AFTER THE BERLIN WEST AFRICA CONFERENCE BY CHIDI ANSELM ODINKALU & CHEPKORIR SAMBU Described by one scholar on its centenary as “perhaps the greatest historical movement of modern times”, the Berlin Conference West Africa Conference began shortly after noon on 15 November 1884. Interrupted only by a short break at the end of the year and the beginning of the next, historian, Adu Boahen,records that the conference ended on 31 January 1884. On 26 February 1885, the powers gathered at the conference ratified the General Act of the Berlin Conference, which embodied their agreements. The week before the ratification of the General Act, according to historian, Godfrey Uzoigwe, the Lagos Observer newspaper lamented that “the world had, perhaps, never witnessed a robbery on so large ascale.” ​Among the six goals identified by the General Act, the over-arching provisions set out “rules for future occupation of the coast of the African continent.” ​Of the 15 countries that attended the conference, 14 were European: United Kingdom, France, Germany, Austria-Hungary, Belgium, Denmark, Spain, Italy, the Netherlands, Portugal, Russia, Sweden-Norway, and the Ottoman Empire (Turkey). All the European powers signed on to the General Act. The United States of America was the only non-European country at the table and also the only participating country that did not officially ratify the resulting treaty. From Africa, the Sultan of Zanzibar had equally sought representation at the conference but had his ambition derisorily blocked by the United Kingdom. ​Otto von Bismark, Chancellor of Germany which attained unification only 13 years earlier in 1871, hosted the Berlin Conference. Six years earlier, he had similarly played host to the Congress of Berlin called to stabilize the Balkan Peninsula at the end of the Russo-Turkish War in 1878. There was an irony to the fact that the same venue was to serve as the site of a conference to Balkanise a distant continent of about 30,302,861 square kilometres. For context, this is territory big enough to contain all of the U.S.A., India, Europe, Argentina and New Zealandcombined with some room to spare. The Scramble for Africa preceded the Berlin Conference but the conference crystallised rules and doctrines that would govern the colonial occupation of Africa in its wake. In opening the conference, Bismark hoped that it would agree rules to regulate “the terms for the development of trade and civilization in certain regions of Africa”; assure free navigation of the Rivers Congo and the Niger; anticipate and avoid disputes as to new acts of territorial occupation in Africa and “further the moral and material wellbeing of the native population.” The aftermath is controversial for predictable reasons. The continent lives with the consequences of decisions in which it did not participate and whose records are also outside its control. While the lingering consequences of Berlin continue to be debated, a few deserve to be highlighted. ​First, as is evident from Bismark’s stipulations, the conference objectives and outcomes infantilized Africa and its peoples and habituated the world to the continent as lacking in agency and its territories as lacking in history or civilization prior to the occupation that followed in the wake of Berlin. These ideas were to be subsequently embodied in doctrine,jurisprudence and treaty law. The Judicial Committee of the Privy Council ruled in 1918 that African territories were “so low in the scale of social organization that their usages and conceptions of rights and duties are not to be reconciled with the institutions or the legal ideas of civilized society.” The court offered no authority or support for this decision; there was none. This jurisprudence made its way into the provisions of Article 22 of the League of Nations Covenant which referred to these territories as being “inhabited by peoples not…

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

    You Missed

    ENUGU SHINES AT UK BUSINESS FORUM

    • By Dons Eze
    • November 25, 2024
    • 23 views

    WHY NIGERIANS ARE GETTING POORER BY DELE SABOWALE

    • By Dons Eze
    • November 25, 2024
    • 22 views

    ENUGU RESIDENTS GROAN AS RESIDENTS RESORT TO TREKKING

    • By Dons Eze
    • November 25, 2024
    • 57 views

    NGO HOLDS TOWN HALL MEETING FOR SOUTH EAST JOURNALISTS

    • By Dons Eze
    • November 25, 2024
    • 18 views

    CONCERN OVER PUTIN’S HEALTH, HAS NOT BEEN SEEN FOR TWO WEEKS

    • By Dons Eze
    • November 25, 2024
    • 41 views

    HOW NIGERIAN LEADERS BECAME PRESIDENT BY ACCIDENT, NOT PREPARED FOR THE JOB – KUKAH

    • By Dons Eze
    • November 25, 2024
    • 25 views