Premium News
UPROAR OVER PLAN TO COMMIT ENUGU ASSEMBLY MEMBER TO PRISON, COMMUNITY ACCUSES COURT OF BIAS
An uproar ensued on Thursday at the Enugu South Magistrate Court as three lawyers fought fruitlessly to dissuade His Worship, E.D. Ownu to give a long adjournment date in a matter against an Enugu assembly lawmaker, Hon. Bright Ngene and a townsman over communal issue.
While the defence lawyers, Messrs C J S Okereke, Benjamin C. Nwobodo and Frabel Awgu asked the trial magistrate to adjourn the matter till next week to enable them study and reply to application filed by the prosecuting counsel, His Worship E D Ownu insisted that court must sit today, Friday.
Meanwhile the matter had been lingering since 2017 before Ngene ran for the assembly election.
When every effort by the defence counsel failed to sway the trial magistrate, they stormed out of the court, visibly angry.
Addressing journalists on the outcome of the proceeding, Barrister C.J.S Okereke said that the community had applied to discontinue the matter and wanted the matter transferred to another magistrate court in Enugu South Magisterial Court other than that of His Worship, Onwu, who they felt is biased and compromised.
“This court is biased. We have filed an application that the matter should be transferred to another court. Let another court see this matter because this court is compromised.”
Accusing His Worship, Onwu of comprising in the case, Okereke said they petitioned National Judicial Council, that they were not happy with Onwu handling the matter..
“When his disposition, Onwu, became unbearable, we saw counter and conflicting orders, we wrote the Chief Judge of Enugu State for direction as to which court we are going to hear this matter, there was no reply.
We wrote again and there was no reply and we were constrained to go to the highest disciplinary body of the bench, the NJC on June 7 and we got acknowledgment that the matter is being looked into.
“I don’t know why this court still want to hear the matter,” he lamented, saying that there was a gang plan to commit his client to prison so that he would not participate in the rerun election to maintain his position at the Enugu State House of Assembly where he had been representing Enugu South Urban Constituency before the Court of Appeals annuled the election and called for a rerun in 8 polling booths.
Irked by the development, people from Akwuke community carried placards condemning His Worship, E D Ownu for not allowing a longer time for adjournment.Some of the placards read: “His Worship E D Ownu is grossly lawless and rascal in presiding the case; E D Ownu how much were paid, among others.
