Premium News
An Abuja-based human rights lawyer, Barr. Christopher Chidera has clarified that the court in Finland did not mention the Indigenous People of Biafra, IPOB in its sentencing of agitator, Simon ekpa.
The lawyer explained l the judgement to some journalists in Abuja
He said the Päijät-Häme District Court in Finland convicted Ekpa for incitement, tax fraud, and professional misconduct, none of which, according to him, was linked to IPOB.
He raised serious concerns on what he called “malicious propaganda” being orchestrated against Nnamdi Kanu and what he called a legitimate campaign by IPOB.
The lawyer specifically noted “the malicious article published on iBrandTV and authored by Marshal Bassey under the false and misleading headline ‘Simon Ekpa’s Conviction: How the Igbo Biafra Dream Died a Natural Death’” on Monday, describing it as a “hatchet piece.”
He noted that the “fabrication collapsed under the weight of verifiable judicial records. It is propaganda designed to dampen the resilient spirit of Biafrans but instead exposes the intellectual emptiness of its author and his sponsors.”
He explained that the Finnish Court Judgment did not find IPOB wanting while it sentenced “Simon Ekpa personally to six years’ imprisonment on charges of participation in a terrorist organization, incitement, tax fraud, and professional misconduct.”
He pointed out that, “The Court never mentioned IPOB in its ruling. IPOB testified under oath that Ekpa was never a member and held no office in the movement.
“Ekpa himself admitted under oath that he was only a ‘content creator’ and had long disowned IPOB. If IPOB were guilty, Finland had the perfect opportunity to indict it. The Court declined to do so because no evidence exists against IPOB. This silence is itself exoneration,” he stated.
He frowned at what he called the article’s “reckless attempt to bury the Biafra dream through falsehood,” describing it as “pitiful.”
He said the author of the article “deliberately ignored the legal reality that IPOB is a lawful registered movement in Finland, operating transparently within the ambit of international law.
“His article is nothing but a paid smear job designed to launder Nigeria’s image while defaming IPOB.
He restated that, “IPOB is not, and has never been, a terrorist group. IPOB is a global self-determination movement anchored in law and justice.”
He warned that, “Any further attempts to defame IPOB will be met with lawsuits, international petitions, and reputational demolition.”
