FG APPROVES REVISION OF CONSOLIDATED SALARY STRUCTURE

download 2 32

FG APPROVES REVISION OF CONSOLIDATED SALARY STRUCTURE

The Federal Government has approved the revision of the Consolidated Public Service Salary Structure, CONPSS, with effect from July 24.

The Chairman, National Salaries, Incomes and Wages Commission, NSIWC, Ekpo Nta, said this during a press briefing on Tuesday in Abuja.

Mr Nta said that President Bola Tinubu assented to the Act after the Bill was forwarded to him by the National Assembly.

He said that any federal public service, whether self funded or treasury funded that had not received a circular to this effect, specifically from the NSIWC, should contact it for further directives.

Mr Nta said: “This is to avoid an un-coordinated implementation which has the tendency to destroy the existing salary relativities in the federal public service.”

He said that NSIWC would issue further directives on how pensioners, NYSC members and interns would benefit from the implementation.

The chairman listed other revised templates to include: Consolidated Research and Allied Institutions Salary Structure (CONRAISS), Consolidated Universities Academic Salary Structure (CONUASS) and Consolidated Tertiary Institutions Salary Structure II ( CONTISS II).

He said others were: The Consolidated Polytechnics and Colleges of Education Academic Staff Salary Structure (CONPCASS), Consolidated Tertiary Educational Institutions Salary Structure (CONTEDISS) and Consolidated Medical Salary Structure (CONMESS).

Mr Nta named others to include: Consolidated Health Salary Structure (CONHESS), Consolidated Para-Military Salary Structure, CONPASS, and Consolidated Police Salary Structure (CONPOSS).

The rest were: Consolidated Intelligence Community Salary Structure (CONICSS) and Consolidated Armed Forces Salary Structure (CONAFSS).

“This is consequent to the enactment of the NSIWC Amendment Act 2024 and the Memorandum of Understanding reached by the committee on consequential adjustments in salaries arising from the National Minimum Wage (Amendment) Act, 2024.

” Between the Federal Government of Nigeria and the Trade Union sides of the Joint National Public Service Negotiating Council Sept. 20,” Mr Nta said.

  • Dons Eze

    DONS EZE, PhD, Political Philosopher and Journalist of over four decades standing, worked in several newspaper houses across the country, and rose to the positions of Editor and General Manager. A UNESCO Fellow in Journalism, Dr. Dons Eze, a prolific writer and author of many books, attended several courses on Journalism and Communication in both Nigeria and overseas, including a Postgraduate Course on Journalism at Warsaw, Poland; Strategic Communication and Practical Communication Approach at RIPA International, London, the United Kingdom, among others.

    Related Posts

    CONTEMPT: NATASHA DRAGS AKPABIO, OTHERS TO COURT

    CONTEMPT: NATASHA DRAGS AKPABIO, OTHERS TO COURT The President of the Senate, Godswill Akpabio, and other top legislative officials risk imprisonment for allegedly defying a court order. Senator Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan has initiated contempt proceedings against them, with the Federal High Court in Abuja issuing Form 48 as a notice of their disobedience. The legal action stems from suit No. FHC/ABJ/CS/384/2025, filed by Senator Akpoti-Uduaghan against the Clerk of the National Assembly, the Senate, Senate President Akpabio, and the Chairman of the Senate Committee on Ethics, Privileges, and Code of Conduct, Senator Neda Imasuem. The notice, signed by the court registrar pursuant to Section 72 of the Sheriff and Civil Process Act 2004, emphasised the gravity of the situation. Court Warns Akpabio, Senate Officials: Obey or Face Prison The court explicitly warned the defendants that their actions constitute contempt, which could lead to imprisonment if they fail to comply. “Despite being duly served with the enrolled order on the 5th day of March 2025, you, the Defendants/Contemnors, have deliberately and contumaciously disregarded its binding directive,” the court stated. The legal notice further reiterated: “Take notice that pursuant to Section 72 of the Sheriffs and Civil Processes Act, your wilful disobedience of the order of this Honourable Court renders you liable for contempt of court, for which you may be committed to prison unless you comply.” The court had previously issued an order on 4th March 2025, restraining the Senate from proceeding with an investigation into Senator Akpoti-Uduaghan’s alleged misconduct during a February 20 plenary session. The order mandated that all defendants, including Senate leadership, cease actions against the senator until a final determination on the case. Despite the clear directive, the defendants reportedly proceeded with the probe, leading to the contempt proceedings. The court highlighted that any actions taken in violation of its order are “null, void, and of no effect whatsoever.” The court’s enrolled order also granted permission for the plaintiff to serve the Senate with case documents through alternative means, including pasting them at the National Assembly or publishing them in national newspapers. Additionally, the order sought to prevent the Senate’s Ethics Committee, chaired by Senator Imasuem, from advancing its inquiry into Akpoti-Uduaghan’s conduct. The court required the Senate to show cause as to why an interlocutory injunction should not be granted, reinforcing that the plaintiff’s privileges as a senator must be upheld in accordance with the Nigerian Constitution, Senate Standing Orders, and the Legislative Houses (Powers and Privileges) Act. With the issuance of Form 48, the Senate President and other officials now face legal consequences unless they comply with the court’s directives. Observers note that this case underscores the judiciary’s role in checking legislative overreach and upholding the rule of law. Legal analysts believe that the next steps in the case could significantly impact the Senate’s operations and Akpabio’s leadership. Should the court escalate the matter to Form 49, which calls for direct committal proceedings, Akpabio and his co-defendants may be forced to personally defend their actions or face severe sanctions, including possible imprisonment. As the controversy unfolds, political watchers are keen to see whether the Senate leadership will comply with the court order or continue its defiant stance, potentially leading to a major constitutional confrontation.

    NATASHA WAS SUSPENDED FOR GROSS MISCONDUCT, NOT SEXUAL HARASSMENT ALLEGATION – SENATE REPLY TO IPU

    NATASHA WAS SUSPENDED FOR GROSS MISCONDUCT, NOT SEXUAL HARASSMENT ALLEGATION – SENATE REPLIES IPU The complaint laid by Senator Natsha Akpoti-Uduaghan at the United Nations Inter parliamentary conference in New York on Tuesday has continued to attract reactions. The Kogi Lawmaker had taken her case before the global institution for them to prevail over what she says is an injustice meted on her. After listening to her complaint, the IPU told Senator Natasha that it will take necessary steps to address the complaints she brought to the union after listening to the other side. The Nigerian Senate has however replied to Senator Natasha’s complaint to the IPU through a letter by the Senate Leader, Senator Opeyemi Bamidele. The letter was read by the Chairperson of the House of Representatives committee on Women Affairs and Social Development, Honorable Kafilat Ogbara, who is attending the event in an official capacity representing Nigeria. The Senate letter read in part, “Senator Natasha-Akpoti-Uduaghan was suspended for gross misconduct and unruly behaviour and not as a result of allegation of sexual harassment or assault. The authority of the Senate of the Federal Republic of Nigeria firmly refutes the deliberate misinformation and false narrative being circulated by certain media organisations regarding the sixth months suspension of Senator Natsaha-Akpoti-Uduaghan. “Let it be unequivocally stated that Uduaghan was suspended solely for her persistent act of misconduct and disregard for the Senate Standing Orders.” Honourable Ogbara, however, called for a thorough investigation into the allegation by Senator Natasha against the Senator President, Godswill Akpabio. She maintained that procedures and necessary actions under the Senate rules were observed before Senator Natasha’s suspension. Last week, the Senate suspended the lawmaker in a move that has continued to generate debates across the country. She had initially submitted a petition to the Senate accusing Akpabio of sexual harassment. But the lawmakers threw it out before suspending her even after submitting another petition. Senator Natasha vowed to continue the fight against “injustice”. But in the wake of the suspension, Akpabio denied the accusations and maintained he has never assaulted women. Her altercation with the Senate president started on February 20, 2025, after her seat was changed during plenary. That is not the first time both individuals had issues. In July 2024, Akpabio had while trying to correct her for misconduct told her to follow the rules and that the Senate is not a nightclub where anybody can talk anyhow. The Akwa Ibom lawmaker, however, later apologised to her for the remark.

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

    You Missed

    CONTEMPT: NATASHA DRAGS AKPABIO, OTHERS TO COURT

    PDP CRISIS: WIKE’S CAMP KICK AS IKIMI PANEL RECOMMENDS ANYANWU’S EXPULSION

    GROUPS VOICE OUT ANGER OVER ALLEGED PLANS TO IMPEACH FUBARA

    WIKE CALLED BAUCHI GOVERNOR, BALA MOHAMMED, A BETRAYER FOR RENEGING ON PLANS AGAINST ATIKU ABUBAKAR

    LAGOS, AFRICA’S SECOND LARGEST CITY ECONOMY AS GDP HITS $259BN

    TINUBU OVERRULES AKANDE PANEL, BACKS OBASA TO REMAIN LAGOS SPEAKER